The Defeat of Scientific Racism

IF 2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Women-A Cultural Review Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/09574042.2022.2072616
H. Carr
{"title":"The Defeat of Scientific Racism","authors":"H. Carr","doi":"10.1080/09574042.2022.2072616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charles King is a distinguished American commentator on the recent history of the Balkans and the Near East, but in this striking intervention in political debate the time and place of his concerns are very different. He has turned his attention to the United States in the first half of the twentieth century, particularly the interwar years, concentrating on the development of the discipline of anthropology and centring on the figure of Franz Boas, a humane, courageous and farsighted German Jew, and on the group of women anthropologists he taught and fostered. By the time of Boas’ death in 1942, his arguments for racial equality were widely accepted, as the US entered a war against the horrors of Aryan supremacy. Charles King wrote his book in the last days of the Trump presidency when racism had become once more accepted, powerful and corrosive. It hadn’t of course ever gone away, but it was once more the norm for a terrifyingly large and influential number of Americans. King only mentions Trump once, but his message is clear. Boas had a number of distinguished male students, many of them Jewish immigrants like himself, and their own ground-breaking work helped to spread his insights and values throughout the States. But King concentrates on his female students who had a much harder battle. They needed Boas’ ongoing help to find enough financial support to practice anthropology at all. It wasn’t that there hadn’t been women anthropologists before—it had been a wonderful escape from drawing-room life for some well-to-do women in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, somewhere they could be in charge for once and where no-one contradicted them. But gaining an academic position was a very different matter. King concentrates on four women. There is Margaret Mead, with her genius for attracting attention and book sales. Then Ruth Benedict, for years ignored and marginalized, but who eventually, after the war and Charles King, The Reinvention of Humanity: A Story of Race, Sex, Gender and the Discovery of Culture, Bodley Head, 2019, £25, 9781847924490","PeriodicalId":54053,"journal":{"name":"Women-A Cultural Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"247 - 252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women-A Cultural Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2022.2072616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Charles King is a distinguished American commentator on the recent history of the Balkans and the Near East, but in this striking intervention in political debate the time and place of his concerns are very different. He has turned his attention to the United States in the first half of the twentieth century, particularly the interwar years, concentrating on the development of the discipline of anthropology and centring on the figure of Franz Boas, a humane, courageous and farsighted German Jew, and on the group of women anthropologists he taught and fostered. By the time of Boas’ death in 1942, his arguments for racial equality were widely accepted, as the US entered a war against the horrors of Aryan supremacy. Charles King wrote his book in the last days of the Trump presidency when racism had become once more accepted, powerful and corrosive. It hadn’t of course ever gone away, but it was once more the norm for a terrifyingly large and influential number of Americans. King only mentions Trump once, but his message is clear. Boas had a number of distinguished male students, many of them Jewish immigrants like himself, and their own ground-breaking work helped to spread his insights and values throughout the States. But King concentrates on his female students who had a much harder battle. They needed Boas’ ongoing help to find enough financial support to practice anthropology at all. It wasn’t that there hadn’t been women anthropologists before—it had been a wonderful escape from drawing-room life for some well-to-do women in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, somewhere they could be in charge for once and where no-one contradicted them. But gaining an academic position was a very different matter. King concentrates on four women. There is Margaret Mead, with her genius for attracting attention and book sales. Then Ruth Benedict, for years ignored and marginalized, but who eventually, after the war and Charles King, The Reinvention of Humanity: A Story of Race, Sex, Gender and the Discovery of Culture, Bodley Head, 2019, £25, 9781847924490
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学种族主义的失败
查尔斯·金(Charles King)是一位杰出的美国评论家,研究巴尔干半岛和近东地区的近代史,但在这次对政治辩论的引人注目的干预中,他所关注的时间和地点都非常不同。他将注意力转向了20世纪上半叶的美国,特别是两次世界大战之间的年代,集中于人类学学科的发展,以及弗朗茨·博阿斯(Franz Boas)——一位仁慈、勇敢、有远见的德国犹太人——的形象,以及他所教授和培养的一群女性人类学家。到1942年鲍亚士去世时,他关于种族平等的论点已被广泛接受,因为美国加入了一场反对雅利安人至上主义恐怖的战争。查尔斯·金在特朗普总统任期的最后几天写了这本书,当时种族主义再次被接受、强大和具有腐蚀性。当然,它从来没有消失过,但它再次成为一大批有影响力的美国人的常态。金只提到了特朗普一次,但他的信息很明确。鲍亚士有许多杰出的男学生,其中许多是像他一样的犹太移民,他们自己开创性的工作,帮助他的见解和价值观传播到整个美国。但金把注意力集中在那些经历了更艰难战斗的女学生身上。他们需要鲍亚士持续的帮助,才能找到足够的经济支持来实践人类学。这并不是说以前没有女性人类学家——在19世纪末和20世纪初,对于一些富裕的女性来说,这是一种逃离客厅生活的美妙方式,在某个地方,她们可以一次掌控一切,而且没有人反对她们。但获得一个学术职位是完全不同的事情。金把注意力集中在四个女人身上。有玛格丽特·米德,她在吸引注意力和书籍销售方面具有天赋。然后是露丝·本尼迪克特,多年来被忽视和边缘化,但在战争和查尔斯·金之后,她最终出版了《人性的重塑:一个关于种族、性、性别和文化发现的故事》,博德利黑德出版社,2019年,25英镑,9781847924490
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women-A Cultural Review
Women-A Cultural Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
About Our Contributors Living with the Ancestors Feminist Depictions of Coercive Control in ‘Domestic Noir’: Ilsa Evans’s Broken (2007) and Kathryn Heyman’s Storm and Grace (2017) Colonized Brown Motherhood: Em and the Big Hoom, Imelda and Indian Mothering Introduction: Imagining and Reimagining Emotional Labour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1