Role of GALAD serological model in the clinical diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma

Q4 Health Professions 中华检验医学杂志 Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2019.12.012
Lin Tong, Zhiyuan Gao, Chenjun Huang, Huijuan Feng, Sun Xiaojuan, Jun Ji, Xiao Xiao, Fang Meng
{"title":"Role of GALAD serological model in the clinical diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Lin Tong, Zhiyuan Gao, Chenjun Huang, Huijuan Feng, Sun Xiaojuan, Jun Ji, Xiao Xiao, Fang Meng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2019.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the value of GALAD model, including gender, age, AFP, AFP-L3 and DCP in diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI). \n \n \nMethods \nUsing retrospective study method, 5 919 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received radical operation from January 2015 to December 2018 in Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were enrolled into study group. At the same time, 1 745 patients with benign liver diseases (BLDs) were enrolled into control group. The concentration of DCP was detected by Lumipulse G1200 automatic immune analyzer, and the concentration of AFP was detected by Cobas e601 automatic immune analyzer. AFP-L3 was detected by affinity adsorption centrifugation. The non-parametric Mann Whitney test was used to compare the difference between two groups. The chi square test was used to compare the rates. The diagnostic value of single serological marker and GALAD model for primary hepatocellular carcinoma was analyzed. The predictive effect of GALAD model on MVI of primary hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated. \n \n \nResults \nCompared with single serum marker, the diagnostic value of GALAD model is higher. When the cutoff value is -0.33, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy reach to 91.9% (5 440/5 919), 86.8% (1 515/1 745) and 90.7% (6 955/7 664), respectively. The area under the curve can reach 0.960 [95%CI (0.955-0.964)]. Compared with no MVI (MO) group, the value of GALAD model in MVI low-risk group (M1), MVI high-risk group (M2) and MVI (M1+2) were significantly higher (Z values were-12.517, -22.883, -21.655, P<0.05), Galad model predicts MVI (M2) in high risk group,AUC was 0.717 [95%CI (0.701-0.733)] (M0 ratio M2). \n \n \nConclusion \nGALAD model has better diagnostic performance in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and has certain predictive value for microvascular invasion. \n \n \nKey words: \nCarcinoma, hepatocellular; Liver neoplasms; Neoplasm invasiveness; Microvessels; alpha-Fetoproteins; Prothrombin","PeriodicalId":10096,"journal":{"name":"中华检验医学杂志","volume":"94 1","pages":"1037-1041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华检验医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2019.12.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of GALAD model, including gender, age, AFP, AFP-L3 and DCP in diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI). Methods Using retrospective study method, 5 919 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received radical operation from January 2015 to December 2018 in Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were enrolled into study group. At the same time, 1 745 patients with benign liver diseases (BLDs) were enrolled into control group. The concentration of DCP was detected by Lumipulse G1200 automatic immune analyzer, and the concentration of AFP was detected by Cobas e601 automatic immune analyzer. AFP-L3 was detected by affinity adsorption centrifugation. The non-parametric Mann Whitney test was used to compare the difference between two groups. The chi square test was used to compare the rates. The diagnostic value of single serological marker and GALAD model for primary hepatocellular carcinoma was analyzed. The predictive effect of GALAD model on MVI of primary hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated. Results Compared with single serum marker, the diagnostic value of GALAD model is higher. When the cutoff value is -0.33, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy reach to 91.9% (5 440/5 919), 86.8% (1 515/1 745) and 90.7% (6 955/7 664), respectively. The area under the curve can reach 0.960 [95%CI (0.955-0.964)]. Compared with no MVI (MO) group, the value of GALAD model in MVI low-risk group (M1), MVI high-risk group (M2) and MVI (M1+2) were significantly higher (Z values were-12.517, -22.883, -21.655, P<0.05), Galad model predicts MVI (M2) in high risk group,AUC was 0.717 [95%CI (0.701-0.733)] (M0 ratio M2). Conclusion GALAD model has better diagnostic performance in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and has certain predictive value for microvascular invasion. Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular; Liver neoplasms; Neoplasm invasiveness; Microvessels; alpha-Fetoproteins; Prothrombin
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GALAD血清学模型在原发性肝细胞癌临床诊断中的作用
目的探讨包括性别、年龄、AFP、AFP- l3、DCP在内的GALAD模型在原发性肝癌诊断及微血管侵袭(MVI)预测中的价值。方法采用回顾性研究方法,将2015年1月至2018年12月在东方肝胆外科医院行根治性手术的原发性肝癌(HCC)患者5919例纳入研究组。同时选取良性肝脏疾病(BLDs)患者1 745例作为对照组。采用Lumipulse G1200自动免疫分析仪检测DCP浓度,采用Cobas e601自动免疫分析仪检测AFP浓度。亲和吸附离心法检测AFP-L3。采用非参数Mann Whitney检验比较两组间的差异。卡方检验用于比较比率。分析单一血清学标志物及GALAD模型对原发性肝癌的诊断价值。评价GALAD模型对原发性肝癌MVI的预测作用。结果与单一血清标志物相比,GALAD模型的诊断价值更高。截止值为-0.33时,诊断敏感性为91.9%(5 440/5 919),特异性为86.8%(1 515/1 745),准确性为90.7%(6 955/7 664)。曲线下面积可达0.960 [95%CI(0.955 ~ 0.964)]。与无MVI (MO)组相比,MVI低危组(M1)、MVI高危组(M2)和MVI (M1+2)的GALAD模型值均显著升高(Z值分别为12.517、-22.883、-21.655,P<0.05), GALAD模型预测MVI (M2)在高危组,AUC为0.717 [95%CI (0.701 ~ 0.733)] (M0比值M2)。结论GALAD模型对原发性肝细胞癌有较好的诊断价值,对微血管侵袭有一定的预测价值。关键词:肝癌;肝细胞癌;肝肿瘤;肿瘤侵袭性;微血管;甲胎蛋白;凝血酶原
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华检验医学杂志
中华检验医学杂志 Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8037
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Clinical evaluation of four different detection reagents for 2019-nCoV IgM and IgG antibodies in patients with COVID-19 and suspected cases Potential value of extracellular vesicles/exosomes in diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 Chinese expert consensus on the rapid nucleic acid testing of 2019-nCoV COVID-19: immune response and its implications for disease monitoring and therapy Performance evaluation of six coronavirus nucleic acid detection reagents and matching analysis with nucleic acid extraction reagents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1