The discourse of the non-method

O. Roy
{"title":"The discourse of the non-method","authors":"O. Roy","doi":"10.1177/07591063231160231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proposes a reflection on the methodological dimensions of a research path initially devoted to the relationship between Islam and politics in Afghanistan, then in various regional contexts, and finally extended to the relationship between religion, politics and culture in the contemporary world. The author returns to his concrete, empirical and intuitive relationship with fieldwork, nourished by a culture of human and social sciences impregnated with anthropology and philosophy. The article first examines the modalities and limits of the interview and/or questionnaire survey based on the author’s seminal investigations in Afghanistan, arguing for a prolonged coexistence with the actors. It then examines the comparative and interpretive challenge that any change of case study represents for this immersive posture. The article then examines the methodological and ethical effects of surveys conducted in contexts of political violence. Finally, the relative value of quantitative and qualitative methods and the implications of this debate for the teaching of methods are discussed in light of research on religion.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231160231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article proposes a reflection on the methodological dimensions of a research path initially devoted to the relationship between Islam and politics in Afghanistan, then in various regional contexts, and finally extended to the relationship between religion, politics and culture in the contemporary world. The author returns to his concrete, empirical and intuitive relationship with fieldwork, nourished by a culture of human and social sciences impregnated with anthropology and philosophy. The article first examines the modalities and limits of the interview and/or questionnaire survey based on the author’s seminal investigations in Afghanistan, arguing for a prolonged coexistence with the actors. It then examines the comparative and interpretive challenge that any change of case study represents for this immersive posture. The article then examines the methodological and ethical effects of surveys conducted in contexts of political violence. Finally, the relative value of quantitative and qualitative methods and the implications of this debate for the teaching of methods are discussed in light of research on religion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非方法的话语
本文提出了对研究路径的方法论维度的反思,该研究路径最初致力于阿富汗的伊斯兰教与政治之间的关系,然后在各种区域背景下,最后扩展到当代世界的宗教、政治和文化之间的关系。作者回到了他与田野调查的具体、经验和直观的关系,这种关系受到了充满人类学和哲学的人文社会科学文化的滋养。本文首先根据作者在阿富汗的开创性调查考察了访谈和/或问卷调查的方式和局限性,主张与行动者长期共存。然后,它检查比较和解释的挑战,任何变化的案例研究代表这种身临其境的姿态。然后,文章探讨了在政治暴力背景下进行的调查的方法和伦理影响。最后,以宗教研究为背景,讨论了定量方法与定性方法的相对价值,以及这种争论对方法教学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Where it turns out that the method does not break the glass ceiling… Comment les citoyens et les citoyennes s’informent ? Retour sur un dispositif d’enquête original à partir d’entretiens de couple Un exemple de combinaison de méthodes. Les enquêtes (Cevipof) sur « Les perceptions de la probité publique » Experimenting with experiments: a ‘Shandean’ approach The interplay of incentives and mode-choice design in self-administered mixed-mode surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1