The effect of D-cycloserine on social anxiety treatment using a behavioral outcome measure and a post-session administration strategy.

Sheerin Cm, Kozak At, Hale Ac, Bcba, Ramesh Bk, Spates Cr
{"title":"The effect of D-cycloserine on social anxiety treatment using a behavioral outcome measure and a post-session administration strategy.","authors":"Sheerin Cm, Kozak At, Hale Ac, Bcba, Ramesh Bk, Spates Cr","doi":"10.1037/BAR0000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe drug D-Cycloserine (DCS) has been used as an adjunct to increase the pace of symptom reductions during exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. This procedure has met with mixed results andmany questions remain. Aims: The findings from two investigations are reported here, highlighting important domains for furthering our understanding of DCS effects.\n\n\nMETHOD\nStudy 1 (n = 16) treated social anxiety among a sample of emerging adults, and in addition to self-report utilized a behavioral measure of symptom improvement to evaluate outcomes. Study 2 (n = 16), utilizing a similar design, introduced an algorithm based post-session administration strategy following sessions where anxiety reductions were evident. Both investigations were double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized trials with participants diagnosed with social anxiety. Treatment was an exposure-based CBT-protocol adopted in other investigations that tested DCS.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFindings of Study 1 yielded an interaction effect in favor of DCS for self-reported distress ratings (p=.02) and on a behavioral measure of anxiety (p=.01). Findings from Study 2 revealed a significant effect for self-reported subjective distress ratings (p=.002).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough limitations of small sample size constrain generalization and limit power, results illustrate some beneficial effects of DCS within the context of exposure-based intervention for social anxiety, yet are discussed in the context of statistical vs. clinical significance and the DCS literature as a whole. Present findings highlight the potential usefulness of a post-session administration strategy and the behavioral measure for future efforts with an eye towards preventing bias through more nuanced and powered studies.","PeriodicalId":72345,"journal":{"name":"Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/BAR0000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND The drug D-Cycloserine (DCS) has been used as an adjunct to increase the pace of symptom reductions during exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. This procedure has met with mixed results andmany questions remain. Aims: The findings from two investigations are reported here, highlighting important domains for furthering our understanding of DCS effects. METHOD Study 1 (n = 16) treated social anxiety among a sample of emerging adults, and in addition to self-report utilized a behavioral measure of symptom improvement to evaluate outcomes. Study 2 (n = 16), utilizing a similar design, introduced an algorithm based post-session administration strategy following sessions where anxiety reductions were evident. Both investigations were double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized trials with participants diagnosed with social anxiety. Treatment was an exposure-based CBT-protocol adopted in other investigations that tested DCS. RESULTS Findings of Study 1 yielded an interaction effect in favor of DCS for self-reported distress ratings (p=.02) and on a behavioral measure of anxiety (p=.01). Findings from Study 2 revealed a significant effect for self-reported subjective distress ratings (p=.002). CONCLUSIONS Although limitations of small sample size constrain generalization and limit power, results illustrate some beneficial effects of DCS within the context of exposure-based intervention for social anxiety, yet are discussed in the context of statistical vs. clinical significance and the DCS literature as a whole. Present findings highlight the potential usefulness of a post-session administration strategy and the behavioral measure for future efforts with an eye towards preventing bias through more nuanced and powered studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
d -环丝氨酸对社交焦虑治疗的影响,使用行为结果测量和治疗后管理策略。
背景:药物d -环丝氨酸(DCS)已被用作一种辅助药物,以加快焦虑症暴露治疗期间症状减轻的速度。这一过程的结果好坏参半,还有许多问题有待解决。目的:本文报告了两项调查的结果,强调了进一步了解DCS效应的重要领域。方法研究1 (n = 16)在初出期成人样本中治疗社交焦虑,除了自我报告外,还使用症状改善的行为测量来评估结果。研究2 (n = 16)采用了类似的设计,在焦虑明显减少的治疗后引入了基于算法的治疗后管理策略。这两项研究都是双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验,参与者被诊断为社交焦虑。治疗是在其他测试DCS的调查中采用的基于暴露的cbt方案。研究1的结果显示DCS在自我报告的痛苦评分(p= 0.02)和焦虑的行为测量(p= 0.01)方面具有相互作用。研究2的结果显示,自我报告的主观痛苦评分有显著影响(p= 0.002)。结论:虽然小样本量的限制限制了推广和限制了有效性,但结果表明DCS在基于暴露的社交焦虑干预背景下的一些有益效果,但在统计与临床意义以及DCS文献的背景下进行了讨论。目前的研究结果强调了会后管理策略和行为措施的潜在有用性,以通过更细致和更有力的研究来防止偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correspondence between data provided by parents and trained observers about challenging behavior. Supplemental Material for Correspondence Between Data Provided by Parents and Trained Observers About Challenging Behavior SΔp: The Missing Discriminative Stimulus for Non-Punishment. Validation of a tablet-based program for skill acquisition research. Aggression and crying as side effects of time-out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1