Beta-cell function and insulin resistance among First-Degree relatives of persons with type 2 diabetes in a Northwestern Nigerian Population

Y. Lawal, F. Bello, F. Anumah, A. Bakari
{"title":"Beta-cell function and insulin resistance among First-Degree relatives of persons with type 2 diabetes in a Northwestern Nigerian Population","authors":"Y. Lawal, F. Bello, F. Anumah, A. Bakari","doi":"10.4103/JHRR.JHRR_52_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Pancreatic beta-cell deficit and insulin resistance (IR) form two major factors in the etiopathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to assess beta-cell function and IR among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of persons with type 2 diabetes in a Northwestern Nigerian population. Other objectives include assessing the relationships among HOMA-%B, HOMA-IR, plasma glucose levels, and some obesity indices and to determine whether beta cell function, IR, and some obesity indices are independent determinants of glucose intolerance in the studied population. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 individuals and 200 controls were recruited through cluster sampling from their respective communities after due consent. The relevant biodata was documented and appropriate examinations including anthropometric measurements were carried out. Oral glucose tolerance test was carried out and fasting plasma insulin levels were also measured. IR and beta-cell function were calculated using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) method. Results: Mean HOMA-IR was higher while HOMA-% B lower among FDRs compared to controls. Significant independent determinants of glucose intolerance with odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) included age (OR = 1.9, CI 1.9–2.0, P = 0.002), body mass index (OR = 1.9, CI 1.8–2.0, P = 0.032), waist circumference (OR = 2.0, CI 1.9–2.0, P = 0.043), waist-to-hip ratio (OR = 1.1, CI 1.0–15.7, P = 0.022), HOMA-IR (OR = 3.0, CI 2.3–3.3, P < 0.001), and HOMA-B (OR = 0.43, CI 0.24–0.65, P < 0.001) which means HOMA-%B is protective against glucose intolerance with inverse OR of 1/0.43 = 2.3. Conclusions: IR was higher and beta cell functions lower among FDRs compared to controls. IR (HOMA-IR) and some obesity indices were significant determinants of glucose intolerance while HOMA-%B was protective against glucose intolerance in this study.","PeriodicalId":16068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","volume":"11 1","pages":"26 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JHRR.JHRR_52_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and Aims: Pancreatic beta-cell deficit and insulin resistance (IR) form two major factors in the etiopathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to assess beta-cell function and IR among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of persons with type 2 diabetes in a Northwestern Nigerian population. Other objectives include assessing the relationships among HOMA-%B, HOMA-IR, plasma glucose levels, and some obesity indices and to determine whether beta cell function, IR, and some obesity indices are independent determinants of glucose intolerance in the studied population. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 individuals and 200 controls were recruited through cluster sampling from their respective communities after due consent. The relevant biodata was documented and appropriate examinations including anthropometric measurements were carried out. Oral glucose tolerance test was carried out and fasting plasma insulin levels were also measured. IR and beta-cell function were calculated using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) method. Results: Mean HOMA-IR was higher while HOMA-% B lower among FDRs compared to controls. Significant independent determinants of glucose intolerance with odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) included age (OR = 1.9, CI 1.9–2.0, P = 0.002), body mass index (OR = 1.9, CI 1.8–2.0, P = 0.032), waist circumference (OR = 2.0, CI 1.9–2.0, P = 0.043), waist-to-hip ratio (OR = 1.1, CI 1.0–15.7, P = 0.022), HOMA-IR (OR = 3.0, CI 2.3–3.3, P < 0.001), and HOMA-B (OR = 0.43, CI 0.24–0.65, P < 0.001) which means HOMA-%B is protective against glucose intolerance with inverse OR of 1/0.43 = 2.3. Conclusions: IR was higher and beta cell functions lower among FDRs compared to controls. IR (HOMA-IR) and some obesity indices were significant determinants of glucose intolerance while HOMA-%B was protective against glucose intolerance in this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚西北部2型糖尿病患者一级亲属的β细胞功能和胰岛素抵抗
背景与目的:胰腺β细胞缺陷和胰岛素抵抗(IR)是2型糖尿病发病的两个主要因素。本研究的目的是评估尼日利亚西北部人群中2型糖尿病患者一级亲属(fdr)的β细胞功能和IR。其他目的包括评估HOMA-%B、HOMA-IR、血浆葡萄糖水平和一些肥胖指标之间的关系,并确定β细胞功能、IR和一些肥胖指标是否是研究人群中葡萄糖耐受不良的独立决定因素。材料与方法:经同意后,通过整群抽样的方式从各自所在社区中招募200名个体和200名对照。记录了相关的生物数据,并进行了适当的检查,包括人体测量。进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验,测定空腹血浆胰岛素水平。采用稳态模型评估法(HOMA)计算IR和β细胞功能。结果:与对照组相比,fdr患者的平均HOMA- ir较高,而HOMA-% B较低。具有优势比(OR)和置信区间(CI)的葡萄糖耐受不良的重要独立决定因素包括年龄(OR = 1.9, CI 1.9 - 2.0, P = 0.002)、体重指数(OR = 1.9, CI 1.8-2.0, P = 0.032)、腰围(OR = 2.0, CI 1.9 - 2.0, P = 0.043)、腰臀比(OR = 1.1, CI 1.0-15.7, P = 0.022)、HOMA-IR (OR = 3.0, CI 2.3-3.3, P < 0.001)和HOMA-B (OR = 0.43, CI 0.24-0.65)。P < 0.001),这意味着HOMA-%B对葡萄糖耐受不良有保护作用,其负比值为1/0.43 = 2.3。结论:与对照组相比,fdr患者IR较高,β细胞功能较低。IR (HOMA-IR)和一些肥胖指数是葡萄糖不耐受的重要决定因素,而HOMA-%B在本研究中对葡萄糖不耐受具有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease hospitalized with COVID-19: A single-center experience from Eastern India Biological plausibility of spirituality in public health The pH and titration values of commonly used beverages in Trinidad: A cross-sectional study A role of community nurses and challenges faced by them toward providing MCH services in selected blocks in West Bengal: A cross-sectional study Lifestyle changes during the Covid-19 lockdown among young adults in Kerala in terms of physical activity, sleeping habits, and perceived psychological problems: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1