Analyzing Carbon Conversion Factors of Four Species of Taiwanese Bamboo

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI:10.7075/TJFS.201112.0030
Yu-Jen Lin, Chiu-Hsien Wang, Sara W. Wu
{"title":"Analyzing Carbon Conversion Factors of Four Species of Taiwanese Bamboo","authors":"Yu-Jen Lin, Chiu-Hsien Wang, Sara W. Wu","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.201112.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the carbon conversion factor (CCF) is a key parameter for estimating the amount of carbon sequestered in a forest stand. The guidelines suggest that CCF can be calculated by converting the total biomass or bulk density (BD) of plants, and multiplying by the estimated percent carbon content (PCC). There are many relevant studies on the CCF of trees, but little research has been done on the CCF of bamboo. This study focused on the analysis of different CCFs among 4 major bamboo species found in Taiwan: Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla: Ph), Makino bamboo (P. makinoi: Pm), ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus: Dl), and thorny bamboo (Bambusa stenostachya: Bs). Various sites, ages, and positions in the culm were examined, and the resulting BD and PCC were simultaneously analyzed. The results show that the CCF significantly varied among species, sites, and positions in the culm, but showed no significant differences between age for Ph and Bs, and only partly significant differences for Pm and Dl. Variations in the CCF with the position in culm in all 4 bamboo species had the same trend: upper section > middle section > lower section. Average CCFs for a single culm of Pm, Ph, Bs, and Dl were 0.357, 0.318, 0.281, and 0.234, respectively. The results will be useful in increasing the estimation accuracy of carbon sequestration of local bamboo stands in Taiwan.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.201112.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

According to guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the carbon conversion factor (CCF) is a key parameter for estimating the amount of carbon sequestered in a forest stand. The guidelines suggest that CCF can be calculated by converting the total biomass or bulk density (BD) of plants, and multiplying by the estimated percent carbon content (PCC). There are many relevant studies on the CCF of trees, but little research has been done on the CCF of bamboo. This study focused on the analysis of different CCFs among 4 major bamboo species found in Taiwan: Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla: Ph), Makino bamboo (P. makinoi: Pm), ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus: Dl), and thorny bamboo (Bambusa stenostachya: Bs). Various sites, ages, and positions in the culm were examined, and the resulting BD and PCC were simultaneously analyzed. The results show that the CCF significantly varied among species, sites, and positions in the culm, but showed no significant differences between age for Ph and Bs, and only partly significant differences for Pm and Dl. Variations in the CCF with the position in culm in all 4 bamboo species had the same trend: upper section > middle section > lower section. Average CCFs for a single culm of Pm, Ph, Bs, and Dl were 0.357, 0.318, 0.281, and 0.234, respectively. The results will be useful in increasing the estimation accuracy of carbon sequestration of local bamboo stands in Taiwan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种台湾竹的碳转化因子分析
根据政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的指导方针,碳转换因子(CCF)是估算林分碳固存量的关键参数。该指南建议,CCF可以通过转换植物的总生物量或体积密度(BD)并乘以估计的碳含量百分比(PCC)来计算。关于树木的碳流变特性的相关研究很多,但对竹子碳流变特性的研究却很少。本研究主要分析台湾4种主要竹种毛竹(Phyllostachys heterocycla: Ph)、牧野竹(P. makinoi: Pm)、麻竹(Dendrocalamus latiflorus: Dl)和多刺竹(Bambusa stenostachya: Bs)的CCFs差异。研究了茎的不同部位、年龄和位置,并同时分析了得到的BD和PCC。结果表明:CCF在不同种类、不同地点和不同位置间存在显著差异,但Ph和Bs在不同年龄间无显著差异,Pm和Dl在不同年龄间存在部分显著差异。4种竹材CCF随茎位的变化趋势均为上部>中部>下部。Pm、Ph、Bs和Dl的平均CCFs分别为0.357、0.318、0.281和0.234。研究结果将有助于提高台湾地区竹林固碳估算的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.
期刊最新文献
Pinus sylvestris Can Form Ectomycorrhiza with Phialocephala fortinii Carbon Storage and Density of Forest Ecosystems in Heilongjiang Province, China Building allometric models to estimate above-ground and below-ground biomass of mahogany sapling. Effects of Soil Properties on Restoring Indigenous Plants in Coral Reef Landscapes Response variations of Alnus subcordata (L.), Populus deltoides (Bartr. ex Marsh.), and Taxodium distichum (L.) seedlings to flooding stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1