How Can Social Movements Help Defend Democracy?

Q2 Social Sciences Contention Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.3167/cont.2018.060205
S. Popović, Slobodan Djinovic
{"title":"How Can Social Movements Help Defend Democracy?","authors":"S. Popović, Slobodan Djinovic","doi":"10.3167/cont.2018.060205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece of “movement writing” is written by the\ncoheads of the Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies\nand the cofounders of the Otpor! movement that ousted Yugoslavian\nPresident Slobodan Milošević in 2000. The article discusses\nthe most promising tactics in contemporary prodemocracy activism,\ndrawing on the authors’ considerable experience working with\nactivists across the globe. Popović and Djinovic argue that the efficacy\nof traditional nonviolent strategies has waned with respect\nto contemporary prodemocracy struggles—which often seek to\ndefend institutions rather than dismantle them—and advocate for\nmore creative, humorous approach to contention.","PeriodicalId":36466,"journal":{"name":"Contention","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This piece of “movement writing” is written by the coheads of the Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies and the cofounders of the Otpor! movement that ousted Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milošević in 2000. The article discusses the most promising tactics in contemporary prodemocracy activism, drawing on the authors’ considerable experience working with activists across the globe. Popović and Djinovic argue that the efficacy of traditional nonviolent strategies has waned with respect to contemporary prodemocracy struggles—which often seek to defend institutions rather than dismantle them—and advocate for more creative, humorous approach to contention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会运动如何帮助捍卫民主?
这篇“运动写作”是由应用非暴力行动和策略中心的共同负责人和Otpor!2000年推翻南斯拉夫总统斯洛博丹Milošević的运动。这篇文章讨论了当代民主活动中最有前途的策略,借鉴了作者在全球范围内与活动人士合作的丰富经验。波波维奇和迪吉诺维奇认为,传统的非暴力策略的效力在当代的民主斗争中已经减弱——民主斗争往往寻求捍卫制度,而不是拆除它们——并提倡更有创意、更幽默的方法来争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contention
Contention Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
On Violence, Race, and Social Theory A Checkerboard of Ethnoracial Violence The Political Economy of Learning in Agrarian Contention Goals, Strategies, and Tactics Peaceful or Disciplined?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1