{"title":"THE LEGACY OF LOGICAL EMPIRICISM","authors":"M. Prabhakar","doi":"10.5040/9781474290333.ch-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logical empiricism is a philosophic movement rather than a set of doctrines, and it flourished in the 1920s and 30s in several centers in Europe and in the 40s and 50s in the United States. It had several different leaders whose views changed considerably over time. Moreover, these thinkers differed from one another, often sharply. Because logical empiricism is here construed as a movement rather than as doctrine, there is probably no important position that all logical empiricists shared—including, surprisingly enough, empiricism. And while most participants in the movement were empiricists of one form or another, they disagreed on what the best form of empiricism was and on the cognitive status of empiricism. What held the group together was a common concern for scientific methodology and the important role that science could play in reshaping society. Within that scientific methodology the logical empiricists wanted to find a natural and important role for logic and mathematics and to find an understanding of philosophy according to which it was part of the scientific enterprise.","PeriodicalId":13793,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education","volume":"79 1","pages":"516-519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474290333.ch-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logical empiricism is a philosophic movement rather than a set of doctrines, and it flourished in the 1920s and 30s in several centers in Europe and in the 40s and 50s in the United States. It had several different leaders whose views changed considerably over time. Moreover, these thinkers differed from one another, often sharply. Because logical empiricism is here construed as a movement rather than as doctrine, there is probably no important position that all logical empiricists shared—including, surprisingly enough, empiricism. And while most participants in the movement were empiricists of one form or another, they disagreed on what the best form of empiricism was and on the cognitive status of empiricism. What held the group together was a common concern for scientific methodology and the important role that science could play in reshaping society. Within that scientific methodology the logical empiricists wanted to find a natural and important role for logic and mathematics and to find an understanding of philosophy according to which it was part of the scientific enterprise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逻辑经验主义的遗产
逻辑经验主义是一种哲学运动,而不是一套学说,它在20世纪20年代和30年代在欧洲的几个中心以及40年代和50年代在美国蓬勃发展。它有几个不同的领导人,他们的观点随着时间的推移发生了很大的变化。此外,这些思想家彼此之间的差异往往很大。因为逻辑经验主义在这里被解释为一种运动,而不是一种教义,所以可能没有一个重要的立场是所有逻辑经验主义者都认同的——令人惊讶的是,包括经验主义。虽然运动的大多数参与者都是经验主义者,但他们在经验主义的最佳形式是什么以及经验主义的认知地位上存在分歧。把这群人团结在一起的是对科学方法论的共同关注,以及科学在重塑社会方面可能发挥的重要作用。在这种科学方法论中,逻辑经验主义者希望为逻辑和数学找到一个自然而重要的角色,并找到一种对哲学的理解,根据这种理解,哲学是科学事业的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lived experiences among high school students in playing 4 pics 1-word mobile game Practices, validity, and challenges of online formative assessment in Algerian higher education Mathematical process skills and cooperation character of elementary school students on simple flat building materials Turkish language teachers’ creative drama competence and opinions The effectiveness of question student method in social studies learning on activity and learning outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1