Community-Based Learning for International Graduate Students: Impact and Implications

Linyuan Guo-Brennan, C. VanLeeuwen, Mary M. MacPhee, Michael Guo-Brennan
{"title":"Community-Based Learning for International Graduate Students: Impact and Implications","authors":"Linyuan Guo-Brennan, C. VanLeeuwen, Mary M. MacPhee, Michael Guo-Brennan","doi":"10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0026.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating community- based learning (CBL) into graduate education has gained attention in higher education during the past decade because CBL allows students to inculcate professional values and ethics, situate academic knowledge and understanding in contexts, and practice academic citizenship through serving communities with disciplinary knowledge and skills. In a North American higher education context, about half of the graduate student population are international students, who have needs in several areas. How-ever, their experiences in CBL are under- investigated and scarcely documented in existing literature and scholarship in either community- based learning or international education. Drawing on international students’ experiences in a graduate program infused with CBL components in Canadian higher education, this mixed methods case study examined the impact of CBL on international students’ developments in five areas: academic, sociocultural, personal, professional, and global citizenship. Through discussions on the benefit, barriers, and implications of providing CBL to international graduate students, this article offers recommendations for improved higher education policy, programs, and praxis to make CBL more inclusive and responsive to international graduate students. not tied to a specific course or program. This article reports a mixed meth ods case study examining the impact of CBL on international graduate students at a Canadian public university. Beginning with a brief review of the research context, methodology, and methods, the article reports findings on students’ perceptions of CBL and the impact of CBL on international graduate students in five areas: academic, sociocultural, personal, professional, and global citizenship development. The article then discusses the impli cations for higher education institutions (HEIs) and offers recommendations on CBL program development in graduate education and future research possibilities. Findings shed light on the pitfalls and opportunities of enhancing the inclusivity and responsiveness of a CBL program and praxis in a HEI with a large number of international graduate students.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/MJCSLOA.3239521.0026.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Integrating community- based learning (CBL) into graduate education has gained attention in higher education during the past decade because CBL allows students to inculcate professional values and ethics, situate academic knowledge and understanding in contexts, and practice academic citizenship through serving communities with disciplinary knowledge and skills. In a North American higher education context, about half of the graduate student population are international students, who have needs in several areas. How-ever, their experiences in CBL are under- investigated and scarcely documented in existing literature and scholarship in either community- based learning or international education. Drawing on international students’ experiences in a graduate program infused with CBL components in Canadian higher education, this mixed methods case study examined the impact of CBL on international students’ developments in five areas: academic, sociocultural, personal, professional, and global citizenship. Through discussions on the benefit, barriers, and implications of providing CBL to international graduate students, this article offers recommendations for improved higher education policy, programs, and praxis to make CBL more inclusive and responsive to international graduate students. not tied to a specific course or program. This article reports a mixed meth ods case study examining the impact of CBL on international graduate students at a Canadian public university. Beginning with a brief review of the research context, methodology, and methods, the article reports findings on students’ perceptions of CBL and the impact of CBL on international graduate students in five areas: academic, sociocultural, personal, professional, and global citizenship development. The article then discusses the impli cations for higher education institutions (HEIs) and offers recommendations on CBL program development in graduate education and future research possibilities. Findings shed light on the pitfalls and opportunities of enhancing the inclusivity and responsiveness of a CBL program and praxis in a HEI with a large number of international graduate students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于社区的国际研究生学习:影响与启示
在过去的十年中,将基于社区的学习(CBL)整合到研究生教育中已经引起了高等教育的关注,因为CBL允许学生灌输专业价值观和道德,将学术知识和理解置于环境中,并通过用学科知识和技能服务社区来实践学术公民。在北美高等教育的背景下,大约一半的研究生是国际学生,他们在几个领域有需求。然而,无论是社区学习还是国际教育,他们在CBL方面的经验都没有得到充分的调查,而且在现有的文献和学术研究中几乎没有记录。利用国际学生在加拿大高等教育中融入CBL成分的研究生课程中的经验,这个混合方法的案例研究考察了CBL对国际学生在五个方面的发展的影响:学术、社会文化、个人、专业和全球公民。通过讨论向国际研究生提供CBL的好处、障碍和影响,本文提出了改进高等教育政策、项目和实践的建议,以使CBL更具包容性和对国际研究生的响应。与特定的课程或项目无关的。本文报告了一个混合方法的案例研究,研究了CBL对加拿大一所公立大学国际研究生的影响。本文首先简要回顾了研究背景、方法和方法,然后从学术、社会文化、个人、专业和全球公民发展五个方面报告了学生对CBL的看法以及CBL对国际研究生的影响。然后,本文讨论了对高等教育机构(HEIs)的启示,并对研究生教育中CBL项目的发展和未来的研究可能性提出了建议。研究结果揭示了在拥有大量国际研究生的高等教育机构中,提高CBL项目和实践的包容性和响应性存在的缺陷和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1