The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning with Model Eliciting Activities Approach towards Problem Solving Competency

Candra Kusuma Nurjanah, S. Supandi, A. S. Pramasdyahsari
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning with Model Eliciting Activities Approach towards Problem Solving Competency","authors":"Candra Kusuma Nurjanah, S. Supandi, A. S. Pramasdyahsari","doi":"10.26877/ijre.v3i1.13766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the average score and the effectiveness of problem based learning with the mathematics model eliciting activities approach to problem solving ability. The type of study is a quantitative research with a quasi experimental design using a pretest-posttest only control group design. The population in this study was class VIII SMPN 5 Jepara in the academic year 2022/2023 which consist of two classes. The sampling technique was carried out by purposive sampling technique, class VIII A was the control class and class VIII B was the experimental class. The data obtained through the pretest and posttest values were then processed by normality test, homogeneity test, T-Test, and N-Gain. The results obtained from the T-Test is a problem based learning model with an approach model of bringing up mathematical activities with a number of respondents 32 students and a mean of 81.22. While the control class taught by conventional learning has 31 students as respondents and the mean is 71.65. The value of t_count = 6.011 and a significance level of 5% obtained t_table = 1.999. Based on the t value, it can be written t_table (5% = 1.999) < t_count (6.011), then the results of the data analysis can be said that  is rejected and   is accepted so that \"there is a difference in the average problem-solving ability of students in class that uses the learning problem learning model raises students' mathematical activities. The next test is the N-Gain test. It is found that the experimental class mathematical problem solving is better than the control class, namely the increase in the experimental class has a medium category that is 0.47 and the increase in the control class has a low category that is 0.21 so that it can be said to be increasing and effective.","PeriodicalId":90868,"journal":{"name":"International journal of quantitative research in education","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of quantitative research in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v3i1.13766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the average score and the effectiveness of problem based learning with the mathematics model eliciting activities approach to problem solving ability. The type of study is a quantitative research with a quasi experimental design using a pretest-posttest only control group design. The population in this study was class VIII SMPN 5 Jepara in the academic year 2022/2023 which consist of two classes. The sampling technique was carried out by purposive sampling technique, class VIII A was the control class and class VIII B was the experimental class. The data obtained through the pretest and posttest values were then processed by normality test, homogeneity test, T-Test, and N-Gain. The results obtained from the T-Test is a problem based learning model with an approach model of bringing up mathematical activities with a number of respondents 32 students and a mean of 81.22. While the control class taught by conventional learning has 31 students as respondents and the mean is 71.65. The value of t_count = 6.011 and a significance level of 5% obtained t_table = 1.999. Based on the t value, it can be written t_table (5% = 1.999) < t_count (6.011), then the results of the data analysis can be said that  is rejected and   is accepted so that "there is a difference in the average problem-solving ability of students in class that uses the learning problem learning model raises students' mathematical activities. The next test is the N-Gain test. It is found that the experimental class mathematical problem solving is better than the control class, namely the increase in the experimental class has a medium category that is 0.47 and the increase in the control class has a low category that is 0.21 so that it can be said to be increasing and effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于问题的问题学习与模型引出活动方法对问题解决能力的有效性
本研究的目的是确定问题学习的平均分和问题学习的有效性是否与数学模型引出活动方法对问题解决能力的影响。研究类型为定量研究,采用准实验设计,仅采用前测后测对照组设计。本研究的人群为2022/2023学年SMPN 5 Jepara VIII班,由两个班组成。取样技术采用目的取样技术,8a班为对照班,8b班为实验班。对前测值和后测值得到的数据进行正态性检验、齐性检验、t检验和N-Gain处理。t检验的结果是一个基于问题的学习模型,采用提出数学活动的方法模型,调查对象为32名学生,平均为81.22。而传统学习方式的对照组有31名学生作为调查对象,平均为71.65人。t_count = 6.011,显著性水平为5%,得到t_table = 1.999。根据t值,可以写出t_table (5% = 1.999) < t_count(6.011),那么数据分析的结果可以说是否定的,可以接受的,因此“使用学习问题学习模式培养学生数学活动的班级学生平均解决问题的能力存在差异”。下一个测试是n -增益测试。发现实验班的数学解题效果优于控制班,即实验班的增加有一个中等类别,为0.47,而控制班的增加有一个低类别,为0.21,可以说是增加的,有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of The Independent Teaching Platform (PMM) in Increasing The Competency of Primary and Secondary Education Teachers The Art of Questioning in Online Learning: Effective Questioning Strategies in EFL Reading Class Pragmatics Perspective of Genre-based Approach Essay Writing Textbook to Improve Students’ Writing Skills at English Education Department of Universitas PGRI Semarang The Influence of Lunges and Rubber Load Exercises on Ap Chagi Kick Speed in UNTAD Taekwondo Club (UTC) Athletes The Effects of Using Flashcard Learning Media to Improve Reading Comprehension in Children with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1