Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Scholarly Publishing Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.3138/jsp-2017-0017
J. A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets
{"title":"Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature","authors":"J. A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2017-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The status of published literature can change at any time in its history following publication, although existing structures in academic publishing for recording these changes, despite the existence of a number of robust tools—such as the digital object identifier (DOI)—appear to be insufficiently robust, or used too inconsistently or inefficiently, to deal with multiple corrections. In this article, an information storage method and corrective measure or tool is proposed—the ‘publication history’—that considers the full history and background of an article’s publication. The ‘publication history’ is adjusted to record changes to an article over time, and is thus a ‘live’ document, always open to modification and updating. The ‘publication history’ has the potential to accommodate, in a single document (in both PDF and HTML format), information about pre-publication (e.g., preprints) and post-publication events, including submission, resubmission, acceptance date, handling editors, peer-review format, corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions. The ‘publication history’ employs two DOIs, one for the article and one for any and all edits, to document these changes. Our proposal offers one possible solution for fortifying the integrity of peer review and the publication process pre- and post–peer review. The double-DOI-based ‘publication history’ can be applied to any document.","PeriodicalId":44613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2017-0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract:The status of published literature can change at any time in its history following publication, although existing structures in academic publishing for recording these changes, despite the existence of a number of robust tools—such as the digital object identifier (DOI)—appear to be insufficiently robust, or used too inconsistently or inefficiently, to deal with multiple corrections. In this article, an information storage method and corrective measure or tool is proposed—the ‘publication history’—that considers the full history and background of an article’s publication. The ‘publication history’ is adjusted to record changes to an article over time, and is thus a ‘live’ document, always open to modification and updating. The ‘publication history’ has the potential to accommodate, in a single document (in both PDF and HTML format), information about pre-publication (e.g., preprints) and post-publication events, including submission, resubmission, acceptance date, handling editors, peer-review format, corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions. The ‘publication history’ employs two DOIs, one for the article and one for any and all edits, to document these changes. Our proposal offers one possible solution for fortifying the integrity of peer review and the publication process pre- and post–peer review. The double-DOI-based ‘publication history’ can be applied to any document.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出版历史:一种基于双doi的方法,用于存储和/或监测已发表和已更正学术文献的信息
摘要:出版后,已发表文献的状态可以在其历史上的任何时间发生变化,尽管存在许多健壮的工具(如数字对象标识符(DOI)),但学术出版中记录这些变化的现有结构似乎不够健壮,或者使用太不一致或效率低下,无法处理多次更正。在本文中,提出了一种信息存储方法和纠正措施或工具-“发布历史”-它考虑了文章发布的完整历史和背景。随着时间的推移,“发布历史”被调整为记录文章的变化,因此是一个“实时”文档,始终对修改和更新开放。“出版历史”有可能在单个文档(PDF和HTML格式)中容纳关于出版前(例如,预印本)和出版后事件的信息,包括提交、再提交、接受日期、处理编辑、同行评审格式、更正、关注表达和撤回。“发布历史”使用两个doi,一个用于文章,另一个用于任何和所有编辑,以记录这些更改。我们的建议为加强同行评议和出版过程的完整性提供了一个可能的解决方案——前后同行评议。基于双doi的“出版历史”可以应用于任何文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, the Journal of Scholarly Publishing has been the authoritative voice of academic publishing. The journal combines philosophical analysis with practical advice and aspires to explain, argue, discuss, and question the large collection of new topics that continually arise in the publishing field. JSP has also examined the future of scholarly publishing, scholarship on the web, digitization, copyright, editorial policies, computer applications, marketing, and pricing models. It is the indispensable resource for academics and publishers that addresses the new challenges resulting from changes in technology and funding and from innovations in production and publishing.
期刊最新文献
Crossing Between Clinical Work and Scholarly Publishing: Early-Career Neurosurgeons as Clinician-Researchers The Ethics of Scholarly Book Reviewing On Editor’s Instructions to Manuscript Reviewers Unraveling the Attributes of Productive Scholars in Social Science Fields: A Study of Chinese Scholars Publishing in Top-Tier International Journals The Conceptual ‘APC Ring’: Is There a Risk of APC-Driven Guest Authorship, and Is a Change in the Culture of the APC Needed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1