Effects of an extubation readiness test protocol at a tertiary care fully outborn neonatal intensive care unit

H. Al Mandhari, M. Finelli, Shiyi Chen, C. Tomlinson, M. Nonoyama
{"title":"Effects of an extubation readiness test protocol at a tertiary care fully outborn neonatal intensive care unit","authors":"H. Al Mandhari, M. Finelli, Shiyi Chen, C. Tomlinson, M. Nonoyama","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2019-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives Extubation readiness testing (ERT) in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is highly variable and lacking standardized criteria. To address this gap, an evidence-based, inter-professionally developed ERT protocol was implemented to assess effectiveness on extubation failure within 72 h and on duration of intubation (DOI). Methods A longitudinal retrospective chart review in a level III, fully outborn NICU, of intubated infants admitted 1-year prior (Group 1), and 1 year after implementation (Group 2). Patients were extubated if they passed a 2-stage ERT protocol (3 min continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) followed by 7 min CPAP + pressure support). Descriptive, comparative statistics, and univariate and multiple logistic regression were completed on all patients and a ≤32 6/7 weeks subgroup (intubated at day-of-life 1); p < 0.05 is considered significant. Results All patients (n = 589 (n = 294 Group 1, n = 295 Group 2)) were included (preterm, intubated day of life one subgroup: n = 42 Group 1, n = 38 Group 2). For all patients, extubation failure decreased significantly from 9.9% to 4.1% (p = 0.006); Group 1 patients were 2.42 times more likely to experience extubation failure compared with Group 2. Extubation failure in the preterm subgroup decreased from 21.7% to 2.6% (p = 0.01); Group 1 patients were 10.71 times more likely to experience extubation failure. Median DOI was similar in both groups for all patients and in the preterm subgroup. Conclusions A unique two-stage ERT protocol was effective at reducing extubation failure rate, without increasing DOI, largely in preterm infants. The evidence-based, interprofessionally developed ERT protocol and its integration into the NICU culture largely contributed to its success.","PeriodicalId":9533,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","volume":"128 1","pages":"81 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2019-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background and objectives Extubation readiness testing (ERT) in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is highly variable and lacking standardized criteria. To address this gap, an evidence-based, inter-professionally developed ERT protocol was implemented to assess effectiveness on extubation failure within 72 h and on duration of intubation (DOI). Methods A longitudinal retrospective chart review in a level III, fully outborn NICU, of intubated infants admitted 1-year prior (Group 1), and 1 year after implementation (Group 2). Patients were extubated if they passed a 2-stage ERT protocol (3 min continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) followed by 7 min CPAP + pressure support). Descriptive, comparative statistics, and univariate and multiple logistic regression were completed on all patients and a ≤32 6/7 weeks subgroup (intubated at day-of-life 1); p < 0.05 is considered significant. Results All patients (n = 589 (n = 294 Group 1, n = 295 Group 2)) were included (preterm, intubated day of life one subgroup: n = 42 Group 1, n = 38 Group 2). For all patients, extubation failure decreased significantly from 9.9% to 4.1% (p = 0.006); Group 1 patients were 2.42 times more likely to experience extubation failure compared with Group 2. Extubation failure in the preterm subgroup decreased from 21.7% to 2.6% (p = 0.01); Group 1 patients were 10.71 times more likely to experience extubation failure. Median DOI was similar in both groups for all patients and in the preterm subgroup. Conclusions A unique two-stage ERT protocol was effective at reducing extubation failure rate, without increasing DOI, largely in preterm infants. The evidence-based, interprofessionally developed ERT protocol and its integration into the NICU culture largely contributed to its success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拔管准备测试方案在三级护理完全早产新生儿重症监护室的效果
背景和目的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)拔管准备测试(ERT)是高度可变的,缺乏标准化的标准。为了解决这一差距,实施了一项基于证据的跨专业开发的ERT协议,以评估72小时内拔管失败和插管持续时间(DOI)的有效性。方法对1年前(第1组)和实施后1年(第2组)的III级全外产NICU插管婴儿进行纵向回顾性图表回顾。如果患者通过2期ERT方案(3分钟持续气道正压通气(CPAP),然后7分钟CPAP +压力支持),则拔管。对所有患者和≤32 6/7周亚组(在出生第1天插管)进行描述性、比较统计、单因素和多因素logistic回归;P < 0.05为显著性。结果纳入所有患者(n = 589例(n = 294组1,n = 295组2))(早产,插管生存日1亚组:n = 42组1,n = 38组2)。所有患者拔管失败率由9.9%显著降低至4.1% (p = 0.006);1组患者拔管失败的发生率是2组的2.42倍。早产儿亚组拔管失败率由21.7%降至2.6% (p = 0.01);1组患者拔管失败的可能性是对照组的10.71倍。两组中所有患者和早产儿亚组的DOI中位数相似。结论:一种独特的两阶段ERT方案可有效降低拔管失败率,而不增加DOI,主要用于早产儿。以证据为基础的跨专业开发的ERT方案及其与NICU文化的融合在很大程度上促成了其成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A cross-sectional survey on the effects of ambient temperature and humidity on health outcomes in individuals with chronic respiratory disease Impact of telephone follow-up on COPD outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation patients: A randomized clinical trial A survey on the attitudinal differences between acute and community settings Strategies to achieve adherence to prone positioning in awake COVID-19 patients with high-flow nasal oxygen. A case series Winning Posters from the Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists 2022 Annual Conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1