Comparative Study on Phytochemical Properties and Antifungal Activities of Different Plant Extracts on Infected Fruit of Carica papaya

N. Philip, J. Okon, E. Okey
{"title":"Comparative Study on Phytochemical Properties and Antifungal Activities of Different Plant Extracts on Infected Fruit of Carica papaya","authors":"N. Philip, J. Okon, E. Okey","doi":"10.9734/ajob/2022/v15i330239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparative studies of phytochemical properties and antifungal activities of different plant extracts; Ageratum conyzoides L., Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn, Senna alata (L.) Roxb. and Mangifera indica L. on infected fruit of Carica papaya was carried out using standard methods for analysis of all the tested parameters. The test was conducted using the selected plant extracts at five different concentrations (100 - 500mg/ml) against the isolated fungi. Molecular analysis was done to identify the isolated fungi. The results of the qualitative phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloid, tannins, saponins, phenols and flavonoid in all the plant extracts. The quantitative phytochemical screening results showed varying quantities of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, flavonoids and phenols present in the extracts. The quantitative screening showed that A. conyzoides had the highest quantity of the constituents present in its extracts. Four fungal pathogens were isolated from paw-paw fruits and were identified as Rhizopus species, Aspergillus glavus, Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium species. The results of the antimicrobial assay on fungi isolated from infected pawpaw fruits showed that inhibition of fungal growth increased with a corresponding increase in concentration for all the fungal isolates. Penicillium species showed resistance to all the extracts. A. conyzoides showed the highest inhibition from 200mg/ml for the isolates followed by P.amarus. Molecular analysis identified the isolates as Rhizopus arrhizopus, R. delemar, R. oryzae and Aspergillus clavatus. The phylogenetic tree showed that Rhizopus oryzae, R. delemar, R arrhizus are closely related. A. conyzoides and P. amarus can be used to minimize the infection of paw-paw fruit by microbes.","PeriodicalId":8477,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Cell Biology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajob/2022/v15i330239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comparative studies of phytochemical properties and antifungal activities of different plant extracts; Ageratum conyzoides L., Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn, Senna alata (L.) Roxb. and Mangifera indica L. on infected fruit of Carica papaya was carried out using standard methods for analysis of all the tested parameters. The test was conducted using the selected plant extracts at five different concentrations (100 - 500mg/ml) against the isolated fungi. Molecular analysis was done to identify the isolated fungi. The results of the qualitative phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloid, tannins, saponins, phenols and flavonoid in all the plant extracts. The quantitative phytochemical screening results showed varying quantities of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, flavonoids and phenols present in the extracts. The quantitative screening showed that A. conyzoides had the highest quantity of the constituents present in its extracts. Four fungal pathogens were isolated from paw-paw fruits and were identified as Rhizopus species, Aspergillus glavus, Aspergillus flavus and Penicillium species. The results of the antimicrobial assay on fungi isolated from infected pawpaw fruits showed that inhibition of fungal growth increased with a corresponding increase in concentration for all the fungal isolates. Penicillium species showed resistance to all the extracts. A. conyzoides showed the highest inhibition from 200mg/ml for the isolates followed by P.amarus. Molecular analysis identified the isolates as Rhizopus arrhizopus, R. delemar, R. oryzae and Aspergillus clavatus. The phylogenetic tree showed that Rhizopus oryzae, R. delemar, R arrhizus are closely related. A. conyzoides and P. amarus can be used to minimize the infection of paw-paw fruit by microbes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同植物提取物对番木瓜侵染果实的植物化学性质及抑菌活性比较研究
不同植物提取物的植物化学性质及抗真菌活性比较研究圆锥菊,叶子花。塞纳·阿拉塔(L.)Roxb。采用标准方法对番木瓜侵染果实上的芒果毒进行了各试验参数的分析。选用5种不同浓度的植物提取物(100 ~ 500mg/ml)对分离的真菌进行实验。对分离真菌进行了分子鉴定。定性植物化学筛选结果显示,所有植物提取物中均含有生物碱、单宁、皂苷、酚类和类黄酮。定量植物化学筛选结果显示,提取物中含有不同数量的生物碱、单宁、皂苷、黄酮类和酚类物质。定量筛选结果表明,金合欢提取物中所含成分含量最高。从木瓜果实中分离到4种病原菌,鉴定为根霉属、牛曲霉属、黄曲霉属和青霉属。对侵染木瓜果实中分离的真菌进行抑菌试验,结果表明,各菌株对真菌生长的抑制作用随菌株浓度的增加而增强。青霉菌对所有提取物均有抗性。conyzoides的抑菌率最高,为200mg/ml;分子分析鉴定分离物为根霉、delemar根霉、米霉和棒曲霉。系统发育树分析结果表明,米根霉、delemar根霉和根霉亲缘关系较近。利用合子拟合螨和小绒拟合螨可以减少微生物对木瓜果实的侵染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phytoremediation Indices of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Growing in Panteka Stream, Kaduna, Nigeria Community Composition and Dynamics of Butterflies in Different Microhabitats of Central Aravalli Hill Regions of Ajmer District, Rajasthan, India Study on the Correlation of Insect Pest Infestation of Guinea Corn (Sorghum bicolor) Stored in Kasarawa and Kuffa Food Ware-Houses in Sokoto Metropolis, Sokoto State, Nigeria Life Beyond Retinal Surgery: A Survey Genetic Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from the Population of Southern Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1