Evaluation of tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium solani in Virginia-type tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) varieties under controlled conditions in Northwestern Argentina

L. Berruezo, E. Harries, M. Galván, S. Stenglein, G. M. Mercado Cárdenas
{"title":"Evaluation of tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium solani in Virginia-type tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) varieties under controlled conditions in Northwestern Argentina","authors":"L. Berruezo, E. Harries, M. Galván, S. Stenglein, G. M. Mercado Cárdenas","doi":"10.48162/rev.39.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) in Argentina is centered in the northwestern region (NWA), where the incidence of root rots and stem diseases caused by Fusarium spp. has increased considerably in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenicity levels of isolates of the F. oxysporum and F. solani complexes in different varieties of Virginia Type tobacco. The commercial varieties MB47, PVH229, NC71, K346, K326, and K394 were inoculated with six isolates of both complexes. The variables evaluated were the incidence and severity of the symptoms. The area under the disease progress curves (AUDPC) was calculated and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Also, disease epidemiological models were fitted to the experimental data. The MB47 variety was significantly less infected and the varieties K346, K326, and K394 had the highest AUDPC means, showing susceptibility to the isolates. The disease intensity curves were adequately described by the monomolecular and logistic models. The results provide, for the first time, information about the levels of tolerance to vascular wilt and root rot under controlled conditions for the main varieties of Virginia-type tobacco grown in NWA.\nHighlights:\n\nFOSC isolates produced mainly wilting, chlorosis, and growth reduction in tobacco plants; in contrast, FSSC isolates caused root rot, with characteristic necrotic lesions and root rot symptoms.\nThe highest DSI scores were registered for Fo27 and Fo15, while the lowest DSI score was found for Fs98.\nThe results obtained from the DSI scores were related to the mean AUDPC values of the isolates.\nMB47 and NC71 were significantly less infected than the other varieties, which registered low AUDPC values.\n","PeriodicalId":21210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The production of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) in Argentina is centered in the northwestern region (NWA), where the incidence of root rots and stem diseases caused by Fusarium spp. has increased considerably in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenicity levels of isolates of the F. oxysporum and F. solani complexes in different varieties of Virginia Type tobacco. The commercial varieties MB47, PVH229, NC71, K346, K326, and K394 were inoculated with six isolates of both complexes. The variables evaluated were the incidence and severity of the symptoms. The area under the disease progress curves (AUDPC) was calculated and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Also, disease epidemiological models were fitted to the experimental data. The MB47 variety was significantly less infected and the varieties K346, K326, and K394 had the highest AUDPC means, showing susceptibility to the isolates. The disease intensity curves were adequately described by the monomolecular and logistic models. The results provide, for the first time, information about the levels of tolerance to vascular wilt and root rot under controlled conditions for the main varieties of Virginia-type tobacco grown in NWA. Highlights: FOSC isolates produced mainly wilting, chlorosis, and growth reduction in tobacco plants; in contrast, FSSC isolates caused root rot, with characteristic necrotic lesions and root rot symptoms. The highest DSI scores were registered for Fo27 and Fo15, while the lowest DSI score was found for Fs98. The results obtained from the DSI scores were related to the mean AUDPC values of the isolates. MB47 and NC71 were significantly less infected than the other varieties, which registered low AUDPC values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷西北部可控条件下弗吉尼亚型烟草品种对尖孢镰刀菌和茄枯菌的耐受性评价
阿根廷烟草(Nicotiana tabacum L.)的生产主要集中在西北地区(NWA),近年来该地区镰刀菌引起的根腐病和茎病发病率显著增加。本研究旨在评价尖孢镰刀菌和番茄镰刀菌复合菌株在不同品种弗吉尼亚型烟草中的致病性水平。对商品品种MB47、PVH229、NC71、K346、K326和K394分别接种这两种复合物的6个分离株。评估的变量是症状的发生率和严重程度。计算疾病进展曲线下面积(AUDPC)并进行方差分析。对实验数据进行了疾病流行病学模型拟合。MB47的侵染率较低,K346、K326和K394的AUDPC均值最高,显示出对菌株的敏感性。单分子模型和logistic模型充分描述了疾病强度曲线。该结果首次提供了西北地区主要品种对维吉尼亚型烟草在控制条件下的抗血管性枯萎病和根腐病水平的信息。重点:FOSC分离株主要引起烟草植株萎蔫、黄化和生长减少;相反,FSSC分离株引起根腐病,具有特征性的坏死病变和根腐病症状。DSI得分最高的是f27和f15,而DSI得分最低的是Fs98。从DSI评分得到的结果与分离株的平均AUDPC值相关。MB47和NC71的侵染率明显低于其他品种,其AUDPC值较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hazard indicators in urban trees. Case studies on Platanus x hispanica Mill. ex Münchh and Morus alba L. in Mendoza city-Argentina Volunteer soybean (Glycine max) interference in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) crops: ethoxysulfuron and halosulfuron critical level of damage and selectivity Effect of yeast and mycorrhizae inoculation on tomato production under normal and water stress conditions Apple (Malus domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis) yield prediction after tree image analysis Efficacy of zinc lactate and Lactobacillus bulgaricus on nutrition and health of broiler chickens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1