{"title":"An engineering evaluation of four fluid transfer devices for automated 384-well high throughput screening","authors":"Ted A. Bateman, Reed A. Ayers, R. Bryan Greenway","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1098-2728(1999)11:5<250::AID-LRA2>3.0.CO;2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As high throughput screening (HTS) evolves toward plate densities greater than 96 wells, the ability of fluid-handling devices to accurately transfer proportionately smaller volumes of liquid is challenged. This article examines the performance of four methods for plate-to-plate transfer of fluid volumes ranging from 10 nL to 10 μL. These volumes enable screening assays with plate densities of 384 wells or greater. The hardware are: (1) Zymark's Rapid Plate-96™ modified with an XY-stage, (2) Robbins Scientific's Hydra 384™, (3) Cartesian Engineering's PixSys™, and (4) Packard's BioChip™. The criteria that were chosen to quantitatively evaluate the liquid-handling devices are precision/coefficient of variation and the time to complete a transfer from one 384-well plate to another. In addition, a more subjective discussion is presented on the maintainability of the hardware, reagent waste minimization, general hardware “robustness,” and the capability and ease for integration into an HTS system. These criteria are evaluated from the standpoint of using the hardware in an integrated, fully automated HTS robotic system. This engineering evaluation concluded that the modified Rapid Plate-96™ and Hydra 384™ are best suited for immediate use in an automated HTS system, and the newer technologies employed by the PixSys and BioChip require improvements in reliability, speed, and ease of use. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Lab Robotics and Automation 11: 250–259, 1999</p>","PeriodicalId":100863,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Robotics and Automation","volume":"11 5","pages":"250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2728(1999)11:5<250::AID-LRA2>3.0.CO;2-1","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Robotics and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291098-2728%281999%2911%3A5%3C250%3A%3AAID-LRA2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
As high throughput screening (HTS) evolves toward plate densities greater than 96 wells, the ability of fluid-handling devices to accurately transfer proportionately smaller volumes of liquid is challenged. This article examines the performance of four methods for plate-to-plate transfer of fluid volumes ranging from 10 nL to 10 μL. These volumes enable screening assays with plate densities of 384 wells or greater. The hardware are: (1) Zymark's Rapid Plate-96™ modified with an XY-stage, (2) Robbins Scientific's Hydra 384™, (3) Cartesian Engineering's PixSys™, and (4) Packard's BioChip™. The criteria that were chosen to quantitatively evaluate the liquid-handling devices are precision/coefficient of variation and the time to complete a transfer from one 384-well plate to another. In addition, a more subjective discussion is presented on the maintainability of the hardware, reagent waste minimization, general hardware “robustness,” and the capability and ease for integration into an HTS system. These criteria are evaluated from the standpoint of using the hardware in an integrated, fully automated HTS robotic system. This engineering evaluation concluded that the modified Rapid Plate-96™ and Hydra 384™ are best suited for immediate use in an automated HTS system, and the newer technologies employed by the PixSys and BioChip require improvements in reliability, speed, and ease of use. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Lab Robotics and Automation 11: 250–259, 1999
384井高通量筛分四种流体输送装置的工程评价
随着高通量筛分技术(HTS)向大于96口井的板密度发展,流体处理设备准确转移成比例小体积液体的能力受到了挑战。本文考察了四种方法在10 nL至10 μL流体体积板间转移的性能。这些体积使筛选分析具有384孔或更大的板密度。硬件是:(1)Zymark的Rapid Plate-96™与xy级修改,(2)罗宾斯科学公司的Hydra 384™,(3)笛卡尔工程公司的PixSys™,(4)帕卡德的BioChip™。定量评价液体处理装置的标准是精度/变异系数和完成从一个384孔板转移到另一个384孔板的时间。此外,还对硬件的可维护性、试剂浪费最小化、一般硬件的“健壮性”以及集成到HTS系统中的能力和易用性进行了较为主观的讨论。这些标准是从在一个集成的、全自动的HTS机器人系统中使用硬件的角度来评估的。该工程评估的结论是,改进后的Rapid Plate-96™和Hydra 384™最适合在自动化HTS系统中立即使用,而PixSys和BioChip采用的新技术需要在可靠性、速度和易用性方面进行改进。©1999 John Wiley &儿子,Inc。实验室机器人与自动化(英文版),1999
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。