How to build vegetation patches in hydraulic studies: a hydrodynamic-ecological perspective on a biological object

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of ecohydraulics Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1080/24705357.2023.2176375
Loreta Cornacchia, Garance Lapetoule, S. Licci, Hugo Basquin, S. Puijalon
{"title":"How to build vegetation patches in hydraulic studies: a hydrodynamic-ecological perspective on a biological object","authors":"Loreta Cornacchia, Garance Lapetoule, S. Licci, Hugo Basquin, S. Puijalon","doi":"10.1080/24705357.2023.2176375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Vegetation in freshwater and coastal ecosystems modifies flows, retains sediment, protects banks and shorelines from erosion. Hydraulic laboratory studies with live vegetation or artificial plant mimics, or numerical models with abstracted patches, are often used to quantify the effects of vegetation on water flow and sedimentation. However, the choice of plant and patch characteristics is often not supported by field observations of patch dimensions, density or spacing between consecutive patches. The discrepancy between plants in natural conditions and in flume experiments or numerical studies may affect the relevance of these findings for natural ecosystems. In this study, we provide guidelines for building realistic vegetation patches in hydraulic studies. We collected data on four species of fully submerged freshwater aquatic macrophytes that can grow into well-defined patches. We considered three relevant levels: individual plants (inside patches), isolated patches and multiple neighbouring patches. At the plant level, we observed significant differences in biomechanical traits (Young’s modulus, flexural stiffness), resulting in stem Cauchy numbers ranging from 85.25 to 325.84, and leaf Cauchy numbers from 163.81 to 2003.97. At the patch level, we found significant relationships between patch length, width and height, showing covariation among different patch characteristics. The relationships among patch dimensions differed significantly among sampling sites for three of the four species, suggesting high intraspecific variability in patch sizes. By providing a first set of guidelines for choosing correct and ecologically relevant plant characteristics, this dataset aims to improve our understanding of the complex processes occurring inside and around submerged vegetated patches.","PeriodicalId":93201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ecohydraulics","volume":"34 1","pages":"105 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ecohydraulics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2023.2176375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Vegetation in freshwater and coastal ecosystems modifies flows, retains sediment, protects banks and shorelines from erosion. Hydraulic laboratory studies with live vegetation or artificial plant mimics, or numerical models with abstracted patches, are often used to quantify the effects of vegetation on water flow and sedimentation. However, the choice of plant and patch characteristics is often not supported by field observations of patch dimensions, density or spacing between consecutive patches. The discrepancy between plants in natural conditions and in flume experiments or numerical studies may affect the relevance of these findings for natural ecosystems. In this study, we provide guidelines for building realistic vegetation patches in hydraulic studies. We collected data on four species of fully submerged freshwater aquatic macrophytes that can grow into well-defined patches. We considered three relevant levels: individual plants (inside patches), isolated patches and multiple neighbouring patches. At the plant level, we observed significant differences in biomechanical traits (Young’s modulus, flexural stiffness), resulting in stem Cauchy numbers ranging from 85.25 to 325.84, and leaf Cauchy numbers from 163.81 to 2003.97. At the patch level, we found significant relationships between patch length, width and height, showing covariation among different patch characteristics. The relationships among patch dimensions differed significantly among sampling sites for three of the four species, suggesting high intraspecific variability in patch sizes. By providing a first set of guidelines for choosing correct and ecologically relevant plant characteristics, this dataset aims to improve our understanding of the complex processes occurring inside and around submerged vegetated patches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在水力学研究中建立植被斑块:一个生物对象的水动力生态学视角
淡水和沿海生态系统中的植被改变水流,保留沉积物,保护河岸和海岸线免受侵蚀。利用活植被或人工植物模拟物或抽象斑块的数值模型进行水力实验室研究,通常用于量化植被对水流和沉积的影响。然而,植物和斑块特征的选择往往没有斑块尺寸、密度或连续斑块之间的间距的实地观测支持。植物在自然条件下与水槽实验或数值研究之间的差异可能会影响这些发现对自然生态系统的相关性。在本研究中,我们提供了在水力研究中建立真实植被斑块的指导方针。我们收集了四种完全淹没的淡水水生植物的数据,它们可以生长成明确的斑块。我们考虑了三个相关的水平:单个植物(内部斑块),孤立斑块和多个邻近斑块。在植株水平上,我们观察到生物力学性状(杨氏模量、抗弯刚度)的显著差异,导致茎柯西数在85.25 ~ 325.84之间,叶柯西数在163.81 ~ 2003.97之间。在斑块水平上,斑块长度、宽度和高度之间存在显著的相关关系,不同斑块特征之间存在协变。4个物种中有3个物种的斑块大小在不同的采样点之间存在显著差异,表明斑块大小在种内具有较高的可变性。通过提供第一套选择正确和生态相关的植物特征的指南,该数据集旨在提高我们对淹没植被斑块内部和周围发生的复杂过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban stormwater management from the perspective of nature-based solutions: a bibliometric review Low-cost field particle image velocimetry for quantifying environmental turbulence Flood dynamics and its spatial prediction using open-channel hydraulics and hydrodynamic model in the dam-controlled river of India Forecasting green tide events in a semi-closed tidal flat using artificial intelligence and environmental big data Evaluating Apple iPhone LiDAR measurements of topography and roughness elements in coarse bedded streams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1