EXPRESS: Responsible Research in Business and Management (RRBM) and the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing: Connected through Impact

IF 5.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Public Policy & Marketing Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI:10.1177/07439156211056538
Samantha N. N. Cross, A. Gustafsson, C. Pechmann, Karen Page Winterich
{"title":"EXPRESS: Responsible Research in Business and Management (RRBM) and the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing: Connected through Impact","authors":"Samantha N. N. Cross, A. Gustafsson, C. Pechmann, Karen Page Winterich","doi":"10.1177/07439156211056538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For 40 years, the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) has provided a forum within the marketing discipline for scholarship on the impact of public policies and actions on marketers, consumers, and society. It seeks articles that offer insightful and thoughtful analyses of public policies that affect the marketing profession and the marketplace. Martin and Scott’s (2021, p. 2) editorial stresses the opportunity for JPP&M to be the journal for topics that “make a difference,” defined as “something that helps people or makes the world a better place.” This positioning situates JPP&M as an excellent outlet for articles that reflect the principles espoused by the growing emphasis in marketing academia on Responsible Research in Business and Marketing (RRBM). The seven RRBM principles are unapologetically ambitious, asking for both basic and applied contributions with sound methodologies that value multidisciplinary collaboration, stakeholder involvement, impact on numerous stakeholders, and broad dissemination (RRBM 2021). These principles overlap and intersect with the goals of JPP&M and challenge marketing researchers, educators, and practitioners to think boldly, broadly, and globally with a shared vision of inspiring, encouraging, and supporting credible, useful, and inclusive research. Together, JPP&M and RRBM seek research that can make a positive difference for consumers and stakeholders and pave the way, one article at a time, for societal well-being and a better world. Making a positive difference implies a shift to a dual focus in which corporate and marketing strategies need to consider corporate and shareholder well-being, as well as consumer, environmental, and societal impact, for the benefit of both companies and the world at large (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2013). The Transformative Consumer Research movement has embraced this focus, envisioning “Marketing as a Force for Good” (Mende and Scott 2021). Our hope is for RRBM principles to be applied more broadly beyond the TCR community to researchers in consumer behavior as well as marketing strategy. Businesses can no longer focus solely on shareholder value and profitability given the increasing consumer demand for socially responsible practices concerning employee welfare, equality, environmental impact, and community contributions. Marketing researchers must broaden their perspective to consider marketing‘s impacts on a variety of stakeholders and societal well-being. Although several marketing journals have had special issues on topics related to RRBM (e.g., Journal of Marketing’s Better Marketing for a Better World, Journal of Consumer Psychology’s Consumer Psychology for the Greater Good, Journal of Marketing Research’s Mitigation in Marketing), JPP&M has consistently published articles that embody the principles of RRBM. As such, it is not surprising that five of the articles recognized by the AMA-EBSCO-RRBMAnnual Award for Responsible Research in Marketing in its inaugural year (2019) were published in JPP&M, with two additional JPP&M articles receiving this award in 2020. Although each award-winning JPP&M article fulfills several of the RRBM principles, we highlight one principle per article in this commentary. In the inaugural year of the award, the JPP&M article by Catlin, Pechmann, and Brass (2015) was one of only two distinguished winners, and it demonstrates commitment to RRBM Principle 1: benefit both consumer welfare and business. Guided by theory on naive consumer beliefs, the researchers","PeriodicalId":51437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156211056538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

