Responses to abuse, neglect, and trauma of children with intellectual disability

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIAL WORK Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI:10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id884
K. L. Simpson, P. Yeung, R. Munford
{"title":"Responses to abuse, neglect, and trauma of children with intellectual disability","authors":"K. L. Simpson, P. Yeung, R. Munford","doi":"10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: Children with intellectual disabilities are three to four times more likely to be abused and neglected than their peers without intellectual disabilities. While the Children’s Action Plan and Children’s Act (2014) aim to keep children safe and ensure their needs are met, much of the focus still treats children as a homogenous group with limited reference to children with disability. The current research focused on exploring the experiences and perspectives of social workers and health practitioners to abuse, neglect, and trauma among children with intellectual disabilities.\nMETHODS: In 2020, eight participants were first involved in a focus group to provide a wider perspective of practice and policy issues of abuse, neglect, and trauma among children with intellectual disability. This was followed by a more in-depth exploration and investigation with four experienced social workers to understand the issues and challenges in supporting this cohort of children and to identify what best practices are needed to strengthen service provision.\nFINDINGS: Results of the study indicated that, to ensure safety and implement support interventions, practitioners need to be equipped with knowledge about disability and its related needs. Furthermore, to influence positive and transformative change, a strong relational practice with children with intellectual disabilities, their wh nau and family is paramount.\nCONCLUSION: Practitioners are urged to draw on knowledge and skills, such as relational practice, socio-ecological frameworks, human rights and social justice, and advocacy to develop appropriate assessments and interventions to support children with intellectual disabilities and their wellbeing.","PeriodicalId":44524,"journal":{"name":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PURPOSE: Children with intellectual disabilities are three to four times more likely to be abused and neglected than their peers without intellectual disabilities. While the Children’s Action Plan and Children’s Act (2014) aim to keep children safe and ensure their needs are met, much of the focus still treats children as a homogenous group with limited reference to children with disability. The current research focused on exploring the experiences and perspectives of social workers and health practitioners to abuse, neglect, and trauma among children with intellectual disabilities. METHODS: In 2020, eight participants were first involved in a focus group to provide a wider perspective of practice and policy issues of abuse, neglect, and trauma among children with intellectual disability. This was followed by a more in-depth exploration and investigation with four experienced social workers to understand the issues and challenges in supporting this cohort of children and to identify what best practices are needed to strengthen service provision. FINDINGS: Results of the study indicated that, to ensure safety and implement support interventions, practitioners need to be equipped with knowledge about disability and its related needs. Furthermore, to influence positive and transformative change, a strong relational practice with children with intellectual disabilities, their wh nau and family is paramount. CONCLUSION: Practitioners are urged to draw on knowledge and skills, such as relational practice, socio-ecological frameworks, human rights and social justice, and advocacy to develop appropriate assessments and interventions to support children with intellectual disabilities and their wellbeing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对智力残疾儿童的虐待、忽视和创伤的反应
目的:智障儿童被虐待和忽视的可能性是无智障儿童的三到四倍。虽然《儿童行动计划》和《儿童法》(2014年)旨在保护儿童的安全,确保他们的需求得到满足,但大部分焦点仍然将儿童视为一个同质群体,对残疾儿童的关注有限。目前的研究重点是探索社会工作者和卫生从业人员对智力残疾儿童的虐待、忽视和创伤的经验和观点。方法:2020年,8名参与者首次参与了一个焦点小组,为智力残疾儿童的虐待、忽视和创伤的实践和政策问题提供了更广泛的视角。随后,四名经验丰富的社会工作者进行了更深入的探索和调查,以了解支持这群儿童的问题和挑战,并确定需要哪些最佳做法来加强服务提供。结果:研究结果表明,为了确保安全和实施支持干预措施,从业人员需要具备有关残疾及其相关需求的知识。此外,为了影响积极和变革性的变化,与智力残疾儿童、他们的父母和家庭建立牢固的关系是至关重要的。结论:敦促从业人员利用知识和技能,如关系实践、社会生态框架、人权和社会正义,以及倡导制定适当的评估和干预措施,以支持智障儿童及其福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pacific social work navigating practice, policy and research Resistance, reclaiming and reframing: Relationship-based Pacific social work practice Disrupting Whiteness in Social Work Fieldwork placement reflection from a regional Pacific university during Covid-19 The Fono's 'Alert Level 4' Story
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1