Education and the New Dark Ages? Conspiracy, social media and science denial

Michael Peters, Tina Besley
{"title":"Education and the New Dark Ages? Conspiracy, social media and science denial","authors":"Michael Peters, Tina Besley","doi":"10.46786/ac20.3082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing use of social media by many people, and where many actually get their news from social media rather than traditional media sources (newspapers, TV, and journals) amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, there is a huge increase in the number and influence of conspiracy theories world-wide. This has meant that those who believe and follow such theories are more likely to reject official health advice and government instructions, amid science denialism, anti-scientism and a distrust of experts, as well as politicians. Despite some efforts to remove misleading information, it remains easy to find sites promoting conspiracies such as ‘5G coronavirus’ as well as hate speech. But such theories are not limited to coronavirus, and in fact many others, such as QAnon, are actively or tacitly promoted by President Trump. Noting that neither conspiracies, nor science denialism are new, we start by briefly looking at the transition from the Dark Ages to Enlightenment and the Age of Reason, noting the case of Galileo. Then it was very dangerous to hold well-reasoned scientific views that did not fit with the prevailing views of the time; a combination of philosophical, and theological Church beliefs, which were based on Aristotelian geocentric views of the earth as the centre of the universe, and a geostatic literal biblical interpretation. We look at present day scientific skepticism and how to debunk some of the most widely held scientific myths. The need to educate and advocate for education that includes critical thinking, critical literacy, and critical media literacy is more important than ever or we risk having a large proportion of the population believing only what they read on social media and becoming dangerously anti-science and not prepared to even consider data or evidence and so be at the mercy of rampant and dangerous conspiracy theories — maybe risking a ‘New Dark Ages’!","PeriodicalId":7023,"journal":{"name":"ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46786/ac20.3082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the increasing use of social media by many people, and where many actually get their news from social media rather than traditional media sources (newspapers, TV, and journals) amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, there is a huge increase in the number and influence of conspiracy theories world-wide. This has meant that those who believe and follow such theories are more likely to reject official health advice and government instructions, amid science denialism, anti-scientism and a distrust of experts, as well as politicians. Despite some efforts to remove misleading information, it remains easy to find sites promoting conspiracies such as ‘5G coronavirus’ as well as hate speech. But such theories are not limited to coronavirus, and in fact many others, such as QAnon, are actively or tacitly promoted by President Trump. Noting that neither conspiracies, nor science denialism are new, we start by briefly looking at the transition from the Dark Ages to Enlightenment and the Age of Reason, noting the case of Galileo. Then it was very dangerous to hold well-reasoned scientific views that did not fit with the prevailing views of the time; a combination of philosophical, and theological Church beliefs, which were based on Aristotelian geocentric views of the earth as the centre of the universe, and a geostatic literal biblical interpretation. We look at present day scientific skepticism and how to debunk some of the most widely held scientific myths. The need to educate and advocate for education that includes critical thinking, critical literacy, and critical media literacy is more important than ever or we risk having a large proportion of the population believing only what they read on social media and becoming dangerously anti-science and not prepared to even consider data or evidence and so be at the mercy of rampant and dangerous conspiracy theories — maybe risking a ‘New Dark Ages’!
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育与新的黑暗时代?阴谋、社交媒体和否认科学
随着许多人越来越多地使用社交媒体,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,许多人实际上是从社交媒体而不是传统媒体来源(报纸、电视和期刊)获取新闻,阴谋论的数量和影响力在世界范围内大幅增加。这意味着那些相信并遵循这些理论的人更有可能拒绝官方的健康建议和政府的指示,他们否认科学,反科学,不信任专家和政治家。尽管采取了一些措施来消除误导性信息,但仍然很容易找到宣传“5G冠状病毒”等阴谋论以及仇恨言论的网站。但这样的理论并不局限于冠状病毒,事实上,许多其他理论,如QAnon,都是特朗普总统积极或默认地推动的。注意到阴谋论和科学否认主义都不是什么新事物,我们首先简要地看看从黑暗时代到启蒙运动和理性时代的过渡,并注意到伽利略的例子。那时,持有与当时流行观点不符的合理的科学观点是非常危险的;哲学和神学教会信仰的结合,以亚里士多德的地心说为基础,认为地球是宇宙的中心,以及地球静力学圣经的字面解释。我们来看看当今的科学怀疑主义,以及如何揭穿一些最广泛持有的科学神话。教育和倡导包括批判性思维、批判性素养和批判性媒体素养在内的教育的必要性比以往任何时候都更加重要,否则我们就有可能让很大一部分人只相信他们在社交媒体上看到的东西,成为危险的反科学,甚至不准备考虑数据或证据,从而任由猖獗和危险的阴谋论摆布——可能会有“新黑暗时代”的风险!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Workload and the crisis in Australian school teaching Opportunities and Challenges of women academics of Samtse College of Education Pacific wayfinding educational leadership through Tautai o le Moana The 51st reason why there are so few Māori in science What can (lack of) equilibrium tell us about modern schooling?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1