Respect for the right to defense at the disposal of judicial expertise

Iurie Odagiu, Artiom Pilat
{"title":"Respect for the right to defense at the disposal of judicial expertise","authors":"Iurie Odagiu, Artiom Pilat","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2021.4(246).06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The observance of the right to defense at the disposal of the judicial expertise represents a positive obligation of the criminal investigation body and consists of several obligations specified in art. 142 - 153 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In order to ensure the person's rights to a fair trial, in accordance with the provisions of art. 145 para. 1. The CPC, the criminal investigation body, the prosecutor or the court, if it orders the conduct of the forensic examination, shall inform the parties in writing of the subject matter of the forensic examination and the questions to be answered by the expert and explain to the parties that they have the right to to comment on these questions and to request their amendment or completion, as well as the right to request the appointment of an expert recommended by each of them to participate in the conduct of the forensic examination. If it does not appear from the case-file that the parties participated in the examination or had the opportunity to ask the specialist questions, which indicates that the evidence cannot be based on the conviction, if the accused party is restricted the right to defense.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.4(246).06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The observance of the right to defense at the disposal of the judicial expertise represents a positive obligation of the criminal investigation body and consists of several obligations specified in art. 142 - 153 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In order to ensure the person's rights to a fair trial, in accordance with the provisions of art. 145 para. 1. The CPC, the criminal investigation body, the prosecutor or the court, if it orders the conduct of the forensic examination, shall inform the parties in writing of the subject matter of the forensic examination and the questions to be answered by the expert and explain to the parties that they have the right to to comment on these questions and to request their amendment or completion, as well as the right to request the appointment of an expert recommended by each of them to participate in the conduct of the forensic examination. If it does not appear from the case-file that the parties participated in the examination or had the opportunity to ask the specialist questions, which indicates that the evidence cannot be based on the conviction, if the accused party is restricted the right to defense.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尊重利用司法鉴定的辩护权
在司法专门知识的支配下遵守辩护权是刑事调查机构的一项积极义务,由第2条规定的若干义务组成。刑事诉讼法第142 - 153条。为了确保个人获得公平审判的权利,按照第2条的规定。145帕。1. 中国共产党、刑事侦查机关、检察官或者法院裁定进行法医鉴定的,应当将法医鉴定的内容和需要专家回答的问题书面通知当事人,并说明当事人有权对这些问题提出意见和要求修改或者补充的权利;以及有权要求任命他们各自推荐的一名专家参与进行法医检查。如果从案卷来看,当事人没有参加审查或有机会询问专家问题,这表明证据不能以定罪为基础,如果被告一方的辩护权受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aggravating circumstances of the crime of disclosure of state secret Strategies and tactics for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia through the prism of international law Contesting the conclusion of the rejection of the application for lifting the exception of unconstitutionality: the attitude of the Constitutional Court Protection of honor, dignity and business reputation of citizens in international law Translation of legal language and the problem of equivalence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1