The Uptick in Income Segregation: Real Trend or Random Sampling Variance

J. Logan, A. Foster, Jun Ke, Fan Li
{"title":"The Uptick in Income Segregation: Real Trend or Random Sampling Variance","authors":"J. Logan, A. Foster, Jun Ke, Fan Li","doi":"10.3386/w23656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies have reported a reversal of an earlier trend in income segregation in metropolitan regions, from a decline in the 1990s to an increase in the 2000-2010 decade. This finding reinforces concerns about the growing overall income inequality in the U.S. since the 1970s. Yet the evidence may be systematically biased to show an upward trend because the effective sample for the American Community Survey (ACS) is much smaller than it was for Census 2000, to which it is being compared. There is a possibility that the apparent changes in disparities across census tracts result partly from a higher level of sampling variation and bias due to the smaller sample. This study uses 100% microdata from the 1940 census to simulate the impact of different sampling rates on estimates of several measures of segregation and to propose and test the effectiveness of approaches to correcting the bias. It then applies those approaches to publicly available data for 2000 and 2007-2011. The reduction in sample sizes associated with the ACS results in exaggeration of evidence for increasing income segregation for all measures tested here, especially for subgroups (African Americans are studied here as an example). The methods of correction applied here will yield more conclusive and unbiased results when applied to the original sample data that is held internally by the Census Bureau.","PeriodicalId":18934,"journal":{"name":"National Bureau of Economic Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Bureau of Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w23656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent studies have reported a reversal of an earlier trend in income segregation in metropolitan regions, from a decline in the 1990s to an increase in the 2000-2010 decade. This finding reinforces concerns about the growing overall income inequality in the U.S. since the 1970s. Yet the evidence may be systematically biased to show an upward trend because the effective sample for the American Community Survey (ACS) is much smaller than it was for Census 2000, to which it is being compared. There is a possibility that the apparent changes in disparities across census tracts result partly from a higher level of sampling variation and bias due to the smaller sample. This study uses 100% microdata from the 1940 census to simulate the impact of different sampling rates on estimates of several measures of segregation and to propose and test the effectiveness of approaches to correcting the bias. It then applies those approaches to publicly available data for 2000 and 2007-2011. The reduction in sample sizes associated with the ACS results in exaggeration of evidence for increasing income segregation for all measures tested here, especially for subgroups (African Americans are studied here as an example). The methods of correction applied here will yield more conclusive and unbiased results when applied to the original sample data that is held internally by the Census Bureau.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入隔离的加剧:真实趋势还是随机抽样方差
最近的研究报告称,大都市地区收入隔离的早期趋势出现了逆转,从20世纪90年代的下降到2000-2010年的增加。这一发现加剧了人们对上世纪70年代以来美国整体收入差距日益扩大的担忧。然而,证据可能系统性地偏向于显示上升趋势,因为美国社区调查(ACS)的有效样本比2000年人口普查的有效样本要小得多。有一种可能性是,人口普查区差异的明显变化,部分是由于样本较小而导致的更高水平的抽样变异和偏差。本研究使用1940年人口普查的100%微观数据来模拟不同抽样率对几种隔离措施估计的影响,并提出和测试纠正偏差的方法的有效性。然后将这些方法应用于2000年和2007-2011年的公开数据。与ACS相关的样本量的减少导致在这里测试的所有措施中,特别是在亚群体中,夸大了收入隔离加剧的证据(这里以非洲裔美国人为例进行研究)。当应用于人口普查局内部持有的原始样本数据时,这里采用的校正方法将产生更确凿和公正的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maximum Employment and the Participation Cycle Gay Politics Goes Mainstream: Democrats, Republicans, and Same-Sex Relationships Welfare and Output with Income Effects and Taste Shocks Which Markets (Don't) Drive Pharmaceutical Innovation? Evidence From U.S. Medicaid Expansions School Reopenings, Mobility, and COVID-19 Spread: Evidence from Texas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1