Whose salad is organic? An attribute segmentation perspective-evidence from Albania

Q2 Social Sciences Economia Agro-Alimentare Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12285
Elena Kokthi, I. Canco, Eneida Topulli
{"title":"Whose salad is organic? An attribute segmentation perspective-evidence from Albania","authors":"Elena Kokthi, I. Canco, Eneida Topulli","doi":"10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic agriculture remains a black box attribute when considering consumer behaviour and preferences in developing countries. This is due partially to a lack of awareness about such products in addition to a lack of trust in relation to the certification bodies responsible. Meanwhile, increasing demand for these products comes as a result of food intolerance and hygiene safety issues. Through this framework it is crucial to clarify the concept from the consumer perspective. The objective of this paper is to understand consumer perceptions regarding organic attributes and identify the characteristics considered by consumers when buying organic products. The relative importance index shows the sensitivity of Albanian consumers in relation to the organic attribute, mainly in fruit and vegetables. Through the Contingent Valuation Method it is estimated that the consumer will pay an average premium of 27.7% for organic vegetables and 28.3% for organic fruit. The segmentation approach indicates that consumers linking organic attributes with health expressed a high willingness to pay for organic products. However, the majority use price as the main indicator of the quality of the product they consume; a higher price meaning an organic product. This conclusion is important in developing countries where consumers display low trust in food safety mechanisms and institutions.","PeriodicalId":37333,"journal":{"name":"Economia Agro-Alimentare","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia Agro-Alimentare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Organic agriculture remains a black box attribute when considering consumer behaviour and preferences in developing countries. This is due partially to a lack of awareness about such products in addition to a lack of trust in relation to the certification bodies responsible. Meanwhile, increasing demand for these products comes as a result of food intolerance and hygiene safety issues. Through this framework it is crucial to clarify the concept from the consumer perspective. The objective of this paper is to understand consumer perceptions regarding organic attributes and identify the characteristics considered by consumers when buying organic products. The relative importance index shows the sensitivity of Albanian consumers in relation to the organic attribute, mainly in fruit and vegetables. Through the Contingent Valuation Method it is estimated that the consumer will pay an average premium of 27.7% for organic vegetables and 28.3% for organic fruit. The segmentation approach indicates that consumers linking organic attributes with health expressed a high willingness to pay for organic products. However, the majority use price as the main indicator of the quality of the product they consume; a higher price meaning an organic product. This conclusion is important in developing countries where consumers display low trust in food safety mechanisms and institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁的沙拉是有机的?属性分割视角——来自阿尔巴尼亚的证据
考虑到发展中国家的消费者行为和偏好,有机农业仍然是一个黑箱属性。这部分是由于缺乏对此类产品的认识,以及对负责的认证机构缺乏信任。与此同时,由于食品不耐受和卫生安全问题,对这些产品的需求不断增加。通过这个框架,从消费者的角度来澄清这个概念是至关重要的。本文的目的是了解消费者对有机属性的看法,并确定消费者在购买有机产品时所考虑的特征。相对重要性指数显示阿尔巴尼亚消费者对有机属性的敏感性,主要是水果和蔬菜。通过条件估值法估计,消费者购买有机蔬菜的平均溢价为27.7%,购买有机水果的平均溢价为28.3%。细分方法表明,将有机属性与健康联系起来的消费者表达了购买有机产品的高意愿。然而,大多数人使用价格作为他们消费的产品质量的主要指标;更高的价格意味着有机产品。在消费者对食品安全机制和机构信任度较低的发展中国家,这一结论很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economia Agro-Alimentare
Economia Agro-Alimentare Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Economia agro-alimentare/Food Economy is a triannual peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Franco Angeli Edizioni on behalf of the Italian Society of Agri-food Economics (SIEA), founded in 1996 by the then President of SIEA Fausto Cantarelli. It offers an international forum for the discussion and analysis of mono and interdisciplinary socio-economic, political, legal and technical issues, related to agricultural and food systems. It welcomes submissions of original papers focusing on agriculture, food, natural resources, safety, nutrition and health, including all processes and infrastructure involved in providing food to populations; as well as the processes, inputs and outputs involved in consumption and disposal of food and food-related items. Analyses also include social, political, economic and environmental contexts and human resource challenges. Submissions should be addressed to an international audience of researchers, practitioners, and policy makers, and they may consider local, national, or global scales.
期刊最新文献
Advisors and inspectors for the development of organic agriculture in Italy Access to Technology to Increase Food Resilience in Rural Households in Indonesia What happened to the subjects? Questions about mezcal Determinants of Agri-food Investment from Fund Managers' Viewpoint Unearthing Unique Value: Exploring the Potential of Protected Designation of Origin on the Tangerine Industry of Patate, Tungurahua
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1