5PSQ-139 Prescriptive appropriateness of antibiotic therapies: crucial role of the hospital pharmacist

P. Sorice, S. Corridoni, L. Armillei, F. Gasbarri, G. Florio, S. Pizzica, C. Cinalli, G. D. Carlo, A. Romagnoli, L. Auriemma, A. Costantini
{"title":"5PSQ-139 Prescriptive appropriateness of antibiotic therapies: crucial role of the hospital pharmacist","authors":"P. Sorice, S. Corridoni, L. Armillei, F. Gasbarri, G. Florio, S. Pizzica, C. Cinalli, G. D. Carlo, A. Romagnoli, L. Auriemma, A. Costantini","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance In the context of the single dose, the pharmacist is involved in the validation of patients‘ personalised therapies, attempting to minimise errors in therapy. Aim and objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate, through the computerised prescription, the increase in prescribing appropriateness of antibiotic therapy, following notification by the pharmacist, with relative money saving costs. Material and methods The analysis was carried out by extrapolating, from the unit dose (UD) software, prescriptions of antibiotics subjected to a single request motivated (SRM) in the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019. We analysed inappropriate prescriptions where the hospital pharmacist affixed the ‘note’, sent immediately to the prescriber. These prescriptions were divided into inappropriate for: posology, duration of therapy and interaction/incompatibility. Subsequently, the variation in prescriptions due to the pharmacist’s intervention was evaluated (ie, the number of inappropriate prescriptions which were changed by the physician was extrapolated). In the pharmacoeconomic field, we evaluated the expenditure of inappropriate prescriptions without notification of the hospital pharmacist and the savings obtained following the change in therapy. Results During the study period, total prescriptions of antibiotics with SRM were 2067; 216 (10.45%) were not appropriate. The number of prescriptions modified following the pharmacist’s intervention was 104 (48%). Pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that the expenditure incurred for the dispensation of antibiotics related to inappropriate prescriptions changed by notification from the pharmacist was 77 537€ for 12 months. If the physician had not modified the therapies, the expenses would have been 162 762€ and therefore the amount of money saved was 85 225€ in 12 months. Conclusion and relevance The control and validation of medical prescriptions by the pharmacist produced an important added value to the risk management process, in that in almost 50% of cases the pharmacist’s notes led to an actual change in the medical prescription. The use of computerised prescriptions and single dose management contributed strongly to the objectives of verifying prescriptive appropriateness as a tool to govern effectiveness, efficiency and costs in healthcare. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance In the context of the single dose, the pharmacist is involved in the validation of patients‘ personalised therapies, attempting to minimise errors in therapy. Aim and objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate, through the computerised prescription, the increase in prescribing appropriateness of antibiotic therapy, following notification by the pharmacist, with relative money saving costs. Material and methods The analysis was carried out by extrapolating, from the unit dose (UD) software, prescriptions of antibiotics subjected to a single request motivated (SRM) in the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019. We analysed inappropriate prescriptions where the hospital pharmacist affixed the ‘note’, sent immediately to the prescriber. These prescriptions were divided into inappropriate for: posology, duration of therapy and interaction/incompatibility. Subsequently, the variation in prescriptions due to the pharmacist’s intervention was evaluated (ie, the number of inappropriate prescriptions which were changed by the physician was extrapolated). In the pharmacoeconomic field, we evaluated the expenditure of inappropriate prescriptions without notification of the hospital pharmacist and the savings obtained following the change in therapy. Results During the study period, total prescriptions of antibiotics with SRM were 2067; 216 (10.45%) were not appropriate. The number of prescriptions modified following the pharmacist’s intervention was 104 (48%). Pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that the expenditure incurred for the dispensation of antibiotics related to inappropriate prescriptions changed by notification from the pharmacist was 77 537€ for 12 months. If the physician had not modified the therapies, the expenses would have been 162 762€ and therefore the amount of money saved was 85 225€ in 12 months. Conclusion and relevance The control and validation of medical prescriptions by the pharmacist produced an important added value to the risk management process, in that in almost 50% of cases the pharmacist’s notes led to an actual change in the medical prescription. The use of computerised prescriptions and single dose management contributed strongly to the objectives of verifying prescriptive appropriateness as a tool to govern effectiveness, efficiency and costs in healthcare. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素治疗的处方适宜性:医院药师的关键作用
背景和重要性在单剂量的情况下,药剂师参与患者个性化治疗的验证,试图减少治疗中的错误。目的和目的本研究的目的是评估,通过计算机化处方,增加抗生素治疗处方的适当性,在药剂师通知后,相对省钱的成本。材料与方法通过单位剂量(UD)软件外推2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日单次请求驱动(SRM)抗生素处方进行分析。我们分析了不合适的处方,医院药剂师贴了“说明”,立即发给处方者。这些处方被分为不适宜:病理、治疗时间和相互作用/不相容。随后,评估了由于药剂师干预而导致的处方变化(即,推断出由医生改变的不适当处方的数量)。在药物经济学领域,我们评估了在没有通知医院药剂师的情况下不适当处方的支出和改变治疗后获得的节省。结果研究期间,SRM类抗菌药物处方总数为2067张;216例(10.45%)不适宜。药师干预后修改处方104张(48%)。药物经济学分析显示,12个月内,因药剂师通知更改不适当处方而导致的抗生素调剂支出为77 537欧元。如果医生没有修改治疗方法,费用将是162 762欧元,因此在12个月内节省的金额为85 225欧元。药师对处方的控制和验证对风险管理过程产生了重要的附加价值,因为在近50%的情况下,药师的笔记导致了处方的实际更改。计算机化处方和单剂量管理的使用有力地促进了验证处方适当性的目标,将其作为管理医疗保健效力、效率和成本的工具。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1