{"title":"Signs of Trust in the Italian Renaissance","authors":"A. Rizzi","doi":"10.1086/705434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TRUST PLAYS A FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN HOW INDIVIDUALS , communities, and institutions interact. Crises of trust have always affected communities. Earlymodern Italy is no exception. Governments, communes, and duchies trusted condottieri and podestà among other professionals to protect them. Fede (faith, trust) was an essential social condition for trade. In 1732, Ergas and Silvera, two Sephardic traders based in Livorno, wrote to another Sephardic merchant in Venice that what mattered to them most was to be able to rely on a “trustworthy and diligent person” (persona de confianza y deligente). Ideally, fede or trust was also accompanied by fiducia—or expectation that contracts, agreements, and all manner of friendships would be honored. In turn, fiduciawas ideally sustained by trust and a series of more or less flexible forms of contract that would protect both individuals and property. Failure to demonstrate trustworthiness often resulted in loss of honor. This was the case in the fifteenth century for Lodovico and Gianfranco Strozzi, whose insolvency, in the words of their cousin Alessandra Strozzi, brought a stain on their lineage that “could last forever.” Scholarship has focused on early modern rituals of trust (oath, membership, handshake, or kiss), but we know less about how trustworthiness was signaled and received.","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/705434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
TRUST PLAYS A FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN HOW INDIVIDUALS , communities, and institutions interact. Crises of trust have always affected communities. Earlymodern Italy is no exception. Governments, communes, and duchies trusted condottieri and podestà among other professionals to protect them. Fede (faith, trust) was an essential social condition for trade. In 1732, Ergas and Silvera, two Sephardic traders based in Livorno, wrote to another Sephardic merchant in Venice that what mattered to them most was to be able to rely on a “trustworthy and diligent person” (persona de confianza y deligente). Ideally, fede or trust was also accompanied by fiducia—or expectation that contracts, agreements, and all manner of friendships would be honored. In turn, fiduciawas ideally sustained by trust and a series of more or less flexible forms of contract that would protect both individuals and property. Failure to demonstrate trustworthiness often resulted in loss of honor. This was the case in the fifteenth century for Lodovico and Gianfranco Strozzi, whose insolvency, in the words of their cousin Alessandra Strozzi, brought a stain on their lineage that “could last forever.” Scholarship has focused on early modern rituals of trust (oath, membership, handshake, or kiss), but we know less about how trustworthiness was signaled and received.
信任在个人、社区和机构的互动中起着重要作用。信任危机总是会影响社区。近代早期的意大利也不例外。各国政府、公社和公国都信任雇佣兵和警察以及其他专业人员来保护他们。Fede(信仰,信任)是贸易必不可少的社会条件。1732年,利沃诺的两名西班牙裔商人埃尔加斯(Ergas)和西尔维拉(Silvera)写信给威尼斯的另一名西班牙裔商人,说对他们来说最重要的是能够依靠一个“值得信赖和勤奋的人”(persona de confianza y deligente)。理想情况下,忠诚或信任也伴随着信任——或者期望契约、协议和所有形式的友谊都会得到尊重。反过来,信托理想地通过信任和一系列或多或少灵活的合同形式来维持,这些合同形式将保护个人和财产。不能表现出可信赖性往往会导致名誉的丧失。这就是15世纪洛多维科和詹弗兰科·斯特罗齐的情况,用他们的堂兄亚历山德拉·斯特罗齐的话来说,他们的破产给他们的血统带来了“可能永远”的污点。学者们关注的是早期现代的信任仪式(宣誓、入会、握手或亲吻),但我们对信任是如何发出信号和接受的知之甚少。