An autoethnography of automated powerlessness: lacking platform affordances in Instagram and TikTok account deletions

IF 2.3 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Media, Culture & Society Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1177/01634437221140531
C. Are
{"title":"An autoethnography of automated powerlessness: lacking platform affordances in Instagram and TikTok account deletions","authors":"C. Are","doi":"10.1177/01634437221140531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situated within the field of platform governance studies, this paper shares findings from an ‘autoethnography of automated powerlessness’, drawing from the researcher’s disempowering experience of being a heavily moderated social media user. Using theoretical frameworks blending affordances and World Risk Society theories, this paper contextualises my experiences of moderation of my pole dance instructor, activist and blogger account @bloggeronpole from February to October 2021 within social media’s broader de-platforming of nudity and sexuality, finding fallacies within platforms’ own affordances, which lack mechanisms to aid or rehabilitate de-platformed accounts. With little to no information from platforms about the details of their moderation, qualitative, ethnographic and autoethnographic explorations of their governance are all users currently have to fight and understand their puritan, patriarchal censorship of nudity and sexuality, which are often conflated with risk. This study concludes with recommendations for different options for better, more equal and community focused moderation.","PeriodicalId":18417,"journal":{"name":"Media, Culture & Society","volume":"103 1","pages":"822 - 840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221140531","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Situated within the field of platform governance studies, this paper shares findings from an ‘autoethnography of automated powerlessness’, drawing from the researcher’s disempowering experience of being a heavily moderated social media user. Using theoretical frameworks blending affordances and World Risk Society theories, this paper contextualises my experiences of moderation of my pole dance instructor, activist and blogger account @bloggeronpole from February to October 2021 within social media’s broader de-platforming of nudity and sexuality, finding fallacies within platforms’ own affordances, which lack mechanisms to aid or rehabilitate de-platformed accounts. With little to no information from platforms about the details of their moderation, qualitative, ethnographic and autoethnographic explorations of their governance are all users currently have to fight and understand their puritan, patriarchal censorship of nudity and sexuality, which are often conflated with risk. This study concludes with recommendations for different options for better, more equal and community focused moderation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动无力的自我民族志:在Instagram和TikTok账户删除中缺乏平台支持
本文位于平台治理研究领域,分享了“自动无能为力的自我民族志”的发现,这些发现来自于研究人员作为一个重度缓和的社交媒体用户的丧失权力的经历。本文使用混合支持和世界风险社会理论的理论框架,将我的钢管舞教练、活动家和博主账户@bloggeronpole在2021年2月至10月期间在社交媒体对裸体和性行为的更广泛的去平台化过程中的适度经历纳入背景,发现平台自身支持中的谬误,这些支持缺乏帮助或恢复去平台化账户的机制。由于平台几乎没有关于其节制细节的信息,对其治理的定性、民族志和自我民族志探索,所有用户目前都必须对抗和理解他们对裸体和性行为的清教徒式、父权制审查,这往往与风险混为一谈。这项研究最后提出了更好、更平等和以社区为中心的不同选择的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Media, Culture & Society provides a major international forum for the presentation of research and discussion concerning the media, including the newer information and communication technologies, within their political, economic, cultural and historical contexts. It regularly engages with a wider range of issues in cultural and social analysis. Its focus is on substantive topics and on critique and innovation in theory and method. An interdisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions in any relevant areas and from a worldwide authorship.
期刊最新文献
The streaming industry and the platform economy: An analysis Appearing to disappear: Ordering visibility in a Turkish border spectacle By sharing our loss, we fight: Collective expressions of grief in the digital age TikTok and the platformisation from China: Geopolitical anxieties, repetitive creativities and future imaginaries Authentic cult: media representations of cultural consumption and legitimization of cultural hierarchies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1