A Script for the Witch: Witches' Voices in Two British Dramas

J. Handley
{"title":"A Script for the Witch: Witches' Voices in Two British Dramas","authors":"J. Handley","doi":"10.5325/preternature.8.2.0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article examines two dramas that use historical representations of witchcraft and work from original sources as a starting point: The Witch of Edmonton by Rowley, Dekker, and Ford (1621) and Witchcraft by Joanna Baillie (1836). Whilst the majority of those convicted of witchcraft in the early modern period were women, finding a female voice in historical sources is difficult. What is striking about these plays therefore, is the prominent voice allocated to the witch figures on stage. This not only presents a challenge to the control of the official narratives but draws attention to the social mechanisms at work in the conviction of a witch. The main argument is that the plays address an absence in the source materials; by presenting what can be termed as \"missing evidence\" through the voice of the witch, the plays contribute to the debate on witchcraft and force the audience to judge anew.","PeriodicalId":41216,"journal":{"name":"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural","volume":"150 1","pages":"202 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preternature-Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/preternature.8.2.0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:This article examines two dramas that use historical representations of witchcraft and work from original sources as a starting point: The Witch of Edmonton by Rowley, Dekker, and Ford (1621) and Witchcraft by Joanna Baillie (1836). Whilst the majority of those convicted of witchcraft in the early modern period were women, finding a female voice in historical sources is difficult. What is striking about these plays therefore, is the prominent voice allocated to the witch figures on stage. This not only presents a challenge to the control of the official narratives but draws attention to the social mechanisms at work in the conviction of a witch. The main argument is that the plays address an absence in the source materials; by presenting what can be termed as "missing evidence" through the voice of the witch, the plays contribute to the debate on witchcraft and force the audience to judge anew.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《女巫的剧本:两部英剧中女巫的声音》
本文以罗利、德克尔和福特的《埃德蒙顿女巫》(1621年)和乔安娜·贝利的《巫术》(1836年)这两部以巫术的历史表现和原著作品为出发点的戏剧为研究对象。虽然在近代早期被判犯有巫术罪的大多数是女性,但在历史资料中找到女性的声音是很困难的。因此,这些戏剧的惊人之处在于,舞台上女巫人物的突出嗓音。这不仅对官方叙事的控制提出了挑战,而且引起了人们对女巫定罪过程中起作用的社会机制的关注。主要的论点是,戏剧解决了原始材料的缺失;通过女巫的声音呈现出所谓的“缺失的证据”,戏剧促成了关于巫术的辩论,迫使观众重新判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Preternature provides an interdisciplinary, inclusive forum for the study of topics that stand in the liminal space between the known world and the inexplicable. The journal embraces a broad and dynamic definition of the preternatural that encompasses the weird and uncanny—magic, witchcraft, spiritualism, occultism, esotericism, demonology, monstrophy, and more, recognizing that the areas of magic, religion, and science are fluid and that their intersections should continue to be explored, contextualized, and challenged.
期刊最新文献
Werewolves in Old Norse-Icelandic Literature: Between the Monster and the Man Magie und Liminalität: seiðr in der altnordischen Überlieferung Trafficking with Demons: Magic, Ritual, and Gender from Late Antiquity to 1000 Kouzelnické a čarodějnické procesy v Českých zemích a ve střední Evropě Haunted Houses, Haunted Minds: Psychical Research, Psychoanalysis, and the Philip Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1