Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184253
Charlotte Dolez
Cet article rend compte du dispositif méthodologique mis en place dans ma thèse, qui s’intéresse aux logiques d’exposition, d’attention et d’interprétation des informations. Dans cette optique, je propose de faire dialoguer une perspective de science politique avec les apports de la sociologie des médias pour comprendre le rapport aux informations et de saisir d’une manière qualitative les pratiques médiatiques des individus. J’ai ainsi construit un dispositif original et ludique à partir d’entretiens de couple, qui permet de répondre aux deux défis majeurs que pose le recueil des pratiques médiatiques : leur caractère routinier et quotidien ainsi que la norme civique qu’elles révèlent.
{"title":"Comment les citoyens et les citoyennes s’informent ? Retour sur un dispositif d’enquête original à partir d’entretiens de couple","authors":"Charlotte Dolez","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184253","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article rend compte du dispositif méthodologique mis en place dans ma thèse, qui s’intéresse aux logiques d’exposition, d’attention et d’interprétation des informations. Dans cette optique, je propose de faire dialoguer une perspective de science politique avec les apports de la sociologie des médias pour comprendre le rapport aux informations et de saisir d’une manière qualitative les pratiques médiatiques des individus. J’ai ainsi construit un dispositif original et ludique à partir d’entretiens de couple, qui permet de répondre aux deux défis majeurs que pose le recueil des pratiques médiatiques : leur caractère routinier et quotidien ainsi que la norme civique qu’elles révèlent.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76130559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184242
P. Lascoumes
Cet article rend compte de la combinaison de méthodes réalisées pendant 3 ans par une équipe du CEVIPOF (Sciences Po Paris). Il montre comment les apports des différentes démarches ont permis d’enrichir les autres. Il apporte des résultats de science sociale sur un sujet (la corruption) où les travaux empiriques sont rares.
{"title":"Un exemple de combinaison de méthodes. Les enquêtes (Cevipof) sur « Les perceptions de la probité publique »","authors":"P. Lascoumes","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184242","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article rend compte de la combinaison de méthodes réalisées pendant 3 ans par une équipe du CEVIPOF (Sciences Po Paris). Il montre comment les apports des différentes démarches ont permis d’enrichir les autres. Il apporte des résultats de science sociale sur un sujet (la corruption) où les travaux empiriques sont rares.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77901117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184241
P. Sniderman
An autobiography of the introduction of a method, computer-assisted survey experiments, and an attitude towards science, as iterative, at each step figuring out the next best step to take, learning as you go are the topics. Along the way, Paul M Sniderman presents thoughts on the distinction between prejudice and discrimination, strangers as partners, and a new model of sequential testing.
一本介绍一种方法的自传，计算机辅助调查实验，以及对科学的态度，作为迭代，在每一步中找出下一步最好的步骤，边做边学是主题。一路上，Paul M . Sniderman提出了关于偏见和歧视之间的区别，陌生人作为伴侣，以及一个新的顺序测试模型的想法。
{"title":"Experimenting with experiments: a ‘Shandean’ approach","authors":"P. Sniderman","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184241","url":null,"abstract":"An autobiography of the introduction of a method, computer-assisted survey experiments, and an attitude towards science, as iterative, at each step figuring out the next best step to take, learning as you go are the topics. Along the way, Paul M Sniderman presents thoughts on the distinction between prejudice and discrimination, strangers as partners, and a new model of sequential testing.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81028078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184240
S. Duchesne, Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, Xabier Itçaina, Viviane Le Hay
{"title":"Où il s’avère que la méthode n’entame pas le plafond de verre…","authors":"S. Duchesne, Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, Xabier Itçaina, Viviane Le Hay","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184240","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87117412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184252
A. Bowe, Elizabeth R. Drame, Dominique Duval-Diop, Lynnette Mawhinney, Carla Melaco
BECO designed an Equity Audit tool to measure racial diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within workplaces. The tool has three versions (K-12 schools, For-Profits, and Non-Profits) and is currently undergoing the Standard Setting Process. This study reports on quantitative and qualitative findings for For-Profits and Non-Profits and by doing so, extends the conversation regarding the theoretical, empirical, and practical issues we encounter with the social reality of DEI work. Empirical findings via confirmatory factor analyses reveal at least reasonable fit of the tool which supports the measurement theory undergirding the tool. Qualitative findings demonstrate mixed opinions among experts as to how diversity, equity, and inclusion constructs relate, thus highlighting the unclarity about how we should engage in DEI work in workplaces. Altogether, we discuss findings in relation to the call for empirical work to ground sociological theories and constructs, and the extent to which progression in the field of diversity management aligns with the success and sustainability of DEI work.
