Ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA susceptibility profile of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacterial isolates: Experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_64_20
M. Paul, M. Bhatia, A. Raj, Amit Mangla, B. Omar, Pratima Gupta
{"title":"Ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA susceptibility profile of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacterial isolates: Experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand","authors":"M. Paul, M. Bhatia, A. Raj, Amit Mangla, B. Omar, Pratima Gupta","doi":"10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_64_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Studies have shown that ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination is a promising therapeutic option as carbapenem sparer in cases of infections caused by ESBL and MBL producing pathogens, respectively. This study is aimed to generate preliminary data on in-vitro susceptibility profile of clinical multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial isolates to ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1st, 2019 to October 31st, 2019. Antibiotic susceptibility data (including that of ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination) of 200 multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial isolates obtained from various nonrepetitive clinical samples of patients of all age groups and sexes, was retrospectively analyzed. All clinical samples were processed aerobically as per standard guidelines, and the bacterial isolates obtained in culture were identified by conventional biochemical methods. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates was performed using the modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method, the results of which were interpreted as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines 2019. In vitro susceptibility test results of ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination, disks were interpreted as per the manufacturer's instructions. Results: Acinetobacter spp. was the most common isolate (53%), followed by Escherichia coli (20.5%), Klebsiella spp. (17.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.5%), Citrobacter spp. (2%), and Proteus spp. (1%), respectively. 99.1%, 92.7%, 88.6%, and 69.3% of Acinetobacter spp., E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and P. aeruginosa, respectively, were susceptible to ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination disks. Conclusions: The preliminary data generated by our study could be an eye-opener for clinicians practicing in this part of the country and should prompt further investigation in the form of clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":16373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"189 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_64_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown that ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination is a promising therapeutic option as carbapenem sparer in cases of infections caused by ESBL and MBL producing pathogens, respectively. This study is aimed to generate preliminary data on in-vitro susceptibility profile of clinical multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial isolates to ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1st, 2019 to October 31st, 2019. Antibiotic susceptibility data (including that of ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination) of 200 multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial isolates obtained from various nonrepetitive clinical samples of patients of all age groups and sexes, was retrospectively analyzed. All clinical samples were processed aerobically as per standard guidelines, and the bacterial isolates obtained in culture were identified by conventional biochemical methods. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates was performed using the modified Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method, the results of which were interpreted as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines 2019. In vitro susceptibility test results of ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination, disks were interpreted as per the manufacturer's instructions. Results: Acinetobacter spp. was the most common isolate (53%), followed by Escherichia coli (20.5%), Klebsiella spp. (17.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.5%), Citrobacter spp. (2%), and Proteus spp. (1%), respectively. 99.1%, 92.7%, 88.6%, and 69.3% of Acinetobacter spp., E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and P. aeruginosa, respectively, were susceptible to ceftriaxone-sulbactam-EDTA combination disks. Conclusions: The preliminary data generated by our study could be an eye-opener for clinicians practicing in this part of the country and should prompt further investigation in the form of clinical trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重耐药革兰氏阴性细菌分离株的头孢曲松-舒巴坦- edta敏感性分析:来自北阿坎德邦里希凯什一家三级保健教学医院的经验
研究表明,头孢曲松-舒巴坦- edta联合治疗分别由ESBL和MBL产生病原体引起的感染是一种很有前景的治疗选择,因为它可以节省碳青霉烯。本研究旨在为临床多重耐药(MDR)革兰氏阴性菌分离株对头孢曲松-舒巴坦- edta联合用药的体外敏感性谱提供初步数据。材料与方法:横断面研究于2019年1月1日至2019年10月31日进行。回顾性分析了200株多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌分离株的抗生素敏感性数据(包括头孢曲松-舒巴坦- edta联合用药),这些分离株来自不同年龄和性别的患者的不同非重复性临床样本。所有临床样品均按标准指南进行好氧处理,培养中分离的细菌采用常规生化方法鉴定。采用改良Kirby Bauer纸片扩散法对分离细菌进行抗生素敏感性试验,试验结果按照临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI) 2019年指南进行解释。头孢曲松-舒巴坦- edta联合用药的体外药敏试验结果按厂家说明书解释。结果:最常见的分离物为不动杆菌(53%),其次为大肠埃希菌(20.5%)、克雷伯菌(17.5%)、铜绿假单胞菌(16.5%)、柠檬酸杆菌(2%)和变形杆菌(1%)。头孢曲松-舒巴坦- edta联合膜片对不动杆菌、大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性分别为99.1%、92.7%、88.6%和69.3%。结论:我们的研究产生的初步数据可以为在该国这一地区执业的临床医生开眼界,并应以临床试验的形式促进进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical role of zinc in dengue fever Concentration of chromium and nickel in serum of patients with orthopedic implant: An analysis Self-reliance in advanced diagnostic imaging for accessible, affordable, and quality health care in India A rare occurrence of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor in a young female Effects of muscle-specific exercises compared to existing interventions on insulin resistance among prediabetes population of South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1