Combustion Turbine Exhaust Duct, Silencer, and Stack Scale Modeling

R. Craven, Keith Kirkpatrick, S. Idem
{"title":"Combustion Turbine Exhaust Duct, Silencer, and Stack Scale Modeling","authors":"R. Craven, Keith Kirkpatrick, S. Idem","doi":"10.1115/power2021-64118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After constructing a scale model of planned changes to a power plant exhaust system, tests were performed to measure pressure losses in the transition, silencer, and stack. A dimension of 0.30 m (1.0 ft) for the scale model corresponded to 3.7 m (12.0 ft) at full scale. To the extent possible, the scale model tests exhibited geometric similarity with the actual power plant. Total pressure loss coefficients varied between 2.122, 1.969, and 1.932, for three separate scale model configurations that were considered. A combination of turning vanes and splitter vanes in the five-gore elbow, coupled with the use of turning vanes in the rectangular elbow yielded the lowest total pressure loss. Although Reynolds number similarity between the scale model experiments and the actual power plant was not attained, Reynolds number independence was achieved in the tests. The results from this study was applied to model pressure loss in the actual power plant. The scale model testing revealed that utilization of the exhaust ducting design designated as Case A would yield a sufficiently low pressure loss that it would not degrade the performance of the combustion turbine in the power plant to be repaired. Therefore it was selected for inclusion in the retro-fitting of the power plant to facilitate its being quickly brought back on-line.","PeriodicalId":8567,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2021 Power Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2021 Power Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/power2021-64118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After constructing a scale model of planned changes to a power plant exhaust system, tests were performed to measure pressure losses in the transition, silencer, and stack. A dimension of 0.30 m (1.0 ft) for the scale model corresponded to 3.7 m (12.0 ft) at full scale. To the extent possible, the scale model tests exhibited geometric similarity with the actual power plant. Total pressure loss coefficients varied between 2.122, 1.969, and 1.932, for three separate scale model configurations that were considered. A combination of turning vanes and splitter vanes in the five-gore elbow, coupled with the use of turning vanes in the rectangular elbow yielded the lowest total pressure loss. Although Reynolds number similarity between the scale model experiments and the actual power plant was not attained, Reynolds number independence was achieved in the tests. The results from this study was applied to model pressure loss in the actual power plant. The scale model testing revealed that utilization of the exhaust ducting design designated as Case A would yield a sufficiently low pressure loss that it would not degrade the performance of the combustion turbine in the power plant to be repaired. Therefore it was selected for inclusion in the retro-fitting of the power plant to facilitate its being quickly brought back on-line.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
燃烧涡轮排气管道,消音器,和堆栈规模建模
在构建电厂排气系统计划变更的比例模型后,进行了测试,以测量过渡、消声器和烟囱中的压力损失。尺寸为0.30米(1.0英尺)的模型对应于3.7米(12.0英尺)的全比例尺。在可能的范围内,比例模型试验显示出与实际电厂的几何相似性。考虑的三种不同比例模型配置的总压损失系数在2.122、1.969和1.932之间变化。旋转叶片和分流叶片在五弯头的组合,再加上旋转叶片在矩形弯头的使用产生最低的总压力损失。虽然比例模型实验与实际电厂的雷诺数没有达到相似,但在试验中实现了雷诺数独立。将研究结果应用于实际电厂的压力损失模型。比例模型试验表明,使用案例A的排气管道设计将产生足够低的压力损失,从而不会降低待维修发电厂燃烧涡轮的性能。因此,它被选为包括在改造装置的发电厂,以促进其迅速恢复上线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Inverse Method for Parameter Retrieval in Solar Thermal Collector With a Single Glass Cover Experimental Evaluation of Dewar Volume and Cryocooler Cold Finger Size in a Small-Scale Stirling Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) System Design Considerations of Solar-Driven Hydrogen Production Plants for Residential Applications Combined Cycle Gas Turbines With Electrically-Heated Thermal Energy Storage for Dispatchable Zero-Carbon Electricity Investigation of the Performance of Air-Steam Combined Cycle for Electric Power Plants Using Low Grade Solid Fuels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1