{"title":"Analysis of FDA Warning Letters Issued to Indian Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Companies: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Shray Bablani, Manthan D Janodia","doi":"10.1177/2168479019879380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>FDA issues warning letters to pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, or clinical investigators if it observes serious violations of federal regulations. These warning letters contain the details about the nature of the violations observed and the corrective actions recommended by the FDA. A follow-up inspection may be requested by the recipient after taking the corrective actions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of warning letters issued to Indian pharmaceutical companies from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2018, was carried out. The warning letters were extracted from FDA's public database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 14-year study period, the number of warning letters issued to Indian pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers has gradually increased. Of all the violations listed in these warning letters, 85.87% were related to the failure of compliance with the cGMP guidelines. Moreover, 80.72% of these warning letters were not followed by a close-out warning, which indicated that the violations listed in these warning letters could not be resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the inability of the recipients to comply with the cGMP guidelines formed the majority of the violations observed in the warning letters, more resources and manpower have to be assigned to the manufacturing process of the pharmaceutical products.</p>","PeriodicalId":51928,"journal":{"name":"Historiographia Linguistica","volume":"34 1","pages":"2168479019879380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historiographia Linguistica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479019879380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: FDA issues warning letters to pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, or clinical investigators if it observes serious violations of federal regulations. These warning letters contain the details about the nature of the violations observed and the corrective actions recommended by the FDA. A follow-up inspection may be requested by the recipient after taking the corrective actions.
Methods: Analysis of warning letters issued to Indian pharmaceutical companies from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2018, was carried out. The warning letters were extracted from FDA's public database.
Results: Across the 14-year study period, the number of warning letters issued to Indian pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers has gradually increased. Of all the violations listed in these warning letters, 85.87% were related to the failure of compliance with the cGMP guidelines. Moreover, 80.72% of these warning letters were not followed by a close-out warning, which indicated that the violations listed in these warning letters could not be resolved.
Conclusion: As the inability of the recipients to comply with the cGMP guidelines formed the majority of the violations observed in the warning letters, more resources and manpower have to be assigned to the manufacturing process of the pharmaceutical products.
期刊介绍:
Historiographia Linguistica (HL) serves the ever growing community of scholars interested in the history of the sciences concerned with language such as linguistics, philology, anthropology, sociology, pedagogy, psychology, neurology, and other disciplines. Central objectives of HL are the critical presentation of the origin and development of particular ideas, concepts, methods, schools of thought or trends, and the discussion of the methodological and philosophical foundations of a historiography of the language sciences, including its relationship with the history and philosophy of science. HL is published in 3 issues per year of about 450 pages altogether.