The Effect of Ownership Structure on the Value of a Private Company

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Review of Law & Economics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1515/rle-2022-0030
Johan Van den Cruijce, Gamble Baffert II, Nicolas Janssens de Bisthoven, J. Tistaert
{"title":"The Effect of Ownership Structure on the Value of a Private Company","authors":"Johan Van den Cruijce, Gamble Baffert II, Nicolas Janssens de Bisthoven, J. Tistaert","doi":"10.1515/rle-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The value of an unlisted company is a contentious issue. This is because investors value marketability and liquidity, but vacillate on the appropriate percentage discount that needs to be applied for the valuation of a private company. As more companies find it easier to remain private, a better understanding of this discount is increasingly important. The extant discount studies are mainly derived from financial and transactional data. They provide reliable averages using large sample sizes, but present few determinants to explain the wide ranges in the observations. Our research is based on a unique, alternative data source that complements existing studies by tapping into rich contextual information. Specifically, we examine court decisions that determine the appropriate discount and relate this percentage to an important characteristic of a private company: its “open” character, i.e. its willingness to accept outside shareholders or partners in the venture. We find that open and closed companies differ in value 6.5%. Our conclusions hold after controlling for known determinants of the discount. Our results impact valuation approaches and present real-world application for the owners and managers of private companies who may consider opening ownership to third parties.","PeriodicalId":44795,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The value of an unlisted company is a contentious issue. This is because investors value marketability and liquidity, but vacillate on the appropriate percentage discount that needs to be applied for the valuation of a private company. As more companies find it easier to remain private, a better understanding of this discount is increasingly important. The extant discount studies are mainly derived from financial and transactional data. They provide reliable averages using large sample sizes, but present few determinants to explain the wide ranges in the observations. Our research is based on a unique, alternative data source that complements existing studies by tapping into rich contextual information. Specifically, we examine court decisions that determine the appropriate discount and relate this percentage to an important characteristic of a private company: its “open” character, i.e. its willingness to accept outside shareholders or partners in the venture. We find that open and closed companies differ in value 6.5%. Our conclusions hold after controlling for known determinants of the discount. Our results impact valuation approaches and present real-world application for the owners and managers of private companies who may consider opening ownership to third parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股权结构对民营公司价值的影响
摘要非上市公司的价值是一个有争议的问题。这是因为投资者看重的是可市场性和流动性,但对于私营公司估值所需的适当折价比例却摇摆不定。随着越来越多的公司发现保持私有化更容易,更好地理解这种折扣变得越来越重要。现有的贴现研究主要来源于财务和交易数据。它们使用大样本量提供了可靠的平均值,但几乎没有决定因素来解释观察结果的大范围。我们的研究基于一个独特的、可替代的数据源,通过挖掘丰富的上下文信息来补充现有的研究。具体地说,我们审查法院决定适当的折扣,并将这个百分比与私营公司的一个重要特征联系起来:它的“开放”特征,即它愿意接受外部股东或合资伙伴。我们发现开放公司和封闭公司的价值相差6.5%。在控制了已知的折扣决定因素后,我们的结论成立。我们的研究结果影响了估值方法,并为可能考虑向第三方开放所有权的私营公司的所有者和经理提供了现实世界的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The Disavowal of Decisionism: Politically Motivated Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals On the Role of Sales Taxes for Efficient Compensation of Property Loss Under Strict Liability Broadband Internet and Crime Unraveling the Peltzman Effect: The Significance of Agent’s Type Do US State Breach Notification Laws Decrease Firm Data Breaches?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1