Audience Participation in Contemporary Lithuanian Theatre: A Conflicted Adaptation of the Western Tradition

Q3 Arts and Humanities Art History and Criticism Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.2478/mik-2019-0008
Justinas Kalinauskas
{"title":"Audience Participation in Contemporary Lithuanian Theatre: A Conflicted Adaptation of the Western Tradition","authors":"Justinas Kalinauskas","doi":"10.2478/mik-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary This article explores how audience participation practices were introduced into Lithuanian theatre in the last three decades (between the early ‘90s and the late 2010s) and how the audience participation methods of the 1960s Western theatre are/were being implemented into contemporary Lithuanian theatre projects. The key goal of this article is to examine the evolution of audience participation and collective theatre tradition in Lithuanian theatre by analysing the preconditions for participatory practices in the country’s theatre scene and defining the scope and contradictions of participation in the latest examples of contemporary Lithuanian theatre practices. These contradictions are also apparent in contemporary Western performative practices, which have already distanced themselves from the collective theatre movement of the ‘60s and the ‘70s and the political agenda of the performances of that time, selectively retaining only limited participatory aspects of the environmental theatre culture as a new form of entertainment. Similar limited levels of participation in Lithuanian theatre can be based on a different premise—that changes in spectators’ habitude cannot catch up with the newly (re)introduced theatrical ideas after the 1990s, and that theatre creators are still trying to cautiously synchronise conventional observation tactics and modern theatre hierarchies with the interactive ones, thus slowing down changes in staging and spectatorship strategies as well. The article focuses on academic texts by Lithuanian theatre researchers Ramunė Balevičiūtė, Rasa Vasinauskaitė, Rūta Mažeikienė, Jurgita Staniškytė, Vaidas Jauniškis, Lina Michelkevičė, and others to illustrate the discourse of audience participation analysis and to present different stages of the participatory tradition in the historiography of Lithuanian theatre. For international context, history, and mechanics of audience participation, texts by Erika Fischer-Lichte, Michael Kirby, Richard Schechner, Gareth White, Gay McAuley, Johan Huizinga, and others are used.","PeriodicalId":36225,"journal":{"name":"Art History and Criticism","volume":"41 1","pages":"103 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History and Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary This article explores how audience participation practices were introduced into Lithuanian theatre in the last three decades (between the early ‘90s and the late 2010s) and how the audience participation methods of the 1960s Western theatre are/were being implemented into contemporary Lithuanian theatre projects. The key goal of this article is to examine the evolution of audience participation and collective theatre tradition in Lithuanian theatre by analysing the preconditions for participatory practices in the country’s theatre scene and defining the scope and contradictions of participation in the latest examples of contemporary Lithuanian theatre practices. These contradictions are also apparent in contemporary Western performative practices, which have already distanced themselves from the collective theatre movement of the ‘60s and the ‘70s and the political agenda of the performances of that time, selectively retaining only limited participatory aspects of the environmental theatre culture as a new form of entertainment. Similar limited levels of participation in Lithuanian theatre can be based on a different premise—that changes in spectators’ habitude cannot catch up with the newly (re)introduced theatrical ideas after the 1990s, and that theatre creators are still trying to cautiously synchronise conventional observation tactics and modern theatre hierarchies with the interactive ones, thus slowing down changes in staging and spectatorship strategies as well. The article focuses on academic texts by Lithuanian theatre researchers Ramunė Balevičiūtė, Rasa Vasinauskaitė, Rūta Mažeikienė, Jurgita Staniškytė, Vaidas Jauniškis, Lina Michelkevičė, and others to illustrate the discourse of audience participation analysis and to present different stages of the participatory tradition in the historiography of Lithuanian theatre. For international context, history, and mechanics of audience participation, texts by Erika Fischer-Lichte, Michael Kirby, Richard Schechner, Gareth White, Gay McAuley, Johan Huizinga, and others are used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代立陶宛戏剧的观众参与:西方传统的冲突改编
本文探讨了在过去三十年中(90年代初至2010年代末),立陶宛戏剧是如何引入观众参与实践的,以及20世纪60年代西方戏剧的观众参与方法是如何被实施到当代立陶宛戏剧项目中的。本文的主要目标是通过分析立陶宛戏剧中参与性实践的先决条件,并定义当代立陶宛戏剧实践的最新例子中参与的范围和矛盾,来研究立陶宛戏剧中观众参与和集体戏剧传统的演变。这些矛盾在当代西方表演实践中也很明显,它们已经与60年代和70年代的集体戏剧运动以及当时表演的政治议程拉开了距离,有选择地保留了环境戏剧文化作为一种新的娱乐形式的有限参与方面。立陶宛戏剧中类似的有限参与程度可以基于一个不同的前提——观众习惯的变化无法跟上20世纪90年代后新引入的戏剧理念,戏剧创作者仍在努力谨慎地将传统的观察策略和现代戏剧等级与互动策略同步,从而减缓了舞台和观众策略的变化。本文着重于立陶宛戏剧研究人员ramun立陶宛Balevičiūtė、Rasa vasinauskait立陶宛、Rūta Mažeikienė、Jurgita Staniškytė、Vaidas Jauniškis、Lina michelkevi等人的学术文献,以说明观众参与分析的话语,并呈现立陶宛戏剧史学中参与传统的不同阶段。对于国际背景,历史和观众参与的机制,使用了Erika Fischer-Lichte, Michael Kirby, Richard Schechner, Gareth White, Gay McAuley, Johan Huizinga等人的文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Art History and Criticism
Art History and Criticism Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Watercolours and Drawings of Count Konstanty Tyzenhauz – the Romanticised Testimony of the Time Modernist Genius in the Light of the Reception of Georgia O’Keeffe’s Work A Critique on Authenticity and Integrity in Reconstruction: Perception of Architectural Heritage and Cities of Postwar Era from Europe Adaptations of Prosper Mérimée’s “The Bear” in Different Media and Genres: Correction and Recontextualization The Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Chicago: A Complicated Story of the Search for Lithuanian Identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1