Gorboduc on Fire: The Pyropoetics of Tyranny in Early Modern England

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS Exemplaria Classica Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10412573.2022.2070369
H. Archer
{"title":"Gorboduc on Fire: The Pyropoetics of Tyranny in Early Modern England","authors":"H. Archer","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2022.2070369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article rereads Norton and Sackville’s Inns of Court tragedy Gorboduc (1562) in the light of its neglected preoccupation with fire. It posits the 1561 lightning strike on St Paul’s as a critical context for the play’s emphasis on fire as a motor of providential justice, through the repeated evocation of the myth of Phaethon, and locates its use of fire in performance at the intersection between political intervention and carnival festivity. Noting the play’s coevolution with the fire pamphlet genre, the article suggests that these ephemeral works’ commentary on the relationship between fire and tyranny, in line with sixteenth-century resistance theory and de casibus tragedy, illuminates how Gorboduc’s interests manifest in popular discourse, and allows an interpretation of the play’s imagining of rebellion which foregrounds the irony of its rhetoric of stability and obedience. In dialogue with recent work on the Pyrocene and European pyrophobia, and its implications in relation to Giorgio Agamben’s understanding of civil conflict and the state of exception, the article broadens the existing picture of Gorboduc’s resonance, to read it not just as pivotal in the development of English drama and political theology, but as contiguous with wider patterns of thought in premodern disaster response and narratives of collective action.","PeriodicalId":40762,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria Classica","volume":"79 1","pages":"168 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2022.2070369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article rereads Norton and Sackville’s Inns of Court tragedy Gorboduc (1562) in the light of its neglected preoccupation with fire. It posits the 1561 lightning strike on St Paul’s as a critical context for the play’s emphasis on fire as a motor of providential justice, through the repeated evocation of the myth of Phaethon, and locates its use of fire in performance at the intersection between political intervention and carnival festivity. Noting the play’s coevolution with the fire pamphlet genre, the article suggests that these ephemeral works’ commentary on the relationship between fire and tyranny, in line with sixteenth-century resistance theory and de casibus tragedy, illuminates how Gorboduc’s interests manifest in popular discourse, and allows an interpretation of the play’s imagining of rebellion which foregrounds the irony of its rhetoric of stability and obedience. In dialogue with recent work on the Pyrocene and European pyrophobia, and its implications in relation to Giorgio Agamben’s understanding of civil conflict and the state of exception, the article broadens the existing picture of Gorboduc’s resonance, to read it not just as pivotal in the development of English drama and political theology, but as contiguous with wider patterns of thought in premodern disaster response and narratives of collective action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
燃烧的戈布杜克:近代早期英国暴政的火焰诗学
本文从诺顿和萨克维尔1562年的《宫廷律师事务所》悲剧《戈博杜克》中被忽视的对火的关注出发,重读了这部作品。通过反复唤起法厄同神话,它将1561年圣保罗大教堂的雷击作为戏剧强调火作为天意正义的发动机的关键背景,并将其在表演中对火的使用定位在政治干预和嘉年华节日的交汇处。注意到戏剧与火小册子类型的共同演变,文章认为这些短暂的作品对火与暴政之间关系的评论,符合16世纪的抵抗理论和德卡西布斯悲剧,阐明了戈尔博杜克的利益如何在流行话语中体现出来,并允许对戏剧对反叛的想象进行解释,这种想象突出了其稳定和服从修辞的讽刺。通过与最近关于焦火神和欧洲焦火神的研究,以及它与乔治·阿甘本(Giorgio Agamben)对国内冲突和例外状态的理解有关的含义的对话,本文拓宽了戈尔博杜克共鸣的现有图景,不仅将其视为英国戏剧和政治神学发展的关键,而且将其视为与前现代灾难反应和集体行动叙事中更广泛的思想模式相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tra Iporchemi e Parteni (Pindaro, Hyporch. F9 Recchia) Il Paratesto in Catullo: alcune riflessioni su un saggio recente Pelasgus Sacca. Una nuova testimonianza su Sacada di Argo e alcune osservazioni sulla fortuna umanistica dei Deipnosofisti di Ateneo Cynthia e lo statuto dinamico dell’elegia, tra dream narrative, arte figurativa e modelli epici Olympica Pindarica (I)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1