A new PET for Data Collection via Forms with Data Minimization, Full Accuracy and Informed Consent

N. Anciaux, S. Frittella, Baptiste Joffroy, Benjamin Nguyen, Guillaume Scerri
{"title":"A new PET for Data Collection via Forms with Data Minimization, Full Accuracy and Informed Consent","authors":"N. Anciaux, S. Frittella, Baptiste Joffroy, Benjamin Nguyen, Guillaume Scerri","doi":"10.48786/edbt.2024.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of privacy laws and principles such as data minimization and informed consent are supposed to protect citizens from over-collection of personal data. Nevertheless, current processes, mainly through filling forms are still based on practices that lead to over-collection. Indeed, any citizen wishing to apply for a benefit (or service) will transmit all their personal data involved in the evaluation of the eligibility criteria. The resulting problem of over-collection affects millions of individuals, with considerable volumes of information collected. If this problem of compliance concerns both public and private organizations (e.g., social services, banks, insurance companies), it is because it faces non-trivial issues, which hinder the implementation of data minimization by developers. In this paper, we propose a new modeling approach that enables data minimization and informed choices for the users, for any decision problem modeled using classical logic, which covers a wide range of practical cases. Our data minimization solution uses game theoretic notions to explain and quantify the privacy payoff for the user. We show how our algorithms can be applied to practical cases study as a new PET for minimal, fully accurate (all due services must be preserved) and informed data collection.","PeriodicalId":88813,"journal":{"name":"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology","volume":"57 1","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48786/edbt.2024.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The advent of privacy laws and principles such as data minimization and informed consent are supposed to protect citizens from over-collection of personal data. Nevertheless, current processes, mainly through filling forms are still based on practices that lead to over-collection. Indeed, any citizen wishing to apply for a benefit (or service) will transmit all their personal data involved in the evaluation of the eligibility criteria. The resulting problem of over-collection affects millions of individuals, with considerable volumes of information collected. If this problem of compliance concerns both public and private organizations (e.g., social services, banks, insurance companies), it is because it faces non-trivial issues, which hinder the implementation of data minimization by developers. In this paper, we propose a new modeling approach that enables data minimization and informed choices for the users, for any decision problem modeled using classical logic, which covers a wide range of practical cases. Our data minimization solution uses game theoretic notions to explain and quantify the privacy payoff for the user. We show how our algorithms can be applied to practical cases study as a new PET for minimal, fully accurate (all due services must be preserved) and informed data collection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个新的PET通过数据最小化,完全准确和知情同意的表格收集数据
隐私法和数据最小化和知情同意等原则的出现,本应保护公民免受个人数据的过度收集。然而,目前的流程,主要是通过填写表格,仍然基于导致过度收集的做法。事实上,任何希望申请福利(或服务)的公民都将提交所有涉及资格标准评估的个人数据。由此产生的过度收集问题影响了数百万个人,收集了大量信息。如果这个遵从性问题涉及公共和私人组织(例如,社会服务、银行、保险公司),那是因为它面临着一些重要的问题,这些问题阻碍了开发人员实现数据最小化。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的建模方法,可以为用户提供数据最小化和知情选择,适用于使用经典逻辑建模的任何决策问题,该方法涵盖了广泛的实际案例。我们的数据最小化解决方案使用博弈论概念来解释和量化用户的隐私回报。我们展示了如何将我们的算法应用于实际案例研究,作为一种新的PET,以实现最小的、完全准确的(所有应有的服务必须保留)和知情的数据收集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computing Generic Abstractions from Application Datasets Fair Spatial Indexing: A paradigm for Group Spatial Fairness. Data Coverage for Detecting Representation Bias in Image Datasets: A Crowdsourcing Approach Auditing for Spatial Fairness TransEdge: Supporting Efficient Read Queries Across Untrusted Edge Nodes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1