Universalism values and organisational citizenship behaviour referring to employee perception of corporate social responsibility

Ž. Stankevičiūtė, W. Wereda
{"title":"Universalism values and organisational citizenship behaviour referring to employee perception of corporate social responsibility","authors":"Ž. Stankevičiūtė, W. Wereda","doi":"10.2478/mmcks-2020-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over the past decade, the number of studies investigating corporate social responsibility (CSR), its drivers and benefits has been growing. However, several gaps still remain. Previous research mostly investigated customer perceptions of CSR, leaving the employee perceptions in the sidelines and accordingly neglecting the employee importance. Furthermore, although acknowledging that employee perception of CSR is beneficial for the organisation, most of the previous studies have focused on employee attitudes as a desirable outcome forgetting about the employee behaviour, including organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB), which can be a source of competitive advantage. Moreover, although values have been recognised as key determinants of human attitudes and behaviour, it seems that the potential of values, including the universalism values, for driving the employee perception of CSR and OCB has not been revealed. Trying to close the gap, the paper aims at revealing the relationship between the employee perceptions of CSR, employee OCB and universalism values. In doing this, quantitative data were collected (301 responses in total). Consistent with the expectations, the survey indicated that employee perceptions of CSR directed at four main stakeholder groups, namely employees, customers, government, and social and non-social stakeholders had a positive effect on OCB. As it was expected, universalism values drive both the employee perception of CSR and employee OCB. Moreover, the findings support the idea that the employee perception of CSR partly mediates the relationship between the universalism values and OCB. Generally, the obtained results highlight the necessity for organisations to invest not only in CSR, but also in employee perceptions of CSR, as this could drive extra-role employee behaviour, namely OCB.","PeriodicalId":44909,"journal":{"name":"Management & Marketing-Challenges for the Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Marketing-Challenges for the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decade, the number of studies investigating corporate social responsibility (CSR), its drivers and benefits has been growing. However, several gaps still remain. Previous research mostly investigated customer perceptions of CSR, leaving the employee perceptions in the sidelines and accordingly neglecting the employee importance. Furthermore, although acknowledging that employee perception of CSR is beneficial for the organisation, most of the previous studies have focused on employee attitudes as a desirable outcome forgetting about the employee behaviour, including organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB), which can be a source of competitive advantage. Moreover, although values have been recognised as key determinants of human attitudes and behaviour, it seems that the potential of values, including the universalism values, for driving the employee perception of CSR and OCB has not been revealed. Trying to close the gap, the paper aims at revealing the relationship between the employee perceptions of CSR, employee OCB and universalism values. In doing this, quantitative data were collected (301 responses in total). Consistent with the expectations, the survey indicated that employee perceptions of CSR directed at four main stakeholder groups, namely employees, customers, government, and social and non-social stakeholders had a positive effect on OCB. As it was expected, universalism values drive both the employee perception of CSR and employee OCB. Moreover, the findings support the idea that the employee perception of CSR partly mediates the relationship between the universalism values and OCB. Generally, the obtained results highlight the necessity for organisations to invest not only in CSR, but also in employee perceptions of CSR, as this could drive extra-role employee behaviour, namely OCB.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普遍主义价值观和组织公民行为指的是员工对企业社会责任的感知
在过去的十年中,关于企业社会责任(CSR)及其驱动因素和效益的研究越来越多。然而,仍存在一些差距。以往的研究大多是调查客户对企业社会责任的看法,将员工的看法放在一边,从而忽视了员工的重要性。此外,尽管承认员工对企业社会责任的认知对组织有益,但之前的大多数研究都把重点放在员工态度上,认为这是一种理想的结果,而忘记了员工行为,包括组织公民行为(OCB),这可能是竞争优势的来源。此外,虽然价值观已被认为是人类态度和行为的关键决定因素,但似乎价值观的潜力,包括普世主义价值观,在推动员工对企业社会责任和公民社会责任的看法方面尚未得到揭示。为了缩小这一差距,本文旨在揭示员工社会责任感知、员工公民责任感知与普世价值观之间的关系。在此过程中,收集了定量数据(总共301份回复)。与预期一致的是,调查表明,员工对四个主要利益相关者群体(即员工、客户、政府、社会和非社会利益相关者)的企业社会责任感知对组织公民行为有积极影响。正如预期的那样,普世主义价值观驱动员工对企业社会责任和员工公民责任的认知。此外,研究结果支持了员工社会责任感知在一定程度上中介了普世主义价值观与组织公民行为之间的关系。总的来说,所获得的结果强调了组织不仅需要投资于企业社会责任,还需要投资于员工对企业社会责任的看法,因为这可能会推动员工的角色外行为,即公民责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing energy performance through heat pumps. Success drivers and barriers in residential sector An innovative conceptual model for education and training on hybrid warfare Sales effect of a software product series’ length in Japan Determinants of digital wallet adoption and super app: A review and research model Capital Market Volatility During Crises: Oil Price Insights, VIX Index, and Gold Price Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1