{"title":"Measuring DEI within workplaces: questioning the theoretical, empirical, and practical models","authors":"A. Bowe, Elizabeth R. Drame, Dominique Duval-Diop, Lynnette Mawhinney, Carla Melaco","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184252","url":null,"abstract":"BECO designed an Equity Audit tool to measure racial diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within workplaces. The tool has three versions (K-12 schools, For-Profits, and Non-Profits) and is currently undergoing the Standard Setting Process. This study reports on quantitative and qualitative findings for For-Profits and Non-Profits and by doing so, extends the conversation regarding the theoretical, empirical, and practical issues we encounter with the social reality of DEI work. Empirical findings via confirmatory factor analyses reveal at least reasonable fit of the tool which supports the measurement theory undergirding the tool. Qualitative findings demonstrate mixed opinions among experts as to how diversity, equity, and inclusion constructs relate, thus highlighting the unclarity about how we should engage in DEI work in workplaces. Altogether, we discuss findings in relation to the call for empirical work to ground sociological theories and constructs, and the extent to which progression in the field of diversity management aligns with the success and sustainability of DEI work.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86468419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184243
S. Stadtmüller, Christoph Beuthner, Pablo Christmann, Tobias Gummer, Rebekka Kluge, Matthias Sand, Henning Silber
Self-administered mixed-mode surveys are increasingly used as an alternative to face-to-face surveys for collecting data from the general population. However, little is known about how decisions regarding the incentive scheme and the mode-choice design jointly affect key outcomes such as response rates, net sample composition, and survey costs. To study this, we drew a probability sample of the residential population of the city of Mannheim, Germany (N = 2,980) and randomly assigned target persons to one of four incentive schemes (€0, €1, or €2 prepaid incentive on first contact, and €2 delayed prepaid incentive) and one of two mode-choice designs (concurrent or sequential [web-push]). Our results indicate that small prepaid monetary incentives work better in concurrent than in sequential designs. Moreover, a €2 prepaid incentive in a concurrent design proved particularly successful for older target persons, probably reinforcing their sense of trust and reciprocity, while also fitting better with their survey-mode preferences. Finally, a €2 delayed prepaid incentive in a sequential design primarily motivated target persons aged under 50 years. This combination of incentive scheme and mode-choice design also proved to be most cost-effective in that age group. Based on our results, we recommend using sampling frame information on age to address different age groups with different combinations of incentive scheme and mode-choice design. This may help to maximize response rates, achieve a balanced net sample composition, and minimize survey costs.
{"title":"The interplay of incentives and mode-choice design in self-administered mixed-mode surveys","authors":"S. Stadtmüller, Christoph Beuthner, Pablo Christmann, Tobias Gummer, Rebekka Kluge, Matthias Sand, Henning Silber","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184243","url":null,"abstract":"Self-administered mixed-mode surveys are increasingly used as an alternative to face-to-face surveys for collecting data from the general population. However, little is known about how decisions regarding the incentive scheme and the mode-choice design jointly affect key outcomes such as response rates, net sample composition, and survey costs. To study this, we drew a probability sample of the residential population of the city of Mannheim, Germany (N = 2,980) and randomly assigned target persons to one of four incentive schemes (€0, €1, or €2 prepaid incentive on first contact, and €2 delayed prepaid incentive) and one of two mode-choice designs (concurrent or sequential [web-push]). Our results indicate that small prepaid monetary incentives work better in concurrent than in sequential designs. Moreover, a €2 prepaid incentive in a concurrent design proved particularly successful for older target persons, probably reinforcing their sense of trust and reciprocity, while also fitting better with their survey-mode preferences. Finally, a €2 delayed prepaid incentive in a sequential design primarily motivated target persons aged under 50 years. This combination of incentive scheme and mode-choice design also proved to be most cost-effective in that age group. Based on our results, we recommend using sampling frame information on age to address different age groups with different combinations of incentive scheme and mode-choice design. This may help to maximize response rates, achieve a balanced net sample composition, and minimize survey costs.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82536871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231184240a
S. Duchesne, Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, X. Itçaina, Viviane Le Hay
