Review Essay: Facing, Embracing, and Tracing Social Justice in Service-Learning

Kari Grain
{"title":"Review Essay: Facing, Embracing, and Tracing Social Justice in Service-Learning","authors":"Kari Grain","doi":"10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alan Tinkler, Barri Tinkler, Virginia Jagla, and Jean Strait, Editors Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2016 In the weeks following an intensification of gun violence in the United States (US), a popular Internet meme emerged in 2016--\"Things are not getting worse, they are just getting uncovered. We must hold each other tight and continue to pull back the veil\" (Brown, 2016). Penned by Black Lives Matter writer-activist, Adrienne Maree Brown, the quote quickly went viral. It offered a concise and accessible way for readers to reflect upon the history of social injustices, and implored them to summon the courage to learn despite fear of what might be found through that act of seeking. To \"hold each other tight\" is to value the role of closeness and relationships as a salve to the difficult knowledge that may be revealed. It is precisely this message that Service-Learning to Advance Social Justice in a Time of Radical Inequality presents. This volume, edited by Alan Tinkler, Barri Tinkler, Virginia Jagla, and Jean Strait, reckons with the indispensability of relationships and political orientations to the field of service-learning and community engagement. As with Brown's excerpt, this book reminds readers that injustice is not new, even when it is uncovered in great waves through first-hand or vicarious experience. If Brown's suggestion is true --that the most judicious response to injustice is a turning-loward one another rather than a turningaway--then this book offers a scholarly forum for such work without sacrificing a healthy exploration of resistance and critique. Service-Learning to Advance Social Justice in a Time of Radical Inequality continues the important work of stitching together the currently fragmented relationship between social justice as a concept [and sometimes as a concept that Bocci in Chapter 9 calls \"superficially social-justice-oriented\" (p. 272)] and social justice as a lived reality in diverse service-learning programs. Although I would like to have seen the notion of social justice explored in depth from the outset, this edited volume more than compensates for this through some authors' critical engagement with the theoretical roots and practical application of social justice in service-learning. The 15-chapter book is structured into four sections: (a) Service-learning to Reach Across Disciplinary Boundaries in Higher Education; (b) Service-learning to Support a Reimagining of Teacher Education; (c) Addressing Unconscious Bias and Racial Inequality through Social Justice and Critical Service-Learning; and (d) Service-Learning to Advance Community Inquiry. Each section contains a short introduction written by one of the four editors and briefly lays out concepts and considerations that connect the chapters. This review essay elaborates on two primary strengths of the book and raises one key suggestion for how we, as a community invested in social justice and community engagement, might approach similar volumes moving forward. First, I suggest that Service-Learning to Advance Social Justice in a Time of Radical Inequality offers readers a rich collection of critical theoretical approaches, rooted in an examination of systemic power and privilege. Here, the book faces important and uncomfortable root causes of inequities. Second, I describe ways in which the book exemplifies Brown's (2016) apt metaphor: to be an act of embrace and turning-toward. It is as much a relational embrace amongst authors as a collaborative conversation about the different theoretical and disciplinary approaches they use. Third, as a fellow scholar and practitioner who grapples with my own privileged identity visa-vis the deeply rooted structural issues that we attempt to address through critical service-learning, I suggest that social justice must not be a taken-for-granted term, as it appears to be at the outset of this volume. Instead, the ways that social justice is conceived must be traced through time and space. …","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0023.