Evaluation of metabolic factors affecting the presence of hepatosteatosis and the effect of insulin like growth factor-1 level in overweight and obese children

S. Koca, A. Bukulmez
{"title":"Evaluation of metabolic factors affecting the presence of hepatosteatosis and the effect of insulin like growth factor-1 level in overweight and obese children","authors":"S. Koca, A. Bukulmez","doi":"10.26900/hsq.1.3.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although previous studies related to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in childhood were predominantly ALT and uric acid level, the number of studies that have been handled in terms of insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level or IGF-1 standard deviation score (SDS) is limited. In this study, all factors that may affect NAFLD, including IGF-1 level and IGF-1 SDS, were evaluated in two groups of children who were not statistically different from each other in terms of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index and puberty. This study was a cross sectional study. 36 children with evidence of fatty liver disease on ultrasound imaging and 38 children without it were included in the study. Anthropometric data, laboratory measurements and radiological results of all participants were evaluated. All factors that could affect NAFLD were evaluated by binary logistic regression analysis. Weight, weight SDS, body mass index (BMI) SDS, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), AST, ALT, GGT, uric acid, triglyceride, HDLcholesterol, IGF-1, IGF-1 SDS were evaluated in this model to predict NAFLD. In the statistical model, the percentage of predicting those with NAFLD, that is, the sensitivity, was 88.9%, while the detection rate of those without NAFLD, that is, the specificity, was 94.7%. IGF-1 level was found to be significantly lower in the group with NAFLD (p: 0.04), but there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of IGF-1 SDS (p: 0.10). There are conflicting results in studies examining the relationship between IGF-1 SDS and NAFLD. This may be due to ethnicity, regional differences, kit-specific laboratory reference ranges, or method of measurement. Laboratory measurements including appropriate parameters with a detailed physical examination can be used to predict the presence of NAFLD without the need for radiological examination.","PeriodicalId":23539,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1, Issue 3","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1, Issue 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.1.3.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although previous studies related to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in childhood were predominantly ALT and uric acid level, the number of studies that have been handled in terms of insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level or IGF-1 standard deviation score (SDS) is limited. In this study, all factors that may affect NAFLD, including IGF-1 level and IGF-1 SDS, were evaluated in two groups of children who were not statistically different from each other in terms of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index and puberty. This study was a cross sectional study. 36 children with evidence of fatty liver disease on ultrasound imaging and 38 children without it were included in the study. Anthropometric data, laboratory measurements and radiological results of all participants were evaluated. All factors that could affect NAFLD were evaluated by binary logistic regression analysis. Weight, weight SDS, body mass index (BMI) SDS, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), AST, ALT, GGT, uric acid, triglyceride, HDLcholesterol, IGF-1, IGF-1 SDS were evaluated in this model to predict NAFLD. In the statistical model, the percentage of predicting those with NAFLD, that is, the sensitivity, was 88.9%, while the detection rate of those without NAFLD, that is, the specificity, was 94.7%. IGF-1 level was found to be significantly lower in the group with NAFLD (p: 0.04), but there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of IGF-1 SDS (p: 0.10). There are conflicting results in studies examining the relationship between IGF-1 SDS and NAFLD. This may be due to ethnicity, regional differences, kit-specific laboratory reference ranges, or method of measurement. Laboratory measurements including appropriate parameters with a detailed physical examination can be used to predict the presence of NAFLD without the need for radiological examination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超重和肥胖儿童中影响肝纤维化存在的代谢因素及胰岛素样生长因子-1水平的影响
虽然以往与儿童非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)相关的研究主要是ALT和尿酸水平,但针对胰岛素样生长因子-1 (IGF-1)水平或IGF-1标准偏差评分(SDS)进行的研究数量有限。本研究对两组年龄、性别、体重、身高、体质指数、青春期均无统计学差异的儿童进行IGF-1水平、IGF-1 SDS等所有可能影响NAFLD的因素的评估。这项研究是一项横断面研究。36名在超声成像上有脂肪肝证据的儿童和38名没有脂肪肝证据的儿童被纳入研究。对所有参与者的人体测量数据、实验室测量和放射学结果进行评估。对所有可能影响NAFLD的因素进行二元logistic回归分析。在该模型中评估体重、体重SDS、体重指数(BMI) SDS、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、AST、ALT、GGT、尿酸、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、IGF-1、IGF-1 SDS以预测NAFLD。在统计模型中,预测NAFLD患者的百分比,即敏感性为88.9%,而非NAFLD患者的检出率,即特异性为94.7%。NAFLD组IGF-1水平显著降低(p: 0.04),但各组间IGF-1 SDS无显著差异(p: 0.10)。关于IGF-1 SDS与NAFLD之间关系的研究结果相互矛盾。这可能是由于种族、地区差异、试剂盒特定的实验室参考范围或测量方法。实验室测量包括适当的参数和详细的体格检查可用于预测NAFLD的存在,而无需放射检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Stability of 1-Methylcyclopropene and Methylenecyclopropane Tautomers: Ab initio and DFT Study Variation of Flux Reflected in Solar Parabolic trough Collectors with Rim Angle Kinetics of Natural Kaolinite as a Catalyst for Toluene Dry Reforming Analysis of the Effect of Piping Geometrical Shape on Major Head Losses in Pipes Mubarak Ali's Contributions in Historiography Trends in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1