We are delighted to publish two more articles in the “the design of my research” section in which colleagues with prestigious reputations agree to look back over various stages of their careers and to reflect on the place and role survey methods have played in them. This time it is Paul M. Sniderman, known for his work on prejudice, who has greatly contributed to the development of an experimental approach to opinion; and Pierre Lascoumes, a sociologist of law and public action, who at one point in his career was called on to supervise a collective project on the representations of probity. We are very grateful to these colleagues for having accepted our invitation, each in their own way, and for offering us the fruits of their reflections, while observing how difficult it is to anticipate the way in which each of them will interpret the proposal we are making. There is no need here for inclusive writing as we are struggling to find female colleagues available for the adventure. Nonna Mayer kindly agreed to take part early on, as did Christine Musselin, and we thank them. However, this means there are only two testimonies from women for every ten contributions from men. Seeing this, we had the idea of having a quick look at the overall publications in BMS over the last five years and we were surprised to see the overall ratio was also very unbalanced, especially when removing from the count the contributions to the two guest issues on children and gender, both of which mostly contained articles (co-)authored by women. We do not have the means here to put these observations into perspective with the kind of articles published in general social science journals. All we can say is this result surprised us. We had indeed felt that since methods are not a particularly renowned field in our disciplines, they should be more easily open to women’s work. Apparently this is not the case. We are interested in the issue and will certainly return to it in a future editorial. In addition, we will double our efforts to convince women colleagues to contribute to this section. For now, we hope you will enjoy the two new contributions by Paul Sniderman and Pierre Lascoumes, whom we thank again. This issue also includes two ‘implementation’ articles, both of which focus on data collection. The first, written by Sven Stadtmüller in collaboration with several colleagues from GESIS in Mannheim, examines the efficiency of mixed-mode selfadministered surveys, focusing in particular on how different incentive systems and mode choice designs influence response rates, net sample composition and survey costs, depending in particular on the age of respondents. The second, also co-authored, with Anica Bowe as corresponding author, presents the NGO BECO’s Equity Audit tool, designed to measure racial diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace. The tool is assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The
我们很高兴在“我的研究设计”部分再发表两篇文章，在这两篇文章中，享有盛誉的同事们同意回顾他们职业生涯的各个阶段，并反思调查方法在其中所起的作用和地位。这一次，以研究偏见而闻名的保罗·m·斯奈德曼(Paul M. Sniderman)为研究意见的实验方法的发展做出了巨大贡献;以及研究法律和公共行为的社会学家皮埃尔·拉斯库梅斯(Pierre Lascoumes)，在他的职业生涯中，他曾一度被要求监督一个关于诚信表现的集体项目。我们非常感谢这些同事以各自的方式接受了我们的邀请，并向我们提供了他们的思考成果，同时注意到预测他们每个人将以何种方式解释我们正在提出的建议是多么困难。这里不需要包容性的写作，因为我们正在努力寻找可以参加这次冒险的女同事。Nonna Mayer很早就同意参加，Christine Musselin也同意参加，我们感谢他们。然而，这意味着每十个男性的贡献中只有两个来自女性的证词。看到这一点，我们想到快速浏览一下BMS过去五年的总体出版物，我们惊讶地发现，总体比例也非常不平衡，特别是当我们把关于儿童和性别的两期客座杂志的贡献从统计中删除时，这两期杂志的文章大多是由女性(共同)撰写的。在这里，我们没有办法用发表在一般社会科学期刊上的文章来看待这些观察结果。我们只能说这个结果让我们大吃一惊。我们确实认为，由于方法在我们的学科中不是一个特别著名的领域，因此应该更容易向妇女开放。显然情况并非如此。我们对这个问题很感兴趣，一定会在以后的社论中再讨论这个问题。此外，我们将加倍努力说服女同事为这一节作出贡献。现在，我们希望你们能喜欢保罗·斯奈德曼和皮埃尔·拉斯库梅斯的两个新贡献，我们再次感谢他们。本期还包括两篇“实施”文章，均侧重于数据收集。第一份报告由Sven stadtm ller与曼海姆GESIS的几位同事合作撰写，研究了混合模式自我管理调查的效率，特别关注不同的激励制度和模式选择设计如何影响回复率、净样本组成和调查成本，特别是取决于受访者的年龄。第二份报告也是由安妮卡·鲍(Anica Bowe)作为通讯作者共同撰写的，介绍了非政府组织BECO的公平审计工具，旨在衡量工作场所的种族多样性、公平和包容性。对该工具进行定量和定性评估。的
{"title":"Where it turns out that the method does not break the glass ceiling…","authors":"S. Duchesne, Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, X. Itçaina, Viviane Le Hay","doi":"10.1177/07591063231184240a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231184240a","url":null,"abstract":"We are delighted to publish two more articles in the “the design of my research” section in which colleagues with prestigious reputations agree to look back over various stages of their careers and to reflect on the place and role survey methods have played in them. This time it is Paul M. Sniderman, known for his work on prejudice, who has greatly contributed to the development of an experimental approach to opinion; and Pierre Lascoumes, a sociologist of law and public action, who at one point in his career was called on to supervise a collective project on the representations of probity. We are very grateful to these colleagues for having accepted our invitation, each in their own way, and for offering us the fruits of their reflections, while observing how difficult it is to anticipate the way in which each of them will interpret the proposal we are making. There is no need here for inclusive writing as we are struggling to find female colleagues available for the adventure. Nonna Mayer kindly agreed to take part early on, as did Christine Musselin, and we thank them. However, this means there are only two testimonies from women for every ten contributions from men. Seeing this, we had the idea of having a quick look at the overall publications in BMS over the last five years and we were surprised to see the overall ratio was also very unbalanced, especially when removing from the count the contributions to the two guest issues on children and gender, both of which mostly contained articles (co-)authored by women. We do not have the means here to put