Differentiation between drug-type, fibre-type and intermediate-type in cannabis samples: HPLC-UV versus GC-FID

Kian Kadkhodaei, Nina Biei, E. Vidiella, Pamela Osmenaj, G. Cannazza, M. Schmid
{"title":"Differentiation between drug-type, fibre-type and intermediate-type in cannabis samples: HPLC-UV versus GC-FID","authors":"Kian Kadkhodaei, Nina Biei, E. Vidiella, Pamela Osmenaj, G. Cannazza, M. Schmid","doi":"10.25082/JPBR.2020.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cannabis sativa is known to be the most abused illegal drug worldwide. To date it is not only used as a medicine but has been established as a lifestyle product. The most relevant phytocannabinoids represent the ingredients delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), whereby only 9-THC shows a psychoactive effect. Since 2017, the so-called CBD-hemp containing CBD as main ingredient is distributed in many countries as a legal alternative. In these products, 9-THC must not exceed a certain percentage. It is hardly possible to differentiate between THC-hemp and CBD-hemp presenting a major challenge for authorities. Therefore, there is the need to develop fast and efficient analysis methods to distinguish between fibre-type, drug-type and intermediate-type cannabis products. The aim of this study was to compare two simple and inexpensive HPLC-UV and GC-FID methods for their ability to quantify phytocannabinoids in dried cannabis plant material. For this purpose, a set of 37 fresh and dried cannabis samples randomly chosen from seizures of Austrian police was subject to complementary quantification of 9-THC and CBD. After having taken into account decomposition of certain phytocannabinoids, the result of this quantitative study showed good correlation between HPLC-UV and GC-FID regardless of quantifying cannabis leaves or buds.","PeriodicalId":16703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Research","volume":"338 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25082/JPBR.2020.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis sativa is known to be the most abused illegal drug worldwide. To date it is not only used as a medicine but has been established as a lifestyle product. The most relevant phytocannabinoids represent the ingredients delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), whereby only 9-THC shows a psychoactive effect. Since 2017, the so-called CBD-hemp containing CBD as main ingredient is distributed in many countries as a legal alternative. In these products, 9-THC must not exceed a certain percentage. It is hardly possible to differentiate between THC-hemp and CBD-hemp presenting a major challenge for authorities. Therefore, there is the need to develop fast and efficient analysis methods to distinguish between fibre-type, drug-type and intermediate-type cannabis products. The aim of this study was to compare two simple and inexpensive HPLC-UV and GC-FID methods for their ability to quantify phytocannabinoids in dried cannabis plant material. For this purpose, a set of 37 fresh and dried cannabis samples randomly chosen from seizures of Austrian police was subject to complementary quantification of 9-THC and CBD. After having taken into account decomposition of certain phytocannabinoids, the result of this quantitative study showed good correlation between HPLC-UV and GC-FID regardless of quantifying cannabis leaves or buds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻样品中药物型、纤维型和中间型的鉴别:HPLC-UV vs GC-FID
众所周知,大麻是世界上滥用最多的非法药物。迄今为止,它不仅被用作药物,而且已被确立为一种生活方式产品。最相关的植物大麻素代表成分δ -9-四氢大麻酚(9-THC)和大麻二酚(CBD),其中只有9-THC显示精神活性作用。自2017年以来,以CBD为主要成分的所谓CBD-hemp作为合法替代品在许多国家销售。在这些产品中,9-THC不得超过一定的百分比。几乎不可能区分thc -大麻和cbd -大麻,这对当局来说是一个重大挑战。因此,有必要开发快速有效的分析方法来区分纤维型、药物型和中间型大麻产品。本研究的目的是比较两种简单且廉价的HPLC-UV和GC-FID方法对干燥大麻植物材料中植物大麻素的定量能力。为此,从奥地利警方缴获的大麻中随机抽取了37份新鲜和干燥的大麻样本,对9-THC和CBD进行了补充定量。在考虑了某些植物大麻素的分解后,本定量研究的结果显示,无论对大麻叶还是芽进行定量,HPLC-UV和GC-FID都具有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The clinical and regulatory status of NDSRI: A global imperative A big threat : Aflatoxin Determination of pesticide residues and heavy metals in Adhatoda Vasaka Linn. TAAR1 as a new target for the treatment of bipolar disorder: Anti-manic and anti-depressant activity of the novel agonist PCC0105004 A novel role of NK3 receptor signaling in bipolar disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1