Iranian EFL Teachers' Emotional Intelligence and their Use of Speaking Strategies

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research Pub Date : 2018-06-15 DOI:10.17583/REMIE.2018.3450
K. Shabani
{"title":"Iranian EFL Teachers' Emotional Intelligence and their Use of Speaking Strategies","authors":"K. Shabani","doi":"10.17583/REMIE.2018.3450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was designed to investigate the differences among Iranian EFL teachers in terms of emotional intelligence (EI) and their use of speaking strategies. To this end, 90 EFL male and female teachers teaching English at 9 institutes in Behshahr, Sari, and Amol cities in Mazandaran Province (north of Iran) were randomly selected. The research data were collected through the Bar-On EQ-I scale and teachers' use of speaking strategies questionnaire. Results on Independent Sample t-test reported significant differences in teachers' EI across gender. One-way ANOVA revealed differences in teachers' EI across years of teaching experience. Furthermore, results on Kruskal Wallis Test indicated differences in teachers' use of each speaking strategy regarding their level of EI.  Based on the findings, teachers with a higher level of EI preferred to focus on both accuracy and fluency and apply story-telling activities to create more successful interaction. While teachers with a lower level of EI preferred to focus on accuracy, they liked to apply information-gap activities. They preferred to offer implicit feedback through reformulation and tended to design groups and pairs to make silent students interact in the classroom. Moreover, both groups preferred to correct their learners later.","PeriodicalId":42901,"journal":{"name":"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/REMIE.2018.3450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study was designed to investigate the differences among Iranian EFL teachers in terms of emotional intelligence (EI) and their use of speaking strategies. To this end, 90 EFL male and female teachers teaching English at 9 institutes in Behshahr, Sari, and Amol cities in Mazandaran Province (north of Iran) were randomly selected. The research data were collected through the Bar-On EQ-I scale and teachers' use of speaking strategies questionnaire. Results on Independent Sample t-test reported significant differences in teachers' EI across gender. One-way ANOVA revealed differences in teachers' EI across years of teaching experience. Furthermore, results on Kruskal Wallis Test indicated differences in teachers' use of each speaking strategy regarding their level of EI.  Based on the findings, teachers with a higher level of EI preferred to focus on both accuracy and fluency and apply story-telling activities to create more successful interaction. While teachers with a lower level of EI preferred to focus on accuracy, they liked to apply information-gap activities. They preferred to offer implicit feedback through reformulation and tended to design groups and pairs to make silent students interact in the classroom. Moreover, both groups preferred to correct their learners later.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗英语教师的情绪智力与口语策略的运用
本研究旨在探讨伊朗英语教师在情绪智力(EI)和口语策略使用方面的差异。为此,在Mazandaran省(伊朗北部)的Behshahr, Sari和Amol市的9所学院随机抽取了90名英语男女教师。研究数据通过Bar-On EQ-I量表和教师口语策略使用问卷收集。独立样本t检验结果显示,教师的情商在性别上存在显著差异。单因素方差分析揭示了不同教学年限教师情商的差异。此外,Kruskal Wallis测试的结果表明,教师在使用不同的口语策略时,其情商水平存在差异。基于研究结果,高情商的教师更倾向于注重准确性和流利性,并通过讲故事活动来创造更成功的互动。而情商水平较低的教师更倾向于关注准确性,他们喜欢应用信息差距活动。他们更喜欢通过重新表述来提供隐含的反馈,并倾向于设计小组和结对,让沉默的学生在课堂上互动。此外,两组人都倾向于稍后纠正他们的学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
School Principal Leadership, Teachers’ Commitment and Morale in Remote Elementary Schools of Indonesia ABP y Competencias Investigativas en un Entorno Virtual: Resultados y Percepción del Estudiante Resources mobilisation challenges in rural schools of South Africa: What can we learn? Dialogic teaching beyond words Desigualdad social y territorial de la educación en España
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1