Of Hypocrites, Whores, and Holy Animal Bones. Polemical Comparisons and the Invective Mode in Early Reformation Disputes

Q1 Arts and Humanities Entangled Religions Pub Date : 2022-10-18 DOI:10.46586/er.11.2022.9847
A. Kästner
{"title":"Of Hypocrites, Whores, and Holy Animal Bones. Polemical Comparisons and the Invective Mode in Early Reformation Disputes","authors":"A. Kästner","doi":"10.46586/er.11.2022.9847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to illustrate how a pervasively invective mode of communication was pivotal for early Reformation disputes. For this purpose, it explores, first, specific techniques of polemical comparison used in invective communication. Second, it analyses the relation between a broader transregional public discourse and debates at the local level. Some of the sources examined in this article, for instance a handwritten pasquinade whose anonymous author fiercely criticized a Franciscan preacher, as well as a creatively adapted letter of indulgence, are new to Reformation research. The objective here is to outline decisive and entangled aspects of (semi-)public communication between 1520 and 1524. In order to do so, I focus on the beginning of early Reformation conflicts, their ongoing volatility, and their performative zenith, along the border of two of the most important German territories at the time—the Ernestine Electorate and the Albertine Duchy of Saxony.","PeriodicalId":36421,"journal":{"name":"Entangled Religions","volume":"386 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entangled Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.11.2022.9847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to illustrate how a pervasively invective mode of communication was pivotal for early Reformation disputes. For this purpose, it explores, first, specific techniques of polemical comparison used in invective communication. Second, it analyses the relation between a broader transregional public discourse and debates at the local level. Some of the sources examined in this article, for instance a handwritten pasquinade whose anonymous author fiercely criticized a Franciscan preacher, as well as a creatively adapted letter of indulgence, are new to Reformation research. The objective here is to outline decisive and entangled aspects of (semi-)public communication between 1520 and 1524. In order to do so, I focus on the beginning of early Reformation conflicts, their ongoing volatility, and their performative zenith, along the border of two of the most important German territories at the time—the Ernestine Electorate and the Albertine Duchy of Saxony.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伪君子,妓女和神圣动物的骨头。早期宗教改革之争中的论战比较与谩骂模式
本文旨在说明一种无处不在的谩骂方式是如何在早期宗教改革纠纷中发挥关键作用的。为此,本文首先探讨了谩骂交际中使用的辩论性比较的具体技巧。其次,它分析了更广泛的跨区域公共话语与地方层面辩论之间的关系。本文考察的一些资料来源,例如一封手写的pasquinade,其匿名作者激烈地批评了一位方济会传教士,以及一封创造性改编的放纵信,对宗教改革研究来说都是新的。本文的目的是概述1520年至1524年间(半)公共通信的决定性和纠缠性方面。为了做到这一点,我将重点放在早期宗教改革冲突的开始,它们持续的波动,以及它们在当时最重要的两个德国领土的边界上的表现顶峰——埃内斯廷选帝侯和萨克森的阿尔贝蒂娜公国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Entangled Religions
Entangled Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cursing Beyond the Grave: Imprecations and Jewish Funerary Culture in Antiquity Deconverted Hearts in a Deconverted Church Conversions to Shiʿism in Italy and Editorial Ventures Intuition, Rebellion and Tradition Reversion, Revival, Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1