Adaptation of the CarFreeMe driver retirement intervention to provide driving cessation support to older people living with dementia

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI:10.1017/BrImp.2020.16
T. Scott, J. Liddle, R. Sidhu, G. Mitchell, E. Beattie, L. Gustafsson, N. Pachana
{"title":"Adaptation of the CarFreeMe driver retirement intervention to provide driving cessation support to older people living with dementia","authors":"T. Scott, J. Liddle, R. Sidhu, G. Mitchell, E. Beattie, L. Gustafsson, N. Pachana","doi":"10.1017/BrImp.2020.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Driving and stopping driving present challenging issues for older people living with memory problems and the family members supporting them. Changes to driving status impact the individual stopping driving and their family members. CarFreeMe is an existing, effective driving cessation program for older people that may be applicable to older people living with dementia. The purpose of this study was to adapt the program and explore feasibility and key stakeholder perspectives. Methods: The Medical Research Council guidelines for conducting research into complex interventions guided the development, acceptability and feasibility piloting. A multidisciplinary approach was taken, and key stakeholders were involved throughout the process. This included an adaptation process, followed by expert reference group feedback and case series pilot study. Results: The background research indicated that some key changes were required to meet the needs of people living with dementia. Aspects of the content, language, format and activities were adapted and an additional module was created for family members – whose involvement was identified as important. A more personalized, flexible approach was recommended. The expert reference group [psychologists (n = 2), occupational therapists (n = 3) and dementia behavior consultants (n = 2)] indicated the program was appropriate and needed, and made recommendations for feasibility. Pilot testing with three families indicated acceptability. Conclusion: A driving cessation program adapted for use with people living with dementia and their families required some changes to meet the needs and situations based on feedback from key stakeholders. Future studies will evaluate implementation outcomes across a range of settings.","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"45 1","pages":"247 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2020.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Driving and stopping driving present challenging issues for older people living with memory problems and the family members supporting them. Changes to driving status impact the individual stopping driving and their family members. CarFreeMe is an existing, effective driving cessation program for older people that may be applicable to older people living with dementia. The purpose of this study was to adapt the program and explore feasibility and key stakeholder perspectives. Methods: The Medical Research Council guidelines for conducting research into complex interventions guided the development, acceptability and feasibility piloting. A multidisciplinary approach was taken, and key stakeholders were involved throughout the process. This included an adaptation process, followed by expert reference group feedback and case series pilot study. Results: The background research indicated that some key changes were required to meet the needs of people living with dementia. Aspects of the content, language, format and activities were adapted and an additional module was created for family members – whose involvement was identified as important. A more personalized, flexible approach was recommended. The expert reference group [psychologists (n = 2), occupational therapists (n = 3) and dementia behavior consultants (n = 2)] indicated the program was appropriate and needed, and made recommendations for feasibility. Pilot testing with three families indicated acceptability. Conclusion: A driving cessation program adapted for use with people living with dementia and their families required some changes to meet the needs and situations based on feedback from key stakeholders. Future studies will evaluate implementation outcomes across a range of settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整CarFreeMe司机退休干预,为老年痴呆症患者提供停止驾驶的支持
摘要目的:驾驶和停止驾驶是老年人记忆障碍患者及其家属面临的具有挑战性的问题。驾驶状态的改变会影响停止驾驶的个人及其家庭成员。CarFreeMe是一个现有的,有效的老年人驾驶戒烟计划,可能适用于老年痴呆症患者。本研究的目的是调整该计划,并探讨可行性和关键利益相关者的观点。方法:以医学研究委员会开展复杂干预措施研究的指南为指导,开展可接受性和可行性试点。采取了多学科方法,并在整个过程中涉及关键利益相关者。这包括一个适应过程,随后是专家参考小组反馈和案例系列试点研究。结果:背景研究表明,需要进行一些关键的改变,以满足痴呆症患者的需求。内容、语言、形式和活动的各个方面都进行了调整,并为家庭成员增设了一个模块,家庭成员的参与被认为是重要的。建议采取更加个性化和灵活的办法。专家参照组[心理学家(n = 2)、职业治疗师(n = 3)和痴呆症行为咨询师(n = 2)]认为该方案是适当的和必要的,并提出可行性建议。三个家庭的试点测试表明是可接受的。结论:根据关键利益相关者的反馈,一个适合于痴呆症患者及其家庭使用的戒烟计划需要做出一些改变,以满足需求和情况。未来的研究将评估一系列环境下的实施结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
期刊最新文献
Efficiency of telerehabilitation on subacute stroke ambulation: a matched case-control study. Challenging behaviour, activity, and participation following acquired brain injury: a scoping review of interventions delivered by allied health professionals. Views of speech pathology educators on a learning resource for cognitive-communication disorders: a user survey of TBIBank Grand Rounds. 'Would you take a drug for this?': attitudes by individuals with traumatic brain injury towards medication to improve social functioning. Association between adequate protein intake and quadriceps quantity and quality during rehabilitation in people with subacute stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1