Influence of vegetable biostimulators on physical and chemical parameters of cows’ milk

Katerina Silchenko, T. Ryzhkova
{"title":"Influence of vegetable biostimulators on physical and chemical parameters of cows’ milk","authors":"Katerina Silchenko, T. Ryzhkova","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.3058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of a comparative study of the effectiveness of plant biostimulators “Biosvit” and “Megasvit” on changes in the physicochemical composition of milk, which was obtained from dairy cows of the Ukrainian black-and-white dairy breed, kept in Ltd “Renaissance +1881” Zolochivskyi district of Kharkiv region are reflected in the article.\nThere were used 2 biological batches in our studies. One batch of the biological product was made on the basis of a dry mixture, which is called ‘11-Tigers by “Eleven Tigers Herbal Bar Energizer” and consists of seven species of plants of foreign origin. The other type is based on a dry mixture of 7 plants of domestic origin.\nBiologicals “Biosvit” and “Megasvit” experimental groups of animals (D 1) and (D 2) were injected subcutaneously at the rate of 3-4 mg of active substance per 1 kg of the body weight (on average 15 ml) per 1 animal. Biologicals were injected to the above animals five times, every 72 hours. Milk samples, taken from the formed groups of cows, were monitored for physico-chemical parameters.\nIt was carried out that under the influence of two types of drugs “Biosvit” and “Megasvi” the productivity of cows in experimental groups increased, and in the milk samples from the cows in these groups (D 1) and (D 2), there was an increase in mass fraction: fat by 0,19 and 0,2%; protein by 0,15 and 0,16%; lactose by 0,13 and 0,14%; dry matter by 0,35 and 0,45%, skimmed milk powder by 0,15 and 0,19%, protein by 0,16 (P ≥ 0,95) and 0,28% respectively, compared with the control group of cows (K(controlled)). It can be noted that under the influence of the biological product “Megasvit” there was a more significant increase in the mass fraction of fat by 0,11%; protein by 0,25%, compared with similar indicators of the biological product “Biosvit”.\n\n","PeriodicalId":53138,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.3058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of a comparative study of the effectiveness of plant biostimulators “Biosvit” and “Megasvit” on changes in the physicochemical composition of milk, which was obtained from dairy cows of the Ukrainian black-and-white dairy breed, kept in Ltd “Renaissance +1881” Zolochivskyi district of Kharkiv region are reflected in the article. There were used 2 biological batches in our studies. One batch of the biological product was made on the basis of a dry mixture, which is called ‘11-Tigers by “Eleven Tigers Herbal Bar Energizer” and consists of seven species of plants of foreign origin. The other type is based on a dry mixture of 7 plants of domestic origin. Biologicals “Biosvit” and “Megasvit” experimental groups of animals (D 1) and (D 2) were injected subcutaneously at the rate of 3-4 mg of active substance per 1 kg of the body weight (on average 15 ml) per 1 animal. Biologicals were injected to the above animals five times, every 72 hours. Milk samples, taken from the formed groups of cows, were monitored for physico-chemical parameters. It was carried out that under the influence of two types of drugs “Biosvit” and “Megasvi” the productivity of cows in experimental groups increased, and in the milk samples from the cows in these groups (D 1) and (D 2), there was an increase in mass fraction: fat by 0,19 and 0,2%; protein by 0,15 and 0,16%; lactose by 0,13 and 0,14%; dry matter by 0,35 and 0,45%, skimmed milk powder by 0,15 and 0,19%, protein by 0,16 (P ≥ 0,95) and 0,28% respectively, compared with the control group of cows (K(controlled)). It can be noted that under the influence of the biological product “Megasvit” there was a more significant increase in the mass fraction of fat by 0,11%; protein by 0,25%, compared with similar indicators of the biological product “Biosvit”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物生物刺激剂对牛奶理化参数的影响
文章中反映了植物生物刺激剂“Biosvit”和“Megasvit”对牛奶理化成分变化的有效性的比较研究结果,该研究来自哈尔科夫地区Zolochivskyi地区“Renaissance +1881”有限公司饲养的乌克兰黑白奶牛品种。在我们的研究中使用了2个生物批次。其中一批生物制品是在一种干混合物的基础上制成的,这种混合物被“十一虎草药棒劲量”称为“11-老虎”,由七种外来植物组成。另一种类型是基于7种国内植物的干燥混合物。生物制剂“Biosvit”和“Megasvit”试验组动物(d1)和(d2)以每只动物每1公斤体重3-4 mg活性物质(平均15 ml)的速度皮下注射。每72小时给上述动物注射5次生物制剂。从形成的奶牛群中提取的牛奶样本进行了物理化学参数的监测。结果表明,在“Biosvit”和“Megasvi”两种药物的作用下,试验组奶牛的生产能力有所提高,在这两组奶牛(d1)和(d2)的牛奶样品中,质量分数:脂肪分别增加了0.19%和0.2%;蛋白质分别为0,15和0,16%;乳糖分别减少0.13和0.14%;干物质比对照组分别降低0.35%和0.45%,脱脂奶粉比对照组分别降低0.15%和0.19%,蛋白质比对照组分别降低0.16% (P≥0.95)和0.28% (K(对照))。可以注意到,在生物制品“Megasvit”的影响下,脂肪的质量分数增加了0.11%;与生物制品“Biosvit”的类似指标相比,蛋白质含量降低了0.25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The influence of age on the occurrence of internal parasites in perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) from Lake Góreckie in Wielkopolski National Park Effectiveness of the use of probiotics in the diet of broiler chickens The use of radiography for measurements of the medullary cavity in the metacarpal bone in the European roe deer Capreolus capreolus for assessment of ontogenetic quality – preliminary study Preliminary biometric characteristics of Border Collies and their dependence on sport activity The potential application of sheep wool as a component of composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1