Optimal development of location and technology independent machine learning photovoltaic performance predictive models

Andreas Livera, M. Theristis, G. Makrides, S. Ransome, J. Sutterlueti, G. Georghiou
{"title":"Optimal development of location and technology independent machine learning photovoltaic performance predictive models","authors":"Andreas Livera, M. Theristis, G. Makrides, S. Ransome, J. Sutterlueti, G. Georghiou","doi":"10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photovoltaic (PV) power prediction is important for monitoring the performance of PV plants. The scope of this work is to develop a methodology for deriving an optimized location and technology independent machine learning (ML) model for power prediction. The prediction accuracy results demonstrated that the performance of the ML model was primarily affected by the dataset split method. In particular, for a 70:30 % train and test set approach, the ML model achieved a normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) of 0.88 % when using randomly selected samples compared to 0.94 % when using continuous samples. The accuracy of the developed model was also affected by the duration of the train set. For a random 70:30 % train and test set approach, the constructed ML topology achieved a nRMSE of 0.88 %, while when the dataset was split into a 30:30 % portion, the nRMSE was 0.95 %. Moreover, when low irradiance conditions were filtered out and 70 % of the entire dataset was randomly chosen for model training, a nRMSE of 1.41 % was obtained demonstrating that the model’s accuracy was not improved. Finally, for a random 10:30 % train and test set approach, the FNNN achieved the lowest nRMSE of 1.10 % when the model was trained using the prevailing irradiance classes.","PeriodicalId":6749,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"1270-1275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) power prediction is important for monitoring the performance of PV plants. The scope of this work is to develop a methodology for deriving an optimized location and technology independent machine learning (ML) model for power prediction. The prediction accuracy results demonstrated that the performance of the ML model was primarily affected by the dataset split method. In particular, for a 70:30 % train and test set approach, the ML model achieved a normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) of 0.88 % when using randomly selected samples compared to 0.94 % when using continuous samples. The accuracy of the developed model was also affected by the duration of the train set. For a random 70:30 % train and test set approach, the constructed ML topology achieved a nRMSE of 0.88 %, while when the dataset was split into a 30:30 % portion, the nRMSE was 0.95 %. Moreover, when low irradiance conditions were filtered out and 70 % of the entire dataset was randomly chosen for model training, a nRMSE of 1.41 % was obtained demonstrating that the model’s accuracy was not improved. Finally, for a random 10:30 % train and test set approach, the FNNN achieved the lowest nRMSE of 1.10 % when the model was trained using the prevailing irradiance classes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
位置与技术无关的光伏性能预测模型的优化开发
光伏发电功率预测对光伏电站性能监测具有重要意义。这项工作的范围是开发一种方法,用于导出用于功率预测的优化位置和技术独立的机器学习(ML)模型。预测精度结果表明,数据集分割方法主要影响机器学习模型的性能。特别是,对于70:30%的训练和测试集方法,ML模型在使用随机选择的样本时实现了0.88%的归一化均方根误差(nRMSE),而使用连续样本时为0.94%。建立的模型的准确性也受到列车集持续时间的影响。对于随机的70:30%的训练和测试集方法,构建的ML拓扑实现了0.88%的nRMSE,而当数据集被分成30:30%的部分时,nRMSE为0.95%。此外,当过滤掉低辐照度条件并随机选择整个数据集的70%进行模型训练时,得到的nRMSE为1.41%,表明模型的精度没有提高。最后,对于随机的10:30 %训练集和测试集方法,当使用流行的辐照度类别训练模型时,FNNN的nRMSE最低,为1.10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High efficiency 6-junction solar cells for the global and direct spectra Unintentional Islanding Evaluation Utilizing Discrete RLC Circuit Versus Power Hardware-in-the Loop Method Effects of increasing PV deployment on US Regional Transmission Organizations Analysis of Cu(In,Ga) Se grading evolution during low deposition temperature co-evaporation process by GD-OES and XPS measurements. Impact on solar cell performances and modelling Flexible operation of photovoltaic electrodialysis (PV-ED) low-cost community-scale desalination systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1