Quantifying visual preferences around the world

Katharina Reinecke, Krzysztof Z Gajos
{"title":"Quantifying visual preferences around the world","authors":"Katharina Reinecke, Krzysztof Z Gajos","doi":"10.1145/2556288.2557052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Website aesthetics have been recognized as an influential moderator of people's behavior and perception. However, what users perceive as \"good design\" is subject to individual preferences, questioning the feasibility of universal design guidelines. To better understand how people's visual preferences differ, we collected 2.4 million ratings of the visual appeal of websites from nearly 40 thousand participants of diverse backgrounds. We address several gaps in the knowledge about design preferences of previously understudied groups. Among other findings, our results show that the level of colorfulness and visual complexity at which visual appeal is highest strongly varies: Females, for example, liked colorful websites more than males. A high education level generally lowers this preference for colorfulness. Russians preferred a lower visual complexity, and Macedonians liked highly colorful designs more than any other country in our dataset. We contribute a computational model and estimates of peak appeal that can be used to support rapid evaluations of website design prototypes for specific target groups.","PeriodicalId":20599,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"132","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 132

Abstract

Website aesthetics have been recognized as an influential moderator of people's behavior and perception. However, what users perceive as "good design" is subject to individual preferences, questioning the feasibility of universal design guidelines. To better understand how people's visual preferences differ, we collected 2.4 million ratings of the visual appeal of websites from nearly 40 thousand participants of diverse backgrounds. We address several gaps in the knowledge about design preferences of previously understudied groups. Among other findings, our results show that the level of colorfulness and visual complexity at which visual appeal is highest strongly varies: Females, for example, liked colorful websites more than males. A high education level generally lowers this preference for colorfulness. Russians preferred a lower visual complexity, and Macedonians liked highly colorful designs more than any other country in our dataset. We contribute a computational model and estimates of peak appeal that can be used to support rapid evaluations of website design prototypes for specific target groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化世界各地的视觉偏好
网站美学被认为是影响人们行为和感知的重要因素。然而,用户所认为的“好设计”取决于个人偏好,质疑通用设计指南的可行性。为了更好地了解人们的视觉偏好是如何不同的,我们收集了近4万名不同背景的参与者对网站视觉吸引力的240万次评分。我们解决了以前未充分研究群体的设计偏好知识中的几个空白。在其他发现中,我们的结果表明,视觉吸引力最高的色彩和视觉复杂性水平差异很大:例如,女性比男性更喜欢色彩丰富的网站。较高的教育水平通常会降低这种对色彩的偏好。俄罗斯人喜欢较低的视觉复杂性,马其顿人比我们数据集中的任何其他国家都更喜欢色彩鲜艳的设计。我们提供了一个计算模型和峰值吸引力的估计,可用于支持针对特定目标群体的网站设计原型的快速评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception of ultrasonic haptic feedback on the hand: localisation and apparent motion Session details: The third dimension Motivating people with chronic pain to do physical activity: opportunities for technology design Goals and perceived success of online enterprise communities: what is important to leaders & members? Photographing information needs: the role of photos in experience sampling method-style research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1