Tempered radicalism

IF 1.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.3167/latiss.2023.160203
M. Vaul-Grimwood, Vani Naik, C. Graham, Zack Moir, F. Smart
{"title":"Tempered radicalism","authors":"M. Vaul-Grimwood, Vani Naik, C. Graham, Zack Moir, F. Smart","doi":"10.3167/latiss.2023.160203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article explores Meyerson and Scully's concept of ‘tempered radicalism’ (1995) in the context of contemporary academic practice and identity. We report on a collaborative autoethnographic study which addressed the question: ‘What does the concept of tempered radicalism mean to us as academics in contemporary higher education?’. We explore how the concept of tempered radicalism allows us to consider our own actions and abilities to drive change within an increasingly challenging higher education environment moulded by the policies, values and practices of neoliberal economics. In this context, we share differing perspectives on what it means to bring a values-based criticality to our work. It is the breadth of Meyerson and Scully's concept which allows us to approach this exploration in a way which emphasises commonality rather than difference and facilitates collaboration. This article therefore showcases the utility of tempered radicalism to academics with a range of perspectives.","PeriodicalId":45061,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2023.160203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores Meyerson and Scully's concept of ‘tempered radicalism’ (1995) in the context of contemporary academic practice and identity. We report on a collaborative autoethnographic study which addressed the question: ‘What does the concept of tempered radicalism mean to us as academics in contemporary higher education?’. We explore how the concept of tempered radicalism allows us to consider our own actions and abilities to drive change within an increasingly challenging higher education environment moulded by the policies, values and practices of neoliberal economics. In this context, we share differing perspectives on what it means to bring a values-based criticality to our work. It is the breadth of Meyerson and Scully's concept which allows us to approach this exploration in a way which emphasises commonality rather than difference and facilitates collaboration. This article therefore showcases the utility of tempered radicalism to academics with a range of perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
的激进主义
本文在当代学术实践和身份认同的背景下探讨了迈耶森和斯库利的“温和激进主义”(1995)概念。我们报告了一项合作的民族志研究,该研究解决了这样一个问题:“温和激进主义的概念对我们当代高等教育的学者意味着什么?”我们将探讨温和激进主义的概念如何让我们考虑自己的行动和能力,在新自由主义经济学的政策、价值观和实践塑造的日益具有挑战性的高等教育环境中推动变革。在此背景下,我们对将基于价值观的批判性引入我们的工作意味着什么有着不同的看法。正是Meyerson和Scully的概念的广度使我们能够以一种强调共性而不是差异并促进合作的方式来进行这一探索。因此,这篇文章展示了温和激进主义对具有一系列观点的学者的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT
Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Applied Scenarios: Embedding Psychological Literacy in Assessment Corrigendum to: “Retrieval practice: Beneficial for all students or moderated by individual differences?” Editorial PLAT 22(3) 2023 Abstracts of recent articles published in Teaching of Psychology Abstracts of recent articles published in Teaching of Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1