Making Better Tests with the Rasch Measurement Model

Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin
{"title":"Making Better Tests with the Rasch Measurement Model","authors":"Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin","doi":"10.46504/14201805ka","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study had two aims. The first was to explain the process of using the Rasch measurement model to validate tests in an easy-to-understand way for those unfamiliar with the Rasch measurement model. The second was to validate two final exams with several shared items. The exams were given to two groups of students with slightly differing English listening proficiency. The two exams, a low-advanced and a high-advanced exam, were given to 76 and 45 Japanese university students, respectively. Each exam had 56 questions with 26 shared questions linking the two exams. After conducting a simple Rasch analysis, it was determined that up to 33 questions needed to be modified or deleted from subsequent versions of the exam. The unexpected number of recommended modifications and deletions suggests that, even for experienced teachers, the Rasch measurement model can be of tremendous value by offering greater precision in the assessment of students, as well as greater assistance in the validation of tests.","PeriodicalId":30055,"journal":{"name":"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InSight A Journal of Scholarly Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46504/14201805ka","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study had two aims. The first was to explain the process of using the Rasch measurement model to validate tests in an easy-to-understand way for those unfamiliar with the Rasch measurement model. The second was to validate two final exams with several shared items. The exams were given to two groups of students with slightly differing English listening proficiency. The two exams, a low-advanced and a high-advanced exam, were given to 76 and 45 Japanese university students, respectively. Each exam had 56 questions with 26 shared questions linking the two exams. After conducting a simple Rasch analysis, it was determined that up to 33 questions needed to be modified or deleted from subsequent versions of the exam. The unexpected number of recommended modifications and deletions suggests that, even for experienced teachers, the Rasch measurement model can be of tremendous value by offering greater precision in the assessment of students, as well as greater assistance in the validation of tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用Rasch测量模型进行更好的测试
这项研究有两个目的。首先是为不熟悉Rasch测量模型的人以一种易于理解的方式解释使用Rasch测量模型来验证测试的过程。第二个是用几个共享的项目验证两个期末考试。考试分为两组,他们的英语听力水平略有不同。76名日本大学生和45名日本大学生分别参加了低级和高级考试。每次考试有56个问题,其中26个共享问题连接两个考试。在进行了简单的拉什分析后,确定在后续版本的考试中需要修改或删除多达33个问题。建议修改和删除的数量出乎意料,这表明,即使对经验丰富的教师来说,Rasch测量模型也可以提供巨大的价值,因为它在评估学生时提供了更高的精度,并在验证测试时提供了更大的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Attaining an Undergraduate Certificate on Older Adults: Examining Qualitative Experiences of Students Developmental Relationships: An Examination into the Perceptions of Students on Their Relationships with Faculty Members Can We Please Rethink the Discussion Board? New Superheroes/Villain Characters for Teaching Engineering Materials Selection Asynchronous Online Discussion Forums: Effective Undergraduate and Graduate Course Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1