CYCLIC TESTING OF 1:40 SCALE CANTILEVER RC ELEMENTS WITH DIGITALLY MANUFACTURED REINFORCEMENT

L. Giudice, R. Wróbel, Antonios A. Katsamakas, C. Leinenbach, Michalis F. Vassiliou
{"title":"CYCLIC TESTING OF 1:40 SCALE CANTILEVER RC ELEMENTS WITH DIGITALLY MANUFACTURED REINFORCEMENT","authors":"L. Giudice, R. Wróbel, Antonios A. Katsamakas, C. Leinenbach, Michalis F. Vassiliou","doi":"10.7712/120121.8545.18965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time history analysis is considered as the state-of-the-art in modeling of the seismic response of RC structures. Its validation involves predicting the response of an RC structure tested on a shaking table. However, blind prediction contests show that most contestants fail to predict the seismic response of the tested specimens. Given that numerical models are able to accurately capture the behavior of RC members at a component level, we can conclude that a large part of the error sources from the assumptions made to pass from component level to system level, i.e. assumptions related to damping formulation, component interaction, boundary conditions etc. In parallel, the prediction of the response of a structure subjected to a single ground motion has been proven to be too strict of a validation procedure. Oftentimes, a statistical approach involving many specimens and ground motions is necessary. Such an approach is clearly only feasible at a very small scale. At such scales, the reinforcement fabrication and positioning become major issues. We propose to use additive manufacturing technology to digitally fabricate the reinforcement cage necessary for the micro RC element. This paper presents the results from cyclic tests on 1:40 scale RC cantilever columns. The reinforcing cages were manufactured using a Selective Laser Melting 3D printer that was able to print rebars with submillimeter diameter and yield strength 378MPa. Two different microconcrete mixtures were used based on cement and gypsum. Each sample was reinforced with 18 longitudinal rebars of 0.6mm diameter, and 0.35mm stirrups with 2.5mm of spacing. The cyclic behavior of the columns closely resembles the behavior of full-scale columns indicating that such small-scale specimens can be used of the statistical validation of global level assumptions that numerical models make.","PeriodicalId":66281,"journal":{"name":"地震工程与工程振动","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"地震工程与工程振动","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120121.8545.18965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time history analysis is considered as the state-of-the-art in modeling of the seismic response of RC structures. Its validation involves predicting the response of an RC structure tested on a shaking table. However, blind prediction contests show that most contestants fail to predict the seismic response of the tested specimens. Given that numerical models are able to accurately capture the behavior of RC members at a component level, we can conclude that a large part of the error sources from the assumptions made to pass from component level to system level, i.e. assumptions related to damping formulation, component interaction, boundary conditions etc. In parallel, the prediction of the response of a structure subjected to a single ground motion has been proven to be too strict of a validation procedure. Oftentimes, a statistical approach involving many specimens and ground motions is necessary. Such an approach is clearly only feasible at a very small scale. At such scales, the reinforcement fabrication and positioning become major issues. We propose to use additive manufacturing technology to digitally fabricate the reinforcement cage necessary for the micro RC element. This paper presents the results from cyclic tests on 1:40 scale RC cantilever columns. The reinforcing cages were manufactured using a Selective Laser Melting 3D printer that was able to print rebars with submillimeter diameter and yield strength 378MPa. Two different microconcrete mixtures were used based on cement and gypsum. Each sample was reinforced with 18 longitudinal rebars of 0.6mm diameter, and 0.35mm stirrups with 2.5mm of spacing. The cyclic behavior of the columns closely resembles the behavior of full-scale columns indicating that such small-scale specimens can be used of the statistical validation of global level assumptions that numerical models make.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字制造钢筋的1:40比例悬臂钢筋混凝土构件的循环试验
时程分析被认为是钢筋混凝土结构地震反应建模的最先进方法。其验证包括预测RC结构在振动台上的响应。然而,盲预测竞赛表明,大多数参赛者无法预测被试的地震反应。鉴于数值模型能够准确地捕捉构件级RC构件的行为,我们可以得出结论,大部分误差来自于从构件级传递到系统级的假设,即与阻尼公式、构件相互作用、边界条件等有关的假设。与此同时,预测结构在单一地面运动下的响应已被证明是过于严格的验证程序。通常,一种涉及许多标本和地面运动的统计方法是必要的。这种方法显然只在非常小的范围内可行。在这种规模下,钢筋的制造和定位成为主要问题。我们建议使用增材制造技术来数字化制造微型RC元件所需的钢筋笼。本文介绍了1:40比例尺钢筋混凝土悬臂梁的循环试验结果。钢筋笼是使用选择性激光熔化3D打印机制造的,该打印机能够打印直径为亚毫米的钢筋,屈服强度为378MPa。在水泥和石膏的基础上使用了两种不同的微混凝土混合物。每个试件采用18根直径为0.6mm的纵筋和0.35mm间距为2.5mm的马镫进行加固。柱的循环行为与全尺寸柱的行为非常相似,表明这种小规模的样本可以用于数值模型所做的全球水平假设的统计验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4781
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
GENETIC OPTIMIZATION FOR THE DESIGN OF SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF PLANE RC FRAMES WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES (BRBS) LARGE-DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURES: COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS AND DEM MODELS INCLUDING OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CYCLIC TESTING OF 1:40 SCALE CANTILEVER RC ELEMENTS WITH DIGITALLY MANUFACTURED REINFORCEMENT 3D ROCKING MOTION: BLIND PREDICTION CONTEST RESULTS AND INFLUENCE OF EVALUATION METRIC ON THE RANKINGS EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PLASTIC CYCLIC BEHAVIOUR OF SIMPLE STEEL COUPONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1