these observations into perspective with the kind of articles published in general social science journals. All we can say is this result surprised us. We had indeed felt that since methods are not a particularly renowned field in our disciplines, they should be more easily open to women’s work. Apparently this is not the case. We are interested in the issue and will certainly return to it in a future editorial. In addition, we will double our efforts to convince women colleagues to contribute to this section. For now, we hope you will enjoy the two new contributions by Paul Sniderman and Pierre Lascoumes, whom we thank again. This issue also includes two ‘implementation’ articles, both of which focus on data collection. The first, written by Sven Stadtmüller in collaboration with several colleagues from GESIS in Mannheim, examines the efficiency of mixed-mode selfadministered surveys, focusing in particular on how different incentive systems and mode choice designs influence response rates, net sample composition and survey costs, depending in particular on the age of respondents. The second, also co-authored, with Anica Bowe as corresponding author, presents the NGO BECO’s Equity Audit tool, designed to measure racial diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace. The tool is assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75587641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231160284
A. Kaboré, R. Kaboré
L’objet de cet article méthodologique est de présenter, de façon réflexive, une autre démarche d’enquête expérimentée en socio-anthropologie comme solution à l’impossibilité de se rendre sur le terrain d’enquête à cause de l’insécurité « terroriste » qui y sévit. L’étude a pour terrain l’Est burkinabè et, pour sujet, les liens entre « terrorisme » et aires protégées. Nous avons testé l’« enquête ex-situ » par déplacement des enquêté.es et entretiens téléphoniques. La méthode se révèle porteuse d’un potentiel heuristique, méthodologique et épistémologique considérable. L’article invite à questionner la tradition méthodologique ethnographique empruntée par la socio-anthropologie au regard de la multiplication des « terrains impossibles » et des opportunités offertes par les technologies modernes de transport et de communication.
{"title":"Enquête socio-anthropologique ex-situ : leçons méthodologiques d’une expérience en zone d’insécurité « terroriste » dans la région de l’est du Burkina Faso","authors":"A. Kaboré, R. Kaboré","doi":"10.1177/07591063231160284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231160284","url":null,"abstract":"L’objet de cet article méthodologique est de présenter, de façon réflexive, une autre démarche d’enquête expérimentée en socio-anthropologie comme solution à l’impossibilité de se rendre sur le terrain d’enquête à cause de l’insécurité « terroriste » qui y sévit. L’étude a pour terrain l’Est burkinabè et, pour sujet, les liens entre « terrorisme » et aires protégées. Nous avons testé l’« enquête ex-situ » par déplacement des enquêté.es et entretiens téléphoniques. La méthode se révèle porteuse d’un potentiel heuristique, méthodologique et épistémologique considérable. L’article invite à questionner la tradition méthodologique ethnographique empruntée par la socio-anthropologie au regard de la multiplication des « terrains impossibles » et des opportunités offertes par les technologies modernes de transport et de communication.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74259609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231160230a
Sophie Duchesne, Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, Viviane Le Hay, X. Itçaina
{"title":"A proudly niche journal","authors":"Sophie Duchesne, Ahmed Fouad El Haddad, Viviane Le Hay, X. Itçaina","doi":"10.1177/07591063231160230a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231160230a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85489507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1177/07591063231160287
Léo Joubert, Olivier Lê Van Truoc, P. Mercklé, Benoît Tudoux
Comme c’est souvent le cas dans les enquêtes en ligne, et a fortiori dans celles reposant sur des échantillons « spontanés », celui de l’enquête Vico est caractérisé par un certain nombre de biais : les répondant·es sont beaucoup plus souvent issu·es des catégories favorisées et diplômées que l’ensemble de la population, et les femmes y sont également bien plus nombreuses que les hommes. Cet article propose une technique de redressement de ces biais, et en discute l’efficacité.
{"title":"Redresser l’échantillon d’une enquête en ligne : un exemple à partir de l’enquête Vico","authors":"Léo Joubert, Olivier Lê Van Truoc, P. Mercklé, Benoît Tudoux","doi":"10.1177/07591063231160287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063231160287","url":null,"abstract":"Comme c’est souvent le cas dans les enquêtes en ligne, et a fortiori dans celles reposant sur des échantillons « spontanés », celui de l’enquête Vico est caractérisé par un certain nombre de biais : les répondant·es sont beaucoup plus souvent issu·es des catégories favorisées et diplômées que l’ensemble de la population, et les femmes y sont également bien plus nombreuses que les hommes. Cet article propose une technique de redressement de ces biais, et en discute l’efficacité.","PeriodicalId":38437,"journal":{"name":"BMS-Bulletin of Sociological Methodology-Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77994104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：