Clinical Utility of Corona Virus Disease-19 Immunoglobulin G, M, Spike Protein, and Neutralizing Antibodies in Health, Disease and Post-Vaccination

E. Schaefer, F. Comite, L. Dulipsingh, M. Lang, Jessica Jimison, M. Grajower, N. Lebowitz, A. Geller, M. Diffenderfer, Lihong He, G. Breton, M. Dansinger, B. Saida, C. Yuan, R. Wilkes
{"title":"Clinical Utility of Corona Virus Disease-19 Immunoglobulin G, M, Spike Protein, and Neutralizing Antibodies in Health, Disease and Post-Vaccination","authors":"E. Schaefer, F. Comite, L. Dulipsingh, M. Lang, Jessica Jimison, M. Grajower, N. Lebowitz, A. Geller, M. Diffenderfer, Lihong He, G. Breton, M. Dansinger, B. Saida, C. Yuan, R. Wilkes","doi":"10.35248/2157-7560.21.S12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: About 80% of corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19) deaths due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection occur in subject’s ≥ 65 years of age, even though subjects in this age group only account for about 10% of COVID-19 cases. Our objectives were to assess age effects and the clinical utility of COVID-19 antibody levels in health, disease, and post-vaccination. Methods: We measured serum SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG and neutralizing antibodies using immunoassay kits obtained from Diazyme (Poway, CA) and spike (S) protein antibodies using immunoassay kits obtained from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN). Results: In 79,005 subjects, IgG and IgM levels were positive (≥1.0 arbitrary units [AU]/mL) in 5.29% and 3.25% of subjects, respectively, with median IgG levels being 3.93AU/mL, 10.18 AU/mL, and 10.85 AU/mL in positive subjects <45 years, 45-64 years, and ≥65 years of age, respectively (p<0.0001). IgG antibody testing was found to be valuable for case finding in 1,111 exposed subjects with a wide variability in response. Persistently positive IgM levels were associated with chronic symptoms. Median IgG levels were 0.05 in 100 controls, 14.83 in 129 COVID-19 outpatients, and 30.61AU/mL in 49 COVID-19 hospitalized patients (p<0.0001). Neutralizing antibody levels correlated with IgG levels (r=0.875; p 2 weeks after second vaccine for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca) in 105 subjects S protein antibody levels were all >250 U/mL and neutralizing antibodies were positive in all subjects except for 2 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 1 subject after the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. However, in all subjects, antibodies measured with the Diazyme IgG and IgM antibody and Roche total antibody levels were negative. S protein antibody levels were accurately assessed by fingerstick and micro-testing devices (Seventh Sense) in COVID-19 positive and negative subjects. Conclusions: Our data indicate that: 1) IgG levels are significantly higher in positive older subjects than in younger positive subjects, possibly in order to compensate for the decreased cellular immunity observed in the elderly, 2) IgG levels are important for case finding and there is a wide variability in response, 3) persistently elevated IgM levels are associated with chronic symptoms, 4) IgG levels are correlated with neutralizing antibody levels, both of which are significantly elevated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and 5) S protein antibody levels are >250 U/mL after full vaccination except for those with leukemia, and can be accurately assessed by fingerstick or micro-testing technology.","PeriodicalId":17656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","volume":"205 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7560.21.S12.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: About 80% of corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19) deaths due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection occur in subject’s ≥ 65 years of age, even though subjects in this age group only account for about 10% of COVID-19 cases. Our objectives were to assess age effects and the clinical utility of COVID-19 antibody levels in health, disease, and post-vaccination. Methods: We measured serum SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG and neutralizing antibodies using immunoassay kits obtained from Diazyme (Poway, CA) and spike (S) protein antibodies using immunoassay kits obtained from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN). Results: In 79,005 subjects, IgG and IgM levels were positive (≥1.0 arbitrary units [AU]/mL) in 5.29% and 3.25% of subjects, respectively, with median IgG levels being 3.93AU/mL, 10.18 AU/mL, and 10.85 AU/mL in positive subjects <45 years, 45-64 years, and ≥65 years of age, respectively (p<0.0001). IgG antibody testing was found to be valuable for case finding in 1,111 exposed subjects with a wide variability in response. Persistently positive IgM levels were associated with chronic symptoms. Median IgG levels were 0.05 in 100 controls, 14.83 in 129 COVID-19 outpatients, and 30.61AU/mL in 49 COVID-19 hospitalized patients (p<0.0001). Neutralizing antibody levels correlated with IgG levels (r=0.875; p 2 weeks after second vaccine for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca) in 105 subjects S protein antibody levels were all >250 U/mL and neutralizing antibodies were positive in all subjects except for 2 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 1 subject after the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. However, in all subjects, antibodies measured with the Diazyme IgG and IgM antibody and Roche total antibody levels were negative. S protein antibody levels were accurately assessed by fingerstick and micro-testing devices (Seventh Sense) in COVID-19 positive and negative subjects. Conclusions: Our data indicate that: 1) IgG levels are significantly higher in positive older subjects than in younger positive subjects, possibly in order to compensate for the decreased cellular immunity observed in the elderly, 2) IgG levels are important for case finding and there is a wide variability in response, 3) persistently elevated IgM levels are associated with chronic symptoms, 4) IgG levels are correlated with neutralizing antibody levels, both of which are significantly elevated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and 5) S protein antibody levels are >250 U/mL after full vaccination except for those with leukemia, and can be accurately assessed by fingerstick or micro-testing technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒病-19免疫球蛋白G、M、刺突蛋白和中和抗体在健康、疾病和疫苗接种后的临床应用
目的:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染导致的COVID-19 (COVID-19)死亡中,约80%发生在年龄≥65岁的受试者中,尽管该年龄段的受试者仅占COVID-19病例的10%左右。我们的目的是评估年龄的影响以及COVID-19抗体水平在健康、疾病和疫苗接种后的临床应用。方法:使用来自Diazyme公司(Poway, CA)的免疫测定试剂盒检测血清SARS-CoV-2免疫球蛋白M (IgM)、IgG和中和抗体,使用来自Roche Diagnostics公司(Indianapolis, IN)的免疫测定试剂盒检测spike (S)蛋白抗体。结果:79,005例受试者中IgG和IgM水平阳性(≥1.0任意单位[AU]/mL)的比例分别为5.29%和3.25%,阳性受试者中IgG水平中位数分别为3.93AU/mL、10.18 AU/mL和10.85 AU/mL,阳性受试者中位数分别为250 U/mL,除2例慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者和1例接种疫苗后均为中和抗体阳性。然而,在所有受试者中,用Diazyme IgG和IgM抗体和Roche总抗体水平测量的抗体均为阴性。采用手指棒法和微量检测仪(第七感)准确检测新冠肺炎阳性和阴性受试者的S蛋白抗体水平。结论:我们的数据表明:1)老年阳性受试者的IgG水平明显高于年轻阳性受试者,这可能是为了弥补老年人细胞免疫功能的下降,2)IgG水平对病例发现很重要,并且在反应上存在很大的差异,3)持续升高的IgM水平与慢性症状有关,4)IgG水平与中和抗体水平相关。5)除白血病患者外,全疫苗接种后S蛋白抗体水平为50 ~ 250 U/mL,可通过指戳或微量检测技术准确评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential Transcription Profiling in Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Between Myasthenia Gravis Patients With or Without Thymoma Rapid screening for variants of concern in routine SARS-CoV-2 PCR diagnostics Mast Cells and COVID-19: a case report implicating a role of mast cell activation in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 Evaluating Child Malnutrition in Southern Belize Using an Anthropologic Screening Tool Sero-prevalence and risk factors for sheeppox in Kordofan states in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1