For 40 years, the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) has provided a forum within the marketing discipline for scholarship on the impact of public policies and actions on marketers, consumers, and society. It seeks articles that offer insightful and thoughtful analyses of public policies that affect the marketing profession and the marketplace. Martin and Scott’s (2021, p. 2) editorial stresses the opportunity for JPP&M to be the journal for topics that “make a difference,” defined as “something that helps people or makes the world a better place.” This positioning situates JPP&M as an excellent outlet for articles that reflect the principles espoused by the growing emphasis in marketing academia on Responsible Research in Business and Marketing (RRBM). The seven RRBM principles are unapologetically ambitious, asking for both basic and applied contributions with sound methodologies that value multidisciplinary collaboration, stakeholder involvement, impact on numerous stakeholders, and broad dissemination (RRBM 2021). These principles overlap and intersect with the goals of JPP&M and challenge marketing researchers, educators, and practitioners to think boldly, broadly, and globally with a shared vision of inspiring, encouraging, and supporting credible, useful, and inclusive research. Together, JPP&M and RRBM seek research that can make a positive difference for consumers and stakeholders and pave the way, one article at a time, for societal well-being and a better world. Making a positive difference implies a shift to a dual focus in which corporate and marketing strategies need to consider corporate and shareholder well-being, as well as consumer, environmental, and societal impact, for the benefit of both companies and the world at large (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2013). The Transformative Consumer Research movement has embraced this focus, envisioning “Marketing as a Force for Good” (Mende and Scott 2021). Our hope is for RRBM principles to be applied more broadly beyond the TCR community to researchers in consumer behavior as well as marketing strategy. Businesses can no longer focus solely on shareholder value and profitability given the increasing consumer demand for socially responsible practices concerning employee welfare, equality, environmental impact, and community contributions. Marketing researchers must broaden their perspective to consider marketing‘s impacts on a variety of stakeholders and societal well-being. Although several marketing journals have had special issues on topics related to RRBM (e.g., Journal of Marketing’s Better Marketing for a Better World, Journal of Consumer Psychology’s Consumer Psychology for the Greater Good, Journal of Marketing Research’s Mitigation in Marketing), JPP&M has consistently published articles that embody the principles of RRBM. As such, it is not surprising that five of the articles recognized by the AMA-EBSCO-RRBMAnnual Award for Responsible Research in Marketing in its inaugural year (2019) were published in JPP&M, with two additional JPP&M articles receiving this award in 2020. Although each award-winning JPP&M article fulfills several of the RRBM principles, we highlight one principle per article in this commentary. In the inaugural year of the award, the JPP&M article by Catlin, Pechmann, and Brass (2015) was one of only two distinguished winners, and it demonstrates commitment to RRBM Principle 1: benefit both consumer welfare and business. Guided by theory on naive consumer beliefs, the researchers
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS:负责任的商业与管理研究(RRBM)和公共政策与营销杂志:通过影响联系起来
40年来,《公共政策与市场营销杂志》(JPP&M)为市场营销领域的学术研究提供了一个论坛,探讨公共政策和行动对市场营销人员、消费者和社会的影响。它寻求对影响营销专业和市场的公共政策提供有见地和深思熟虑的分析的文章。马丁和斯科特(2021年,第2页)的社论强调JPP&M有机会成为“有所作为”主题的期刊,定义为“帮助人们或使世界变得更美好的东西”。这种定位使JPP&M成为一个优秀的文章出口,这些文章反映了市场营销学术界日益重视的商业和市场营销责任研究(RRBM)所支持的原则。七项RRBM原则雄心勃勃,要求在基础和应用方面做出贡献,并采用合理的方法,重视多学科合作、利益相关者参与、对众多利益相关者的影响和广泛传播(RRBM 2021)。这些原则与JPP&M的目标重叠和交叉,并要求营销研究人员、教育工作者和从业者大胆、广泛和全球地思考,以激励、鼓励和支持可信、有用和包容的研究的共同愿景。JPP&M和RRBM共同寻求能够为消费者和利益相关者带来积极影响的研究,并为社会福祉和更美好的世界铺平道路,一次一篇文章。做出积极的改变意味着转向双重关注,企业和营销策略需要考虑企业和股东的福祉,以及消费者、环境和社会影响,以造福企业和整个世界(经济合作与发展组织,2013年)。转型消费者研究运动已经接受了这一焦点,设想“营销作为一种好的力量”(Mende和Scott 2021)。我们希望RRBM的原则能够在TCR社区之外更广泛地应用于消费者行为和营销策略的研究人员。考虑到消费者对员工福利、平等、环境影响和社区贡献等社会责任行为的需求日益增加,企业不能再仅仅关注股东价值和盈利能力。营销研究人员必须拓宽他们的视野,以考虑营销对各种利益相关者和社会福祉的影响。虽然一些市场营销期刊有与RRBM相关的专题(例如,《市场营销杂志》的《更好的市场营销,更好的世界》,《消费者心理学杂志》的《消费者心理学为了更好的利益》,《市场营销研究杂志》的《缓解营销》),但JPP&M一直发表体现RRBM原则的文章。因此,在首届(2019年)获得ama - ebsco - rrb手册营销负责任研究奖的文章中,有五篇发表在JPP&M上也就不足为奇了,JPP&M的另外两篇文章在2020年获得了该奖项。尽管每篇获奖的JPP&M文章都实现了几个RRBM原则,但我们在这篇评论中强调了每篇文章的一个原则。在该奖项的第一年,由Catlin, Pechmann和Brass(2015)撰写的JPP&M文章是仅有的两个杰出获奖者之一,它表明了对RRBM原则1的承诺:既有利于消费者福利,也有利于企业。在幼稚消费者信念理论的指导下,研究人员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing welcomes manuscripts from diverse disciplines to offer a range of perspectives. We encourage submissions from individuals with varied backgrounds, such as marketing, communications, economics, consumer affairs, law, public policy, sociology, psychology, anthropology, or philosophy. The journal prioritizes well-documented, well-reasoned, balanced, and relevant manuscripts, regardless of the author's field of expertise.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Cultivating Sustainable Return Migration to Lebanon: Supporting Young Migrants through Marketing Systems Amidst Ongoing Conflict EXPRESS: Resourcing Hope: Refugee Agentive Consumption Acts in Protracted Displacement EXPRESS: Response Satisficing across Online Data Sources: Effects of Satisficing on Data Quality and Policy-Relevant Results Social Impact at Scale: Reflections on the Recommendations of the TCR Impact Task Force Commentary on “Transitioning to New Paradigms for Societally Impactful Research: Recommendations from the TCR Impact Task Force and an Agenda”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1