Resilient Micropolitan Areas in the Face of Econ. Shocks:Stakeholder Collective Capacity Perspective

C. Poleacovschi, Arielle True-Funk, M. Haddad, David Peters
{"title":"Resilient Micropolitan Areas in the Face of Econ. Shocks:Stakeholder Collective Capacity Perspective","authors":"C. Poleacovschi, Arielle True-Funk, M. Haddad, David Peters","doi":"10.25219/EPOJ.2021.00103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micropolitan areas (between 10,000 and 50,000 people) are not immune to economic shocks that threaten their vitality. Factors related to economic shocks can range from local companies leaving a town or national economic crises affecting local economies. Using the perspective of local micropolitan area stakeholders, this research seeks to identify why certain micropolitan areas recover from an economic shock while others do not. The research included the case study of two micropolitan areas in the U.S.\nMidwest (one resilient and one vulnerable), based on 22 interviews with key stakeholders representing diverse for-profit and government organizations. Our results reveal differences in the collective capacity and its underlying practices in the two micropolitan areas. We found that stakeholders built collective capacity by aligning effort, interacting face-to-face, supporting participation, sharing identity and building organizational capacity. Collective capacity ultimately enhanced the resilient micropolitan area’s ability to\nadopt place-based, or localized, strategies at a higher rate and larger scale than the vulnerable micropolitan area. The results contribute to theory of constitutive collaboration and help policy makers and stakeholders make informed decisions regarding practices to promote economic resilience.","PeriodicalId":12443,"journal":{"name":"Francosphères: Volume 10, Issue 2","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Francosphères: Volume 10, Issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25219/EPOJ.2021.00103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Micropolitan areas (between 10,000 and 50,000 people) are not immune to economic shocks that threaten their vitality. Factors related to economic shocks can range from local companies leaving a town or national economic crises affecting local economies. Using the perspective of local micropolitan area stakeholders, this research seeks to identify why certain micropolitan areas recover from an economic shock while others do not. The research included the case study of two micropolitan areas in the U.S. Midwest (one resilient and one vulnerable), based on 22 interviews with key stakeholders representing diverse for-profit and government organizations. Our results reveal differences in the collective capacity and its underlying practices in the two micropolitan areas. We found that stakeholders built collective capacity by aligning effort, interacting face-to-face, supporting participation, sharing identity and building organizational capacity. Collective capacity ultimately enhanced the resilient micropolitan area’s ability to adopt place-based, or localized, strategies at a higher rate and larger scale than the vulnerable micropolitan area. The results contribute to theory of constitutive collaboration and help policy makers and stakeholders make informed decisions regarding practices to promote economic resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对经济的弹性小城市地区。冲击:利益相关者集体能力视角
小城市地区(人口在1万至5万人之间)也不能幸免于威胁其活力的经济冲击。与经济冲击相关的因素包括当地公司离开城镇或影响当地经济的国家经济危机。本研究利用当地小城市利益相关者的视角,试图确定为什么某些小城市地区从经济冲击中恢复过来,而另一些却没有。该研究包括对美国中西部两个小城市地区(一个有弹性,一个脆弱)的案例研究,基于对代表不同营利和政府组织的主要利益相关者的22次访谈。我们的研究结果揭示了两个小城市地区在集体能力及其基本实践方面的差异。我们发现利益相关者通过协调努力、面对面互动、支持参与、分享身份和建立组织能力来建立集体能力。集体能力最终增强了弹性小城市地区采用基于地点或本地化策略的能力,比脆弱的小城市地区采用策略的速度更快,规模更大。研究结果有助于构建本构合作理论,并有助于政策制定者和利益相关者就促进经济弹性的实践做出明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Color and Architecture: Walter Gropius and the Bauhaus Wall-Painting Workshop in Collaboration, 1922-1926 Experiments with Megastuctures and Building Systems. University Building in the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1960s and 1970s From IB74 to US Patent 4438616: The (re)making of a profession The constraints of translating martial arts fiction Translating and publishing French theatre in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1