A Threshold for Citizen Science Projects: Complex Thinking as a Driver of Holistic Development

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.5944/ried.25.2.33052
Jorge Sanabria-Z, J.M. Molina Espinosa, Berenice Alfaro Ponce, Martina Vycudilíková Outlá
{"title":"A Threshold for Citizen Science Projects: Complex Thinking as a Driver of Holistic Development","authors":"Jorge Sanabria-Z, J.M. Molina Espinosa, Berenice Alfaro Ponce, Martina Vycudilíková Outlá","doi":"10.5944/ried.25.2.33052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging technologies and community empowerment have driven citizen science (CS) projects. However, their impact remains vague, partly because of the difficulties in monitoring and standardizing these projects. Notably, the development of citizens' complex thinking is not among the primary goals, despite the connection with the tenets of Education 4.0 and the training of socially committed citizens. Therefore, we propose a framework and typology to foster CS projects while scaling up complex thinking. We used the evidence-based educational innovation (EBEI) methodology and the Theory of Change (ToC) perspective, reviewing some of the most relevant frameworks under UNESCO's Open Science Recommendation. Findings from the CS projects analysis revealed that: (a) there is inattention to developing the sub-components of the complex thinking macro-competency; (b) a growing trend to develop frameworks for CS projects is taking place; (c) there is a prevalence of CS project frameworks focused on prevention and control, project evaluation and design, and education and research; (d) a framework with three dimensions based on ToC (Outbound, Threshold and Full-cycle) can guide the development of CS projects; and (e) an eight-component typology can measure the progress and impact of CS projects from the perspectives of Context-awareness, Citizen engagement, Infrastructure leverage, Technological innovation, Educational innovation, Outreach and Scale, Network building, and Complex Thinking. We envision that the integrated framework and typology proposed, scaffolded by complex thinking, can comprehensively broaden the impact of CS initiatives.","PeriodicalId":45698,"journal":{"name":"Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.33052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Emerging technologies and community empowerment have driven citizen science (CS) projects. However, their impact remains vague, partly because of the difficulties in monitoring and standardizing these projects. Notably, the development of citizens' complex thinking is not among the primary goals, despite the connection with the tenets of Education 4.0 and the training of socially committed citizens. Therefore, we propose a framework and typology to foster CS projects while scaling up complex thinking. We used the evidence-based educational innovation (EBEI) methodology and the Theory of Change (ToC) perspective, reviewing some of the most relevant frameworks under UNESCO's Open Science Recommendation. Findings from the CS projects analysis revealed that: (a) there is inattention to developing the sub-components of the complex thinking macro-competency; (b) a growing trend to develop frameworks for CS projects is taking place; (c) there is a prevalence of CS project frameworks focused on prevention and control, project evaluation and design, and education and research; (d) a framework with three dimensions based on ToC (Outbound, Threshold and Full-cycle) can guide the development of CS projects; and (e) an eight-component typology can measure the progress and impact of CS projects from the perspectives of Context-awareness, Citizen engagement, Infrastructure leverage, Technological innovation, Educational innovation, Outreach and Scale, Network building, and Complex Thinking. We envision that the integrated framework and typology proposed, scaffolded by complex thinking, can comprehensively broaden the impact of CS initiatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民科学项目的门槛:作为整体发展驱动力的复杂思维
新兴技术和社区赋权推动了公民科学(CS)项目。然而,它们的影响仍然模糊,部分原因是在监测和规范这些项目方面存在困难。值得注意的是,发展公民的复杂思维并不在主要目标之列,尽管这与教育4.0的原则和培养具有社会责任感的公民有关。因此,我们提出了一个框架和类型学来促进CS项目,同时扩大复杂的思维。我们使用基于证据的教育创新(EBEI)方法和变革理论(ToC)视角,审查了教科文组织开放科学建议下一些最相关的框架。CS项目分析的结果显示:(a)对复杂思维宏观能力的子成分的开发不够重视;(b)为社会服务计划制订架构的趋势日益明显;(c)普遍存在以预防和控制、项目评估和设计以及教育和研究为重点的CS项目框架;(d)以ToC(出站量、阈值及全周期)为基础的三个维度架构,可指导CS项目的发展;(e)八组分类型可以从情境意识、公民参与、基础设施杠杆、技术创新、教育创新、外延和规模、网络建设和复杂思维等角度衡量CS项目的进展和影响。我们设想,在复杂思维的支撑下,提出的综合框架和类型学可以全面扩大CS倡议的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia
Ried-Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidencias de aprendizaje en prácticas educativas mediadas por tecnologías digitales Gamificación, pandemia y aprendizaje de la historia de las ideas. Experimentos en el contexto Core Currículum Estrategias de aprendizaje de estudiantes de Ingeniería en línea Digital Cognitive Maps for Scientific Knowledge Construction in Initial Teacher Education Realidad virtual para enseñar reanimación cardiopulmonar en el Grado de Educación Primaria. Estudio comparativo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1