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alan Tinkler, Barri Tinkler, Virginia Jagla, and Jean Strait, Editors Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2016 In the weeks following an intensification of gun violence in the United States (US), a popular Internet meme emerged in 2016--"Things are not getting worse, they are just getting uncovered. We must hold each other tight and continue to pull back the veil" (Brown, 2016). Penned by Black Lives Matter writer-activist, Adrienne Maree Brown, the quote quickly went viral. It offered a concise and accessible way for readers to reflect upon the history of social injustices, and implored them to summon the courage to learn despite fear of what might be found through that act of seeking. To "hold each other tight" is to value the role of closeness and relationships as a salve to the difficult knowledge that may be revealed. It is precisely this message that Service-Learning to Advance Social Justice in a Time of Radical Inequality presents. This volume, edited by Alan Tinkler, Barri Tinkler, Virginia Jagla, and Jean Strait, reckons with the indispensability of relationships and political orientations to the field of service-learning and community engagement. As with Brown's excerpt, this book reminds readers that injustice is not new, even when it is uncovered in great waves through first-hand or vicarious experience. If Brown's suggestion is true --that the most judicious response to injustice is a turning-loward one another rather than a turningaway--then this book offers a scholarly forum for such work without sacrificing a healthy exploration of resistance and critique. Service-Learning to Advance Social Justice in a Time of Radical Inequality continues the important work of stitching together the currently fragmented relationship between social justice as a concept [and sometimes as a concept that Bocci in Chapter 9 calls "superficially social-justice-oriented" (p. 272)] and social justice as a lived reality in diverse service-learning programs. Although I would like to have seen the notion of social justice explored in depth from the outset, this edited volume more than compensates for this through some authors' critical engagement with the theoretical roots and practical application of social justice in service-learning. The 15-chapter book is structured into four sections: (a) Service-learning to Reach Across Disciplinary Boundaries in Higher Education; (b) Service-learning to Support a Reimagining of Teacher Education; (c) Addressing Unconscious Bias and Racial Inequality through Social Justice and Critical Service-Learning; and (d) Service-Learning to Advance Community Inquiry. Each section contains a short introduction written by one of the four editors and briefly lays out concepts and considerations that connect the chapters. This review essay elaborates on two primary strengths of the book and raises one key suggestion for how we, as a community invested in social justice and community engagement, might approach similar volumes moving forward. First, I suggest that Service-Learning to Advance Social Justice in a Time of Radical Inequality offers readers a rich collection of critical theoretical approaches, rooted in an examination of systemic power and privilege. Here, the book faces important and uncomfortable root causes of inequities. Second, I describe ways in which the book exemplifies Brown's (2016) apt metaphor: to be an act of embrace and turning-toward. It is as much a relational embrace amongst authors as a collaborative conversation about the different theoretical and disciplinary approaches they use. Third, as a fellow scholar and practitioner who grapples with my own privileged identity visa-vis the deeply rooted structural issues that we attempt to address through critical service-learning, I suggest that social justice must not be a taken-for-granted term, as it appears to be at the outset of this volume. Instead, the ways that social justice is conceived must be traced through time and space. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在服务学习中面对、拥抱与追踪社会正义
Alan Tinkler, Barri Tinkler, Virginia Jagla, and Jean Strait,编辑Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2016。在美国枪支暴力加剧的几周后,2016年出现了一个流行的网络表情包——“事情并没有变得更糟,它们只是被发现了。”我们必须紧紧抓住彼此,继续揭开面纱”(Brown, 2016)。这句话由作家兼活动家阿德里安娜·马里·布朗(Adrienne Maree Brown)写下,迅速走红。它为读者提供了一种简洁易懂的方式来反思社会不公正的历史,并恳请他们鼓起勇气去学习,尽管害怕通过寻求的行为可能会发现什么。“彼此紧紧抱在一起”是重视亲密和关系的作用,将其作为可能揭示的困难知识的一剂良药。在一个极端不平等的时代,《服务学习促进社会正义》所传达的正是这一信息。本书由Alan Tinkler, Barri Tinkler, Virginia Jagla和Jean Strait编辑,认为服务学习和社区参与领域的关系和政治取向是不可或缺的。就像布朗的摘录一样,这本书提醒读者,不公正并不新鲜,即使它是通过第一手或间接的经验在巨大的浪潮中被揭露出来的。如果布朗的建议是正确的——对不公正的最明智的反应是相互排斥而不是回避——那么这本书在不牺牲对抵抗和批评的健康探索的情况下,为这类工作提供了一个学术论坛。在一个极端不平等的时代,服务学习促进社会正义,继续将当前支离破碎的社会正义作为一个概念(有时作为一个概念,Bocci在第9章中称之为“表面的社会正义导向”(第272页))与社会正义作为各种服务学习计划中的生活现实之间的关系拼接在一起的重要工作。虽然我希望从一开始就能看到社会正义的概念得到深入的探讨,但通过一些作者对社会正义在服务学习中的理论根源和实际应用的批判性参与,这本编辑过的书不仅弥补了这一点。这本15章的书分为四个部分:(a)在高等教育中跨越学科界限的服务学习;(b)以服务学习支持教师教育的重新构想;(c)通过社会正义和批判性服务学习解决无意识的偏见和种族不平等问题;(d)服务学习促进社区调查。每一部分都包含由四位编辑之一撰写的简短介绍,并简要列出连接各章的概念和注意事项。这篇评论文章详细阐述了这本书的两个主要优势,并提出了一个关键建议,即我们作为一个投资于社会正义和社区参与的社区,如何向前推进类似的书籍。首先,我认为《在极度不平等的时代推进社会正义的服务学习》一书为读者提供了丰富的批判性理论方法,这些方法植根于对系统性权力和特权的审视。在这里,这本书面对了不平等的重要而令人不安的根源。其次,我描述了这本书在哪些方面体现了布朗(2016)的贴切比喻:成为一种拥抱和转向的行为。它既是作者之间的关系拥抱,也是他们使用的不同理论和学科方法的协作对话。第三,作为一名学者和实践者,我努力解决我自己的特权身份签证,而不是我们试图通过批判性的服务学习来解决的根深蒂固的结构问题,我建议社会正义不应该被视为理所当然的术语,就像它在本书的开头所表现的那样。相反,社会正义的构想方式必须通过时间和空间进行追